Literature DB >> 33995556

Ultrasound grading of thyroid nodules using the BTA U-scoring guidelines - Is there evidence of intra-and interobserver variability?

Michael Couzins1, Stuart Forbes1, Ganesh Vigneswaran1, Indu Mitra2, Elizabeth E Rutherford1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: U-score ultrasound classification (graded U1-U5) is widely used to grade thyroid nodules based on benign and malignant sonographic features. It is well established that ultrasound is an operator-dependent imaging modality and thus more susceptible to subjective variances between operators when using imaging-based scoring systems. We aimed to assess whether there is any intra- or interobserver variability when U-scoring thyroid nodules and whether previous thyroid ultrasound experience has an effect on this variability.
METHODS: A total of 14 ultrasound operators were identified (five experienced thyroid operators, five with intermediate experience and four with no experience) and were asked to U-score images from 20 thyroid cases shown as a single projection, with and without Doppler flow. The cases were subsequently rescored by the 14 operators after six weeks. The first and second round U-scores for the three operator groups were then analysed using Fleiss' kappa to assess interobserver variability and Cochran's Q test to determine any intraobserver variability.
RESULTS: We found no significant interobserver variability on combined assessment of all operators with fair agreement in round 1 (Fleiss' kappa = 0.30, p <0.0001) and slight agreement in round 2 (Fleiss' kappa = 0.19, p < 0.0001). Cochran's Q test revealed no significant intraobserver variability in all 14 operators between round 1 and round 2 (all p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: We found no statistically significant inter- or intraobserver variability in the U-scoring of thyroid nodules between all participants reinforcing the validity of this scoring method in clinical practice, allaying concerns regarding potential subjective biases in reporting.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Thyroid ultrasound; U-score; grading; observer variability; thyroid nodules

Year:  2020        PMID: 33995556      PMCID: PMC8083133          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X20971323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  10 in total

1.  New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid nodules of the thyroid.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Kim; Cheong Soo Park; Woung Youn Chung; Ki Keun Oh; Dong Ik Kim; Jong Tae Lee; Hyung Sik Yoo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Management of thyroid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement.

Authors:  Mary C Frates; Carol B Benson; J William Charboneau; Edmund S Cibas; Orlo H Clark; Beverly G Coleman; John J Cronan; Peter M Doubilet; Douglas B Evans; John R Goellner; Ian D Hay; Barbara S Hertzberg; Charles M Intenzo; R Brooke Jeffrey; Jill E Langer; P Reed Larsen; Susan J Mandel; William D Middleton; Carl C Reading; Steven I Sherman; Franklin N Tessler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Implementation of evidence-based guidelines for thyroid nodule biopsy: a model for establishment of practice standards.

Authors:  Niamh M Hambly; Mithat Gonen; Scott R Gerst; Duan Li; Xiaoyu Jia; Svetlana Mironov; Debra Sarasohn; Stephen E Fleming; Lucy E Hann
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Validation of Three Scoring Risk-Stratification Models for Thyroid Nodules.

Authors:  Su Min Ha; Hye Shin Ahn; Jung Hwan Baek; Hwa Young Ahn; Yun Jae Chung; Bo Youn Cho; Sung Bin Park
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.568

5.  ACR TI-RADS: Pitfalls, Solutions, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Rafel R Tappouni; Jason N Itri; Teresa S McQueen; Neeraj Lalwani; Jao J Ou
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Hossein Gharib; Enrico Papini; Roberto Valcavi; H Jack Baskin; Anna Crescenzi; Massimo E Dottorini; Daniel S Duick; Rinaldo Guglielmi; Carlos Robert Hamilton; Martha A Zeiger; Michele Zini
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.443

7.  Ultrasound characterization for thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology: inter-observer agreement and impact of combining pattern-based and scoring-based classifications in risk stratification.

Authors:  Cesar A Lam; Melissa J McGettigan; Zachary J Thompson; Laila Khazai; Christine H Chung; Barbara A Centeno; Bryan McIver; Pablo Valderrabano
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation--multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Won-Jin Moon; So Lyung Jung; Jeong Hyun Lee; Dong Gyu Na; Jung-Hwan Baek; Young Hen Lee; Jinna Kim; Hyun Sook Kim; Jun Soo Byun; Dong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Sonographically Estimated Risks of Malignancy for Thyroid Nodules Computed with Five Standard Classification Systems: Changes over Time and Their Relation to Malignancy.

Authors:  Giorgio Grani; Livia Lamartina; Marco Biffoni; Laura Giacomelli; Marianna Maranghi; Rosa Falcone; Valeria Ramundo; Vito Cantisani; Sebastiano Filetti; Cosimo Durante
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.568

10.  Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Petros Perros; Kristien Boelaert; Steve Colley; Carol Evans; Rhordi M Evans; Georgina Gerrard Ba; Jackie Gilbert; Barney Harrison; Sarah J Johnson; Thomas E Giles; Laura Moss; Val Lewington; Kate Newbold; Judith Taylor; Rajesh V Thakker; John Watkinson; Graham R Williams
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.478

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.