Literature DB >> 34001229

Parent engagement in co-design of clinical trials: the PARENT trial.

Leigh M Vanderloo1,2, Shelley M Vanderhout3, Erika Tavares4, Jonathon Maguire5,6, Sharon Straus5,7, Catherine S Birken3,6.   

Abstract

Evidence generated from partnering with parents to design and conduct research together may be used to refine, adjust, and modify future research approaches. This study aimed to describe the initial approaches to parent engagement in the design of the PARENT trial as well as understand parent perspectives on the acceptability and relevance of the PARENT trial and potential barriers and facilitators to participation.Parents participating in the TARGet Kids! cohort were invited to participate in a focus group, called the PARENT panel, to co-design the PARENT trial. This focus group was conducted to capture diverse individual and collective parents' experiences. Overall methodological approaches for the PARENT panel were informed by the CIHR Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (SPOR) guiding principles (mutual respect, co-building, inclusiveness, and support) for patient engagement in research, and facilitated through the Knowledge Translation Program in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute at Unity Health Toronto. Using a Nominal Group Technique, the PARENT panel provided feedback on the feasibility, relevance, and acceptability of the proposed intervention. Findings from this work will be used to further refine, adjust, and modify the next iteration of the PARENT trial, which will also serve as an opportunity to discuss the efforts made by researchers to incorporate parent suggestions and what additional steps are required for improved patient engagement.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34001229     DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05305-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trials        ISSN: 1745-6215            Impact factor:   2.279


  14 in total

1.  Public and patient involvement in paediatric research.

Authors:  Jessica Bate; Neil Ranasinghe; Rebecca Ling; Jennifer Preston; Ruth Nightingale; Simon Denegri
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 1.309

2.  Priority setting in paediatric preventive care research.

Authors:  Mikael Lavigne; Catherine S Birken; Jonathon L Maguire; Sharon Straus; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Canadian childhood obesity estimates based on WHO, IOTF and CDC cut-points.

Authors:  Margot Shields; Mark S Tremblay
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Obes       Date:  2010-05-03

4.  Individuals with diabetes preferred that future trials use patient-important outcomes and provide pragmatic inferences.

Authors:  Mohammad H Murad; Nilay D Shah; Holly K Van Houten; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; James R Deming; Timothy J Beebe; Steven A Smith; Gordon H Guyatt; Victor M Montori
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Randomized trial of a prevention intervention that embeds weight-related messages within a general parenting program.

Authors:  Jess Haines; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Deborah Gross; Julia McDonald; Ken Kleinman; Matthew W Gillman
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set.

Authors:  Iain Chalmers; Michael B Bracken; Ben Djulbegovic; Silvio Garattini; Jonathan Grant; A Metin Gülmezoglu; David W Howells; John P A Ioannidis; Sandy Oliver
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Domecq; Gabriela Prutsky; Tarig Elraiyah; Zhen Wang; Mohammed Nabhan; Nathan Shippee; Juan Pablo Brito; Kasey Boehmer; Rim Hasan; Belal Firwana; Patricia Erwin; David Eton; Jeff Sloan; Victor Montori; Noor Asi; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dean Fergusson; Zarah Monfaredi; Kusala Pussegoda; Chantelle Garritty; Anne Lyddiatt; Beverley Shea; Lisa Duffett; Mona Ghannad; Joshua Montroy; M. Hassan Murad; Misty Pratt; Tamara Rader; Risa Shorr; Fatemeh Yazdi
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2018-05-22

9.  An empirically based conceptual framework for fostering meaningful patient engagement in research.

Authors:  Clayon B Hamilton; Alison M Hoens; Catherine L Backman; Annette M McKinnon; Shanon McQuitty; Kelly English; Linda C Li
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 10.  How and why should we engage parents as co-researchers in health research? A scoping review of current practices.

Authors:  Shuoqi Shen; Krissy A R Doyle-Thomas; Lori Beesley; Amir Karmali; Laura Williams; Nadia Tanel; Amy C McPherson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.