Literature DB >> 34001038

The Will Rogers phenomenon, breast cancer and race.

Mary R Nittala1, Eswar K Mundra2, S Packianathan2, Divyang Mehta2, Maria L Smith2, William C Woods2, Shawn McKinney3, Barbara S Craft4, Srinivasan Vijayakumar5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Will Rogers phenomenon [WRP] describes an apparent improvement in outcome for patients' group due to tumor grade reclassification. Staging of cancers is important to select appropriate treatment and to estimate prognosis. The WRP has been described as one of the most important biases limiting the use of historical cohorts when comparing survival or treatment. The main purpose of this study is to assess whether the WRP exists with the move from the AJCC 7th to AJCC 8th edition in breast cancer [BC] staging, and if racial differences are manifested in the expression of the WRP.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 300 BC women (2007-2017) at an academic medical center. Overall survival [OS] and disease-free survival [DFS] was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Bi and multi-variate Cox regression analyses was used to identify racial factors associated with outcomes.
RESULTS: Our patient cohort included 30.3% Caucasians [Whites] and 69.7% African-Americans [Blacks]. Stages I, II, III, and IV were 46.2, 26.3, 23.1, and 4.4% of Whites; 28.7, 43.1, 24.4, and 3.8% of Blacks respectively, in anatomic staging (p = 0.043). In prognostic staging, 52.8, 18.7, 23, and 5.5% were Whites while 35, 17.2, 43.5, and 4.3% were Blacks, respectively (p = 0.011). A total of Whites (45.05% vs. 47.85%) Blacks, upstaged. Whites (16.49% vs. 14.35%) Blacks, downstaged. The remaining, 38.46 and 37.79% patients had their stages unchanged. With a median follow-up of 54 months, the Black patients showed better stage-by-stage 5-year OS rates using 8th edition compared to the 7th edition (p = 0.000). Among the Whites, those who were stage IIIA in the 7th but became stage IB in the 8th had a better prognosis than stages IIA and IIB in the 8th (p = 0.000). The 8th showed complex results (p = 0.176) compared to DFS estimated using the 7th edition (p = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: The WRP exists with significant variability in the move from the AJCC 7th to the 8th edition in BC staging (both White and Black patients). We suggest that caution needs to be exercised when results are compared across staging systems to account for the WRP in the interpretation of the data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Racial disparities; Will Rogers phenomenon

Year:  2021        PMID: 34001038     DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08125-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


  22 in total

1.  The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging.

Authors:  Mahul B Amin; Frederick L Greene; Stephen B Edge; Carolyn C Compton; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Robert K Brookland; Laura Meyer; Donna M Gress; David R Byrd; David P Winchester
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM.

Authors:  Stephen B Edge; Carolyn C Compton
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer subtypes in the National Cancer Data Base (2010-2011).

Authors:  Helmneh M Sineshaw; Mia Gaudet; Elizabeth M Ward; W Dana Flanders; Carol Desantis; Chun Chieh Lin; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lyndsay N Harris; Nofisat Ismaila; Lisa M McShane; Fabrice Andre; Deborah E Collyar; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Elizabeth H Hammond; Nicole M Kuderer; Minetta C Liu; Robert G Mennel; Catherine Van Poznak; Robert C Bast; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Social determinants of breast cancer risk, stage, and survival.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer.

Authors:  A R Feinstein; D M Sosin; C K Wells
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-06-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Rethinking TNM: breast cancer TNM classification for treatment decision-making and research.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Giuseppe Viale; Nicole Rotmensz; Aron Goldhirsch
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  Validation of the new AJCC eighth edition of the TNM classification for breast cancer with a single-center breast cancer cohort.

Authors:  Ji-Yeon Kim; Ji Eun Lim; Hae Hyun Jung; Soo Youn Cho; Eun Yoon Cho; Se Kyung Lee; Jong Han Yu; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Won Kim; Seok Jin Nam; Yeon Hee Park; Jin Seok Ahn; Young-Hyuck Im
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Comparison of the 7th and 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems for breast cancer patients: a Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Analysis.

Authors:  Nan Shao; Chuanbo Xie; Yawei Shi; Runyi Ye; Jianting Long; Huijuan Shi; Zhen Shan; Alastair M Thompson; Ying Lin
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer.

Authors:  Sae Byul Lee; Guiyun Sohn; Jisun Kim; Il Yong Chung; Jong Won Lee; Hee Jeong Kim; Beom Seok Ko; Byung Ho Son; Sei-Hyun Ahn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.