| Literature DB >> 34001612 |
Xudong Lv1, Jeffrey H Walton2, Emanuel Druga1, Fei Wang1, Alessandra Aguilar1, Tommy McKnelly1, Raffi Nazaryan1, Fanglin Linda Liu3, Lan Wu1, Olga Shenderova4, Daniel B Vigneron5, Carlos A Meriles6,7, Jeffrey A Reimer8,9, Alexander Pines10, Ashok Ajoy10.
Abstract
Multimodal imaging-the ability to acquire images of an object through more than one imaging mode simultaneously-has opened additional perspectives in areas ranging from astronomy to medicine. In this paper, we report progress toward combining optical and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in such a "dual" imaging mode. They are attractive in combination because they offer complementary advantages of resolution and speed, especially in the context of imaging in scattering environments. Our approach relies on a specific material platform, microdiamond particles hosting nitrogen vacancy (NV) defect centers that fluoresce brightly under optical excitation and simultaneously "hyperpolarize" lattice [Formula: see text] nuclei, making them bright under MR imaging. We highlight advantages of dual-mode optical and MR imaging in allowing background-free particle imaging and describe regimes in which either mode can enhance the other. Leveraging the fact that the two imaging modes proceed in Fourier-reciprocal domains (real and k-space), we propose a sampling protocol that accelerates image reconstruction in sparse-imaging scenarios. Our work suggests interesting possibilities for the simultaneous optical and low-field MR imaging of targeted diamond nanoparticles.Entities:
Keywords: NV centers; dual-mode imaging; hyperpolarization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34001612 PMCID: PMC8166172 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2023579118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Dual-mode optical and MR imaging. (A) Experiment schematic. Diamond particles with centers are imaged with fluorescence under green (520 nm) excitation by a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) detector, as well as under MRI through polarization transferred to lattice nuclei from optically polarized electrons. (B) Hyperpolarization and detection protocol. The DNP occurs at low field 38 mT under MW sweeps across the ESR spectrum. FLASH MR imaging is performed after sample shuttling to 9.4 T. Here echo time TE = 0.5 ms, repetition time TR = 6 ms, acquisition time = 0.36 ms. (C) Typical hyperpolarization signal enhancement, showing signal gain 5 against thermal signal at 7 T, corresponding to 5 orders of magnitude acceleration in MR imaging time. For a fair comparison, the noise in both datasets is normalized to 1 (dashed lines). (D) Ring-shaped phantom filled with 40 mg of 200-m diamond particles employed for dual-mode imaging. (E) Fluorescence image captured through a 630-nm long-pass filter. (F) A MR FLASH image with 16 averages (8 s total imaging time) and a square pixel length of 160 m and square FOV with a 6.4-mm edge.
Fig. 2.On-demand dual-mode image modulation. (A, i) Normalized fluorescence signal for a randomly oriented diamond particle ensemble under an applied magnetic field (points, experiment; purple line, simulation). We ascribe the discrepancy to scattering effects. (A, ii) Optical modulation under 40 2 mT pulsed magnetic field showing a signal contrast 10%. (B) Optical images under 0 and 40 mT applied field showing weak 10% optical contrast. (C) The hyperpolarization sign control. MW frequency sweeps in low-to-high (high-to-low) fashion across the ESR spectrum lead to positive (negative) hyperpolarization. Shown are 7 T NMR spectra under opposite sweep conditions. (D) The MR images under opposite MW sweep conditions, showing full sign reversal and 194% modulation contrast. Here FLASH images were taken with TE = 0.6 ms and TR = 6 ms.
Fig. 3.Dual-mode background suppression. (A and B) Schematic of imaging phantoms. Diamonds are arranged in a ring-shaped phantom, cosituated with Alexa 647 dye and [13C]-methanol that present an artificial background for optical and MR imaging, respectively. (C and D) Optical and MR images with the background. Dashed lines serve as a guide to the eye for the imaging phantom. Diamond particles are indistinguishable from the background in both imaging dimensions. (E and F) Background suppressed optical and MR images employing signal modulation (reversal) allow complete recovery of the original diamond phantom in both imaging modes.
Dual-mode imaging regimes from a combination of optics and MRI
Regimes I and II consider optics and MRI being primary imaging modes in scattering and scattering-free media, respectively. Regime III considers sampling in both imaging dimensions as elucidated in the algorithm of dual-mode imaging. Red color indicates parameters where image enhancements can be gained via dual-mode combination, while blue indicates less improvement. For clarity, the variables here refer to , ratio between optical SNR and MR SNR at , incident power density; , pixel size; , , incident and emission light loss coefficients, including scattering and attenuation; , object depth; , imaging time; , , pixel size for optical and MRI; FOV, field of view; and , sparsity, the proportion of dark pixels.
*Extrapolated from , and taking a depth of 15 mm.
†The SNR gain in the third mode is defined as the ratio between dual-mode SNR and optical SNR.
Extrapolated from experimental number to 3 mm, using loss coefficient 13.5 for 532-nm laser and 12.1 for 650-nm fluorescence in scattering media (see , section 1A, diamond mass 40 mg). The coefficients are calculated based on fatty tissue data in ref. 32.
§Taken from the dual-mode experiment demonstrated in Fig. 1 (, section 1A).
¶Extrapolated from the experiment demonstrated in Fig. 1, assuming (6.4 mm)2 (details in , section 1B).
#Based on gyromagnetic ratio of , can be up to 60 T/m in ref. 33, and 1 ms.
Power reduction is defined as the ratio between the power required by the single primary mode and the dual-mode approach to achieve certain SNR.
**Obtained from Fig. 4 when assuming .
††See Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.Accelerated x-k conjugate-space imaging. (A) Protocol for accelerated imaging. samples of the image are first acquired in k-space, and the resulting image upon thresholding is fed forward to constrain the real-space points to be scanned over. (B) Exemplary scenario where the target image FOV consists of sparsely distributed objects. By sampling over = 16 k-space points in each dimension, a blurry yet faithful image is formed of the target (Center two panels) and can serve to restrict real-space sampling (Right panel), leading to 14 times acceleration. (C) Normalized imaging time with different values of for images in a -pixel square FOV of different sparsity factors. Right axis indicates corresponding imaging acceleration. Here images consisted of unit-pixel objects, and we averaged over 30 random image configurations with identical sparsity; error bars denote standard deviations. The presence of an optimal k-space sample threshold is evident, stemming from a compromise between better confinement in real-space imaging and associated time cost for k-space imaging. (D) Scaling of with image sparsity, showing that more k-space values are required to account for increasing imaging complexity. Points: Given discrete possible values of , has a staircase-like behavior. Solid line: scaling of assuming continuous values. (E) Optimized imaging acceleration through sampling points, showing orders of magnitude time savings at high sparsity. (F) Trajectory of image convergence quantified by image correlation with protocol advancement. Green dashed line shows linear convergence under conventional optical rastering. In contrast, hybrid sampling in conjugate spaces can lead to rapid image convergence. (Inset) Slope of image approach to target rapidly increases with sparsity.