Literature DB >> 33998333

The Action Scales Model: A conceptual tool to identify key points for action within complex adaptive systems.

James D Nobles1, Duncan Radley2, Oliver T Mytton3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systems thinking is integral to working effectively within complex systems, such as those which drive the current population levels of overweight and obesity. It is increasingly recognised that a systems approach - which corrals public, private, voluntary and community sector organisations to make their actions and efforts coherent - is necessary to address the complex drivers of obesity. Identifying, implementing and evaluating actions within complex adaptive systems is challenging, and may differ from previous approaches used in public health.
METHODS: Within this conceptual article, we present the Action Scales Model (ASM). The ASM is a simple tool to help policymakers, practitioners and evaluators to conceptualise, identify and appraise actions within complex adaptive systems. We developed this model using our collective expertise and experience in working with local government authority stakeholders on the Public Health England Whole Systems Obesity programme. It aligns with, and expands upon, previous models such as the Intervention Level Framework, the Iceberg Model and Donella Meadows' 12 places to intervene within a system.
RESULTS: The ASM describes four levels (synonymous with leverage points) to intervene within a system, with deeper levels providing greater potential for changing how the system functions. Levels include events, structures, goals and beliefs. We also present how the ASM can be used to support practice and policy, and finish by highlighting its utility as an evaluative aid. DISCUSSION: This practical tool was designed to support those working at the front line of systems change efforts, and while we use the population prevalence of obesity as an outcome of a complex adaptive system, the ASM and the associated principles can be applied to other issues. We hope that the ASM encourages people to think differently about the systems that they work within and to identify new and potentially more impactful opportunities to leverage change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complex adaptive systems; complex intervention; complexity; health policy; leverage points; systems science

Year:  2021        PMID: 33998333     DOI: 10.1177/17579139211006747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Public Health        ISSN: 1757-9147


  7 in total

1.  Navigating the river(s) of systems change: a multi-methods, qualitative evaluation exploring the implementation of a systems approach to physical activity in Gloucestershire, England.

Authors:  James Nobles; Charlotte Fox; Alan Inman-Ward; Tom Beasley; Sabi Redwood; Russ Jago; Charlie Foster
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  A systems thinking approach to understanding youth active recreation.

Authors:  Harriet Koorts; Paul M Salmon; Christopher T V Swain; Samuel Cassar; David Strickland; Jo Salmon
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 8.915

3.  Ripple effects mapping: capturing the wider impacts of systems change efforts in public health.

Authors:  James Nobles; Jessica Wheeler; Kirsty Dunleavy-Harris; Richard Holmes; Alan Inman-Ward; Alexandra Potts; Jennifer Hall; Sabi Redwood; Russell Jago; Charlie Foster
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  The ENCOMPASS framework: a practical guide for the evaluation of public health programmes in complex adaptive systems.

Authors:  Angie Luna Pinzon; Karien Stronks; Coosje Dijkstra; Carry Renders; Teatske Altenburg; Karen den Hertog; Stef P J Kremers; Mai J M Chinapaw; Arnoud P Verhoeff; Wilma Waterlander
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  The Public Health 12 framework: interpreting the 'Meadows 12 places to act in a system' for use in public health.

Authors:  Kristy A Bolton; Jillian Whelan; Penny Fraser; Colin Bell; Steven Allender; Andrew D Brown
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2022-03-07

Review 6.  A Theoretical Perspective on Why Socioeconomic Health Inequalities Are Persistent: Building the Case for an Effective Approach.

Authors:  Lisa Wilderink; Ingrid Bakker; Albertine J Schuit; Jacob C Seidell; Ioana A Pop; Carry M Renders
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Using systems science methods to enhance the work of national and local walking partnerships: practical insights from Ireland.

Authors:  Dylan D Power; Barry M Lambe; Niamh M Murphy
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.424

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.