Literature DB >> 35940842

Navigating the river(s) of systems change: a multi-methods, qualitative evaluation exploring the implementation of a systems approach to physical activity in Gloucestershire, England.

James Nobles1,2, Charlotte Fox3, Alan Inman-Ward4, Tom Beasley4, Sabi Redwood5,2, Russ Jago5,2,6, Charlie Foster6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Systems approaches aim to change the environments in which people live, through cross-sectoral working, by harnessing the complexity of the problem. This paper sought to identify: (1) the strategies which support the implementation of We Can Move (WCM), (2) the barriers to implementation, (3) key contextual factors that influence implementation and (4) impacts associated with WCM.
DESIGN: A multi-methods evaluation of WCM was completed between April 2019 and April 2021. Ripple Effects Mapping (REM) and semi-structured interviewers were used. Framework and content analysis were systematically applied to the dataset.
SETTING: WCM-a physical activity orientated systems approach being implemented in Gloucestershire, England. PARTICIPANTS: 31 stakeholder interviews and 25 stakeholders involved in 15 REM workshops.
RESULTS: A white-water rafting analogy was developed to present the main findings. The successful implementation of WCM required a facilitative, well-connected and knowledgeable guide (ie, the lead organisation), a crew (ie, wider stakeholders) who's vision and agenda aligned with WCM's purpose, and a flexible delivery approach that could respond to ever-changing nature of the river (ie, local and national circumstances). The context surrounding WCM further strengthened and hampered its implementation. Barriers included evaluative difficulties, a difference in stakeholder and organisational perspectives, misaligned expectations and understandings of WCM, and COVID-19 implications (COVID-19 also presented as a facilitative factor). WCM was said to strengthen cohesion and collaboration between partners, benefit other agendas and policies (eg, mental health, town planning, inequality), and improve physical activity opportunities and environments.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper is one of the first to evaluate a systems approach to increasing physical activity. We highlight key strategies and contextual factors that influenced the implementation of WCM and demonstrate some of the wider benefits from such approaches. Further research and methodologies are required to build the evidence base surrounding systems approaches in Public Health. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health policy; organisation of health services; public health; qualitative research; social medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35940842      PMCID: PMC9364398          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   3.006


  42 in total

1.  The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases.

Authors:  Ding Ding; Kenny D Lawson; Tracy L Kolbe-Alexander; Eric A Finkelstein; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Willem van Mechelen; Michael Pratt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Whole of Systems Approaches to Physical Activity Policy and Practice in Australia: The ASAPa Project Overview and Initial Systems Map.

Authors:  William Bellew; Ben J Smith; Tracy Nau; Karen Lee; Lindsey Reece; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2020-01-01

3.  Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy.

Authors:  I-Min Lee; Eric J Shiroma; Felipe Lobelo; Pekka Puska; Steven N Blair; Peter T Katzmarzyk
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Strengthening complex systems for chronic disease prevention: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lori Baugh Littlejohns; Andrew Wilson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Qualitative process evaluation from a complex systems perspective: A systematic review and framework for public health evaluators.

Authors:  Elizabeth McGill; Dalya Marks; Vanessa Er; Tarra Penney; Mark Petticrew; Matt Egan
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Opportunities to engage health system leaders in whole systems approaches to physical activity in England.

Authors:  E L Bird; D Evans; S Gray; E Atherton; J Blackshaw; M Brannan; N Corrigan; D Weiner
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Ripple effects mapping: capturing the wider impacts of systems change efforts in public health.

Authors:  James Nobles; Jessica Wheeler; Kirsty Dunleavy-Harris; Richard Holmes; Alan Inman-Ward; Alexandra Potts; Jennifer Hall; Sabi Redwood; Russell Jago; Charlie Foster
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.

Authors:  Nicola K Gale; Gemma Heath; Elaine Cameron; Sabina Rashid; Sabi Redwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.

Authors:  Graham F Moore; Suzanne Audrey; Mary Barker; Lyndal Bond; Chris Bonell; Wendy Hardeman; Laurence Moore; Alicia O'Cathain; Tannaze Tinati; Daniel Wight; Janis Baird
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-03-19

10.  What are the elements of a whole system approach to community-centred public health? A qualitative study with public health leaders in England's local authority areas.

Authors:  Jude Stansfield; Jane South; Tom Mapplethorpe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.