Literature DB >> 33999296

Repeatability and Biofidelity of a Physical Surrogate Neck Model Fit to a Hybrid III Head.

Samantha MacGillivray1, Gabriella Wynn2, Megan Ogle1, Julia Shore1, Jason P Carey1, Christopher R Dennison3.   

Abstract

In helmet impact testing, parameters including acceleration and velocity are measured using instrumented head-neck models that are meant to be mechanically realistic (i.e. biofidelic) stand-ins, or surrogates, for humans. Currently available models of the human neck are designed primarily for application in automotive crash testing, and their applicability in assessment of helmets is often questioned. The object of the present work is to document the mechanical design, repeatability, and biofidelity in low speed impact of a new neck model that we apply with a Hybrid III head. Focusing on Hybrid III head kinematics measured during impacts at 2 to 6 m/s, the co-efficient of variance of repeated measures of kinematics was generally less than 10%. Differences in kinematics between identical copies of the neck was less than 20% when tested with helmets, and less than 7% when the head was not helmeted. In parallel testing using a Hybrid III head-neck, the co-efficient of variance in repeated measures was less than 4% and the kinematics significantly differed from those measured using the new neck. CORAplus scores for the new neck were approximately 0.70 when compared against data for human subjects with passive neck muscles experiencing impact at 2 m/s.
© 2021. Biomedical Engineering Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain injury; Concussions; Head kinematics; Helmet assessment; Impact; Test dummies

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33999296     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-021-02786-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of biomechanical head-neck responses of hybrid III dummy and whole body cadaver during inverted drops.

Authors:  A Sances; S Kumaresan
Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum       Date:  2001

2.  The Effect of Muscle Activation on Head Kinematics During Non-injurious Head Impacts in Human Subjects.

Authors:  Kristen A Reynier; Ahmed Alshareef; Erin J Sanchez; Daniel F Shedd; Samuel R Walton; Nicholas K Erdman; Benjamin T Newman; J Sebastian Giudice; Michael J Higgins; James R Funk; Donna K Broshek; Thomas J Druzgal; Jacob E Resch; Matthew B Panzer
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Concussions among United States high school and collegiate athletes.

Authors:  Luke M Gessel; Sarah K Fields; Christy L Collins; Randall W Dick; R Dawn Comstock
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  A proposed new biomechanical head injury assessment function - the maximum power index.

Authors:  J A Newman; N Shewchenko; E Welbourne
Journal:  Stapp Car Crash J       Date:  2000-11

5.  WorldSID Dummy Head-Neck Biofidelity Response.

Authors:  Bernard Been; Mat Philippens; Ronald de Lange; Michiel van Ratingen
Journal:  Stapp Car Crash J       Date:  2004-11

6.  Biofidelity Evaluation of the THOR and Hybrid III 50th Percentile Male Frontal Impact Anthropomorphic Test Devices.

Authors:  Daniel Parent; Matthew Craig; Kevin Moorhouse
Journal:  Stapp Car Crash J       Date:  2017-11

7.  Hockey STAR: A Methodology for Assessing the Biomechanical Performance of Hockey Helmets.

Authors:  Bethany Rowson; Steven Rowson; Stefan M Duma
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.934

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Best Practices for Conducting Physical Reconstructions of Head Impacts in Sport.

Authors:  James R Funk; Andrew S McIntosh; Chris Withnall; Michael Wonnacott; Ron Jadischke
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Effect of helmet design on impact performance of industrial safety helmets.

Authors:  Michael Bottlang; Gina DiGiacomo; Stanley Tsai; Steven Madey
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-07-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.