| Literature DB >> 30249223 |
Thobani Ntshiqa1,2,3, Alfred Musekiwa4, Mandla Mlotshwa5,6, Kerry Mangold7, Carl Reddy5, Seymour Williams5,4,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In South Africa, young women are at disproportionate risk of HIV infection with about 2363 new infections per week in 2015. Proper condom use is one of the most effective HIV/AIDS prevention strategies among sexually active persons. Understanding factors associated with male condom use in this key population group is important to curb the spread of HIV. This study determined practices and predictors of male condom use among sexually active young women in South Africa.Entities:
Keywords: Condom use; HIV prevention; Predictor; Sexually active; South Africa; Young women
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30249223 PMCID: PMC6154873 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6039-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Demographic characteristics of sexually active young women aged 16–24 years, National HIV Communication Survey, South Africa, 2012
| Variable | Age groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 16–19 years - | 20–24 years - | N (%) |
| 247 (24.0%) | 784 (76.0%) | 1031 (100.0%) | |
| Race | |||
| Black | 213 (86.2%) | 692 (88.3%) | 905 (87.8%) |
| Coloured | 33 (13.4%) | 81 (10.3%) | 114 (11.1%) |
| White | 1 (0.4%) | 9 (1.2%) | 10 (1.0%) |
| Indian | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (0.3%) | 2 (0.2%) |
| Marital status | |||
| Single | 127 (51.4%) | 303 (38.7%) | 430 (41.7%) |
| Stable relationship | 92 (37.3%) | 289 (36.9%) | 381 (37.0%) |
| Cohabitation | 20 (8.1%) | 12 (15.3%) | 140 (13.6%) |
| Married, staying with husband | 1 (0.4%) | 49 (6.3%) | 50 (4.9%) |
| Married, not staying with husband | 1 (0.4%) | 10 (1.3%) | 11 (1.1%) |
| Divorced | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (0.3%) | 2 (0.2%) |
| Other | 6 (2.4%) | 11 (1.4%) | 17 (1.7%) |
| Province | |||
| Eastern Cape | 19 (7.7%) | 73 (9.3%) | 92 (8.9%) |
| Free State | 22 (8.9%) | 67 (8.6%) | 89 (8.6%) |
| Gauteng | 49 (19.8%) | 150 (19.1%) | 199 (19.3%) |
| KwaZulu-Natal | 43 (17.4%) | 161 (20.5%) | 204 (19.8%) |
| Limpopo | 19 (7.7%) | 81 (10.3%) | 100 (9.7%) |
| Mpumalanga | 33 (13.4%) | 81 (10.3%) | 114 (11.1%) |
| North West | 18 (7.3%) | 47 (6.0%) | 65 (6.3%) |
| Northern Cape | 8 (3.2%) | 13 (1.7%) | 21 (2.0%) |
| Western Cape | 36 (14.6%) | 111 (14.2%) | 147 (14.3%) |
| Settlement type | |||
| Urban formal | 84 (34.0%) | 257 (32.8%) | 341 (33.1%) |
| Urban informal | 92 (37.3%) | 299 (38.1%) | 391 (37.9%) |
| Peri-urban | 29 (11.7%) | 96 (12.2%) | 125 (12.1%) |
| Tribal settlement | 35 (14.2%) | 116 (14.8%) | 151 (14.7%) |
| Farming | 7 (2.8%) | 16 (2.0%) | 23 (2.2%) |
| Education | |||
| No schooling | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (0.3%) | 2 (0.2%) |
| Primary | 9 (3.7%) | 27 (3.4%) | 36 (3.5%) |
| Grade 11 | 148 (60.2%) | 307 (39.2%) | 455 (44.2%) |
| Matric | 80 (32.5%) | 365 (46.6%) | 445 (43.2%) |
| Tertiary | 9 (3.7%) | 83 (10.6%) | 92 (8.9%) |
| Employment status | |||
| Unemployed | 94 (38.1%) | 512 (65.3%) | 606 (58.8%) |
| Employed | 15 (6.1%) | 136 (17.4%) | 151 (14.7%) |
| Student | 135 (54.7%) | 128 (16.3%) | 263 (25.5%) |
| Other | 3 (1.2%) | 8 (1.0%) | 11 (1.1%) |
| Socio-economic status | |||
| High | 71 (28.7%) | 201 (25.6%) | 272 (26.4%) |
| Medium | 94 (38.1%) | 347 (44.3%) | 441 (42.8%) |
| Low | 82 (33.2%) | 236 (30.1%) | 318 (30.8%) |
| Food security | |||
| Insecure | 50 (20.2%) | 125 (15.9%) | 175 (17.0%) |
| Secure | 197 (79.8%) | 659 (84.1%) | 856 (83.0%) |
Fig. 1Male condom use at last sex by province among the sexually active young women aged 16–24 years, National HIV Communication Survey, South Africa, 2012
Fig. 2Male condom use at last sex by sexual behavioral practices among the sexually active young women aged 16–24 years, National HIV Communication Survey, South Africa, 2012
Factors associated with male condom use among sexually active young women aged 16–24 years, National HIV Communication Survey, South Africa, 2012
| Variable | Condom use at last sex N | Non-condom use at last sex N | Bivariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude OR | 95% CI | Adjusted OR | 95% CI | |||||
| Age group | ||||||||
| 16–19 years | 169 | 78 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| 20–24 years | 426 | 355 | 0.6 | 0.4–0.7 | < 0.001 | _ | _ | _ |
| Race | ||||||||
| White | 8 | 4 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Black | 538 | 365 | 0.7 | 0.2–2.5 | < 0.001 | _ | _ | _ |
| Coloured | 49 | 64 | 0.4 | 0.1–1.3 | 0.001 | |||
| Marital status | ||||||||
| Married | 14 | 47 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Single | 265 | 164 | 5.7 | 3.0–10.6 | 0.735 | _ | _ | _ |
| Stable relationship | 243 | 136 | 6.3 | 3.3–11.7 | 0.682 | _ | _ | _ |
| Cohabitation | 60 | 80 | 2.6 | 1.3–5.2 | 0.84 | _ | _ | _ |
| Settlement type | ||||||||
| Farming settlement | 12 | 11 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Urban formal | 207 | 131 | 1.7 | 0.7–4.0 | < 0.001 | _ | _ | _ |
| Urban informal | 232 | 159 | 1.6 | 0.7–3.7 | 0.6 | _ | _ | _ |
| Peri-urban | 69 | 56 | 1.3 | 0.6–3.3 | 0.24 | _ | _ | _ |
| Tribal settlement | 75 | 76 | 1.1 | 0.4–2.6 | 0.017 | _ | _ | _ |
| Employment status | ||||||||
| Unemployed | 327 | 277 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| Employed | 78 | 72 | 0.9 | 0.6–1.3 | 0.638 | 0.8 | 0.5–1.2 | 0.242 |
| Student | 184 | 79 | 2.0 | 1.4–2.7 | < 0.001 | 1.6 | 1.2–2.3 | 0.005 |
| Level of Education | ||||||||
| Primary | 17 | 19 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Grade 11 | 245 | 209 | 1.3 | 0.7–2.6 | 0.436 | _ | _ | _ |
| Matric | 279 | 165 | 1.9 | 1.0–3.7 | 0.067 | _ | _ | _ |
| Tertiary | 54 | 37 | 1.6 | 0.8–3.5 | 0.217 | _ | _ | _ |
| Multiple sexual partnersa | ||||||||
| No | 536 | 398 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Yes | 59 | 35 | 1.3 | 0.8–1.9 | 0.315 | _ | _ | _ |
| Sexual debut | ||||||||
| 0–15 years | 73 | 85 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| 16–17 years | 248 | 183 | 1.6 | 1.1–2.3 | 0.015 | 1.4 | 1.0–2.1 | 0.072 |
| 18–19 years | 200 | 124 | 1.9 | 1.3–2.8 | 0.001 | 1.8 | 1.2–2.7 | 0.008 |
| 20–24 years | 74 | 41 | 2.1 | 1.3–3.4 | 0.003 | 2.1 | 1.2–3.7 | 0.006 |
| Transactional sexa | ||||||||
| No | 547 | 387 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Yes | 48 | 46 | 0.7 | 0.5–1.1 | 0.162 | _ | _ | _ |
| Intergenerational sexa | ||||||||
| No | 373 | 239 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Yes | 222 | 194 | 0.7 | 0.6–0.9 | 0.016 | _ | _ | _ |
| Living separately from a regular partner | ||||||||
| Same house | 51 | 103 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| Same neighborhood | 188 | 128 | 3.0 | 2.0–4.4 | < 0.001 | 1.8 | 1.0–3.2 | 0.038 |
| Same town or area | 213 | 115 | 3.7 | 2.5–5.6 | < 0.001 | 2.2 | 1.2–3.9 | 0.006 |
| Same province | 92 | 57 | 3.3 | 2.0–5.2 | < 0.001 | 1.8 | 1.0–3.3 | 0.071 |
| Different province | 46 | 26 | 3.6 | 2.0–6.4 | < 0.001 | 2.4 | 1.2–4.8 | 0.017 |
| Relationship type | ||||||||
| Main partner | 424 | 275 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| A friend | 39 | 23 | 1.1 | 0.6–1.9 | < 0.001 | 4.5 | 1.8–11.7 | 0.002 |
| Someone known for while | 58 | 27 | 1.4 | 0.9–2.3 | < 0.001 | 5.3 | 2.1–13.5 | < 0.001 |
| Recent acquaintance | 18 | 5 | 2.3 | 0.9–6.4 | < 0.001 | 8.1 | 2.2–29.8 | 0.002 |
| Radio | ||||||||
| Never listeneda | 171 | 145 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Listened¥ | 424 | 288 | 1.2 | 1.0. - 1.6 | 0.104 | _ | _ | _ |
| TV | ||||||||
| Never watcheda | 87 | 84 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Watcheda | 508 | 349 | 1.4 | 1.0–2.0 | 0.043 | _ | _ | _ |
| Magazine | ||||||||
| Never reada | 347 | 258 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Reada | 248 | 175 | 1.1 | 0.8–1.4 | 0.684 | _ | _ | _ |
| Newspaper | ||||||||
| Never reada | 268 | 188 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Read¥ | 327 | 245 | 0.9 | 0.7–1.2 | 0.605 | _ | _ | _ |
| Internet | ||||||||
| Had no accessa | 362 | 322 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| Had accessa | 233 | 111 | 1.9 | 1.4–2.4 | < 0.001 | 1.5 | 1.1–2.1 | 0.006 |
| Intersexions | ||||||||
| Not exposeda | 227 | 220 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| Exposeda | 368 | 213 | 1.7 | 1.3–2.2 | < 0.001 | 1.3 | 1.0–1.7 | 0.056 |
| 4Play:Sex Tips for Girls | ||||||||
| Not exposeda | 467 | 337 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Exposeda | 128 | 96 | 1.0 | 0.7–1.3 | 0.801 | _ | _ | _ |
| Brothers for Life | ||||||||
| Not exposeda | 238 | 227 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Exposeda | 357 | 206 | 1.7 | 1.3–2.1 | < 0.001 | _ | _ | _ |
| Scrutinize | ||||||||
| Not exposeda | 106 | 106 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Exposeda | 489 | 327 | 1.5 | 1.1–2.0 | 0.009 | _ | _ | _ |
| Soul City | ||||||||
| Not exposeda | 240 | 192 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Exposeda | 355 | 241 | 1.2 | 0.9–1.5 | 0.199 | _ | _ | _ |
| loveLife | ||||||||
| Not exposeda | 560 | 412 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Exposeda | 35 | 21 | 1.2 | 0.7–2.1 | 0.472 | _ | _ | _ |
| Siyanqoba Beat it! | ||||||||
| Not exposeda | 247 | 234 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Exposeda | 348 | 199 | 1.7 | 1.3–2.1 | < 0.001 | _ | _ | _ |
| We BEAT TB | ||||||||
| Not exposeda | 188 | 182 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Exposeda | 407 | 251 | 1.6 | 1.2–2.0 | 0.001 | _ | _ | _ |
| i-Life | ||||||||
| Not exposeda | 571 | 426 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| Exposed¥ | 24 | 7 | 2.6 | 1.1–6.0 | 0.031 | 3.1 | 1.2–8.6 | 0.025 |
aIn the last 12 months
Demographic and sexual behavioral practices predicting HIV infection among sexually active young women aged 16–24 years, National HIV Communication Survey, South Africa, 2012
| Variable | HIV + ve | Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | Crude OR | 95% CI | p-value | Adjusted OR | 95% CI | ||
| Age group | ||||||||
| 16–19 years | 5 | 3.1 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| 20–24 years | 41 | 7.2 | 2.4 | 0.9–6.3 | 0.065 | 7.3 | 2.3–23.1 | 0.001 |
| Province | ||||||||
| Eastern Cape | 2 | 2.7 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| Free State | 8 | 11.6 | 4.8 | 1.0–23.4 | 0.053 | 4.2 | 0.8–28.9 | 0.085 |
| Gauteng | 7 | 5.0 | 1.9 | 0.4–9.6 | 0.418 | 4.0 | 0.7–23.7 | 0.125 |
| KwaZulu-Natal | 11 | 7.3 | 2.9 | 0.6–13.3 | 0.178 | 5.4 | 1.0–30.0 | 0.056 |
| Limpopo | 4 | 7.4 | 2.9 | 0.5–16.6 | 0.226 | 4.1 | 0.6–29.5 | 0.166 |
| Mpumalanga | 7 | 10.6 | 4.3 | 0.9–21.6 | 0.074 | 8.3 | 1.4–51.0 | 0.022 |
| North West | 1 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.1–13.5 | 0.895 | 1.5 | 0.1–22.6 | 0.768 |
| Northern Cape | 1 | 10.0 | 4.1 | 0.3–49.3 | 0.272 | 4.6 | 0.3–83.5 | 0.300 |
| Western Cape | 5 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 0.3–7.7 | 0.663 | 2.5 | 0.4–16.0 | 0.323 |
| Settlement type | ||||||||
| Urban formal | 11 | 4.6 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Urban informal | 24 | 8.0 | 1.8 | 0.9–3.8 | 0.111 | _ | _ | _ |
| Peri-urban | 7 | 8.3 | 1.9 | 0.7–5.1 | 0.200 | _ | _ | _ |
| Tribal settlement | 3 | 3.4 | 0.7 | 0.2–2.7 | 0.634 | _ | _ | _ |
| Farming | 1 | 7.7 | 1.7 | 0.2–14.6 | 0.609 | _ | _ | _ |
| Housing type | ||||||||
| Formal house | 7 | 3.4 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Mostly formal | 16 | 8.3 | 2.5 | 1.0–6.3 | 0.045 | _ | _ | _ |
| Mostly informal | 16 | 8.7 | 2.7 | 1.1–6.6 | 0.035 | _ | _ | _ |
| Squatter camp | 2 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.2–4.0 | 0.802 | _ | _ | _ |
| Traditional house | 5 | 7.9 | 2.4 | 0.7–7.9 | 0.142 | _ | _ | _ |
| Level of Education | ||||||||
| Primary | 4 | 26.7 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| Grade 11 | 27 | 8.0 | 0.2 | 0.1–0.8 | 0.020 | 0.2 | 0.03–0.73 | 0.017 |
| Matric | 14 | 4.6 | 0.1 | < 0.0–0.5 | 0.002 | 0.1 | 0.02–0.56 | 0.007 |
| Tertiary | 1 | 1.4 | < 0.01 | < 0.01–0.4 | 0.006 | 0.04 | < 0.01–0.51 | 0.013 |
| Marital status | ||||||||
| Single | 26 | 7.7 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| Stable relationship | 11 | 4.5 | 0.6 | 0.3–1.2 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.2–1.3 | 0.156 |
| Cohabitation | 4 | 4.4 | 0.5 | 0.2–1.6 | 0.278 | 0.2 | 0.1–0.9 | 0.028 |
| Married | 5 | 9.8 | 1.3 | 0.5–3.6 | 0.609 | 0.8 | 0.2–3.6 | 0.798 |
| Employment status | ||||||||
| Unemployed | 31 | 7.0 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Employed | 8 | 8.1 | 1.2 | 0.5–2.6 | 0.693 | _ | _ | _ |
| Student | 7 | 4.0 | 0.6 | 0.2–1.3 | 0.169 | _ | _ | _ |
| Socio-economic status | ||||||||
| High | 7 | 3.7 | 1 | Reference | Reference | _ | _ | _ |
| Medium | 25 | 8.0 | 2.2 | 0.9–5.3 | 0.066 | _ | _ | _ |
| Low | 14 | 6.2 | 1.7 | 0.7–4.3 | 0.255 | _ | _ | _ |
| Food security¥ | ||||||||
| Insecure | 17 | 14.2 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| Secured | 29 | 4.8 | 0.3 | 0.2–0.6 | < 0.001 | 0.3 | 0.2–0.7 | 0.007 |
| Multiple sexual partners¥ | ||||||||
| No | 34 | 5.1 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| Yes | 12 | 18.8 | 4.3 | 2.1–8.7 | < 0.001 | 2.9 | 1.2–7.0 | 0.017 |
| Sexual debut | ||||||||
| 0–15 years | 17 | 15.3 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| 16–17 years | 19 | 6.4 | 0.4 | 0.2–0.8 | 0.006 | 0.3 | 0.1–0.7 | 0.005 |
| 18–19 years | 7 | 2.9 | 0.2 | 0.1–0.4 | < 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.03–0.31 | < 0.001 |
| 20–24 years | 3 | 3.9 | 0.2 | 0.1–0.8 | 0.019 | 0.2 | 0.03–0.70 | 0.014 |
| Transactional sex¥ | ||||||||
| No | 38 | 5.7 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| Yes | 8 | 14.6 | 2.8 | 1.3–6.4 | 0.012 | 1.8 | 0.6–4.6 | 0.313 |
| Intergenerational sex¥ | ||||||||
| No | 19 | 4.4 | 1 | Reference | Reference | 1 | Reference | Reference |
| Yes | 27 | 9.1 | 2.2 | 1.2–4.0 | 0.011 | 2.0 | 1.0–4.0 | 0.047 |
_ Not statistically significant
¥In the last 12 months