| Literature DB >> 33995763 |
Agbor Nathan Emeh1, Dickson Shey Nsagha1, Hermann Ngouakam1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: low socioeconomic status is a risk factor for maternal death and contraceptive use has been shown to reduce maternal deaths in those poor settings. Despite the tremendous benefits of contraceptives in the regulation of reproductive health indicators, its use in less developed countries continue to remain unacceptably low. The purpose of this study was primarily to assess the contraceptive method mix and then determine the predictors of contraceptive use in the Cameroon Development Corporation (CDC) plantation camps.Entities:
Keywords: Socio-demographic; contraceptive method mix; determinants; reproductive health
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33995763 PMCID: PMC8077642 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.156.22357
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Figure 1layout of Tiko CDC camps
Figure 2Pena Mboko CDC plantation camps
socio-demographic characteristics of women aged 15-49 in Tiko and CDC plantation camps
| Variables | Tiko №(%) | Pena Mboko №(%) | Total №(%) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Range (years) | |||||
| < 25 | 103(30.9) | 77(25.6) | 180(28.4) | 0.001 | |
| 25-35 | 107(32.1) | 139(46.2) | 246(38.8) | ||
| >35 | 123(36.9) | 85(28.2) | 208(32.8) | ||
| Total | 333 (100) | 301(100) | 634(100) | ||
| Marital Status | |||||
| Married | 167(50.2) | 168(55.8) | 335(52.8) | 0.294 | |
| Co-habiting | 42(12.6) | 37(12.3) | 79(12.5) | ||
| Single | 107(32.1) | 77(25.6) | 184(29) | ||
| Divorced/Widowed | 17(5.1) | 19(6.3) | 36(5.7) | ||
| Total | 333(100) | 301(100) | 634(100) | ||
| Education Level | |||||
| None | 77(23.1) | 96(31.9) | 173(27.3) | 0.035 | |
| Primary | 142(42.6) | 123(40.9) | 265(41.8) | ||
| Secondary | 62(18.6) | 52(17.3) | 114(18) | ||
| Tertiary | 52(15.6) | 30(10) | 82(12.9) | ||
| Total | 333(100) | 301(100) | 634(100) | ||
| Religion | |||||
| Catholic | 81(24.3) | 105(34.9) | 186(29.3) | 0.004 | |
| Pentecostals | 236(70.9) | 189(62.8) | 425(67) | ||
| Muslim | 7(2.1) | 6(2) | 13(2.1) | ||
| None | 9(2.7) | 1(0.3) | 10(1.6) | ||
| Total | 333(100) | 301(100) | 634(100) | ||
| Income Level (FCFA) | |||||
| <25000 | 70(21) | 70(23.3) | 140(22.1) | 0.511 | |
| 25000-50000 | 153(45.9) | 129(42.9) | 282(44.5) | ||
| 50000-75000 | 78(23.4) | 80(26.6) | 158(24.9) | ||
| >75000 | 32(9.6) | 22(7.3) | 54(8.5) | ||
| Total | 333(100) | 301(100) | 634(100) | ||
contraceptive method mix among contraceptive users in CDC plantation camps
| Contraceptive methods: n(%) | MC | FC | OCP | INJ | IUD | IMP | WM | RHY | EP | TL | VAS | Total (n=400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male condom (MC) | 46(11.5) | 1(0.3) | 1(0.3) | 1(0.3) | 0(0.0) | 2(0.5) | 9(2.3) | 47 (11.8) | 1(0.3) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.3) | 109 (27.2) |
| Female Condom (FC) | 1(0.3) | 2(0.5) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.3) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 4 (1.0) |
| OCP | 1(0.3) | 0(0.0) | 21(5.3) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 2(0.5) | 3(0.8) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 27(6.8) |
| Injectables (INJ) | 1(0.3) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 44(11.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 4(1.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 49(12.2) |
| IUD | 0(0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 4(1.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 4(1.0) |
| Implant (IMP) | 2(0.5) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 61(15.3) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 63(15.8) |
| WM | 9(2.3) | 0(0.0) | 2(0.5) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 8(2.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 19(4.8) |
| Rhythm method (RHY) | 47(11.8) | 1(0.3) | 3(0.8) | 4(1.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 8(2.0) | 132 (33.0) | 1(0.3) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 196(49) |
| Emergency pills (EP) | 1(0.3) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.3) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 2(0.5) |
| Tubal ligation (TL) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.3) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.3) |
| Vasectomy (VAS) | 1(0.3) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.3) |
| Total (n=400) | 109(27.2) | 4(1.0) | 27(6.8) | 49(12.2) | 4(1.0) | 63(15.8) | 19(4.8) | 196(49) | 2(0.5) | 1(0.3) | 1(0.3) | 475 (100) |
OCP=oral contraceptive pills; IUD= intrauterine device; WM= withdrawal method
Figure 3a chart of frequency of contraceptive method mix in the CDC plantation camp
socio-demographic and reproductive health determinants of general contraceptive use among women aged 15-49 years in the CDC plantation camps
| Variables | Unadjusted OR [95%CI] | p-value | Adjusted OR [95%CI] | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participant having age < 35 years (Y/N) | 1.32[0.94-1.86] | 0.11 | 0.71[0.50-1.00] | 0.04* |
| Living with a partner (Y/N) | 1.64[1.17-2.30] | 0.00* | 0.62[0.44-0.87] | 0.01* |
| Level of education below primary (Y/N) | 1.20[0.85-1.69] | 0.31 | 0.91[0.64-1.30] | 0.61 |
| Pentecostals (Y/N) | 0.75[0.53-1.07] | 0.11 | 1.35[0.95-1.92] | 0.09 |
| Having income level < 50000FCFA (Y/N) | 0.91[0.64-1.28] | 0.57 | 1.10[0.78-1.55] | 0.59 |
| Living in Tiko CDC Camp (Y/N) | 0.80[0.58-1.11] | 0.18 | 1.22[0.88-1.69] | 0.24 |
| Age of getting into union< 30 years (Y/N) | 2.26[1.06-4.78] | 0.03* | 0.50[0.23-1.07] | 0.07 |
| First Sexual Contact age < 20 years (Y/N) | 1.13[0.57-2.26] | 0.73 | 0.98[0.46-2.09] | 0.95 |
| Nulli/primiparous (Y/N) | 0.76[0.54-1.08] | 0.12 | 1.21[0.76-1.94] | 0.42 |
| Having < 3 Children (Y/N) | 0.71[0.47-1.07] | 0.10 | 1.32[0.87-2.02] | 0.20 |
| Last pregnancy outcome: Singleton (Y/N) | 1.53[0.90-2.61] | 0.12 | 0.62[0.36-1.07] | 0.09 |
| Last pregnancy :< 5 years ago (Y/N) | 1.48[1.03-2.15] | 0.04* | 0.70[0.48-1.02] | 0.06 |
| Number of abortions: < 3 Abortions (Y/N) | 2.61[0.73-9.33] | 0.14 | 0.39[0.11-1.40] | 0.15 |
| Intend Getting Pregnant at this time (Y/N) | 0.96[0.35-2.68] | 0.94 | 0.96[0.33-2.83] | 0.94 |
= Statistically significant predictors