Literature DB >> 30105949

Sonographically Estimated Risks of Malignancy for Thyroid Nodules Computed with Five Standard Classification Systems: Changes over Time and Their Relation to Malignancy.

Giorgio Grani1, Livia Lamartina1, Marco Biffoni2, Laura Giacomelli2, Marianna Maranghi1, Rosa Falcone1, Valeria Ramundo1, Vito Cantisani3, Sebastiano Filetti1, Cosimo Durante1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over 50% of newly diagnosed thyroid nodules are either cytologically benign or presumed to be benign on the basis of low-suspicion sonographic findings. The strategies used for their long-term surveillance are based mainly on the estimated residual risk of malignancy calculated with various ultrasonographic classification systems (e.g., Thyroid Image Reporting and Data Systems [TIRADS]). We conducted a longitudinal study to evaluate the temporal stability of the initial risk estimates computed with five widely used systems and to determine whether risk class increases during follow-up are indeed predictive of malignancy.
METHODS: We re-analyzed data prospectively collected at a single academic referral center on 232 patients (age: 54.1 ± 13.7 years) with 432 asymptomatic, sonographically or cytologically benign thyroid nodules at baseline (T0) and 122 new nodules that were present five years later (T5). At both time points, the sonographically estimated risk of malignancy was calculated as recommended by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi, the American College of Radiologists' TIRADS, the American Thyroid Association's 2015 practice guidelines, the European Thyroid Association's TIRADS (EU-TIRADS), and the TIRADS of the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (K-TIRADS).
RESULTS: For 57 to 127 (13.2-29.4%) of the original nodules, depending on the system used, the estimated malignancy risk increased over the 5-year interval. Of the nodules whose baseline risk had not warranted cytological assessment, very few (6.3-8.3%) met the criteria for cytology at the 5-year evaluation. Biopsy was indicated for only 4 to 8 (3.3-6.6%) of the new nodules based on T5 risk estimates. Despite these changes, none of the 232 patients was ever diagnosed with a cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-based risk classes of presumably benign thyroid nodules remain fairly stable over time, and changes warranting biopsy are rare indeed. The appearance of new nodules is a frequent event, but very few (<5%) are classified as high risk, and only the 3-7% meet the criteria for cytological assessment. Collectively, these findings support the view that patients with presumably benign thyroid nodules can be safely followed with less intensive protocols.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TIRADS; imaging; multinodular goiter; scoring system; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30105949     DOI: 10.1089/thy.2018.0178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thyroid        ISSN: 1050-7256            Impact factor:   6.568


  7 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnostic system for thyroid nodule sonographic evaluation outperforms the specificity of less experienced examiners.

Authors:  Daniele Fresilli; Giorgio Grani; Maria Luna De Pascali; Gregorio Alagna; Eleonora Tassone; Valeria Ramundo; Valeria Ascoli; Daniela Bosco; Marco Biffoni; Marco Bononi; Vito D'Andrea; Fabrizio Frattaroli; Laura Giacomelli; Yana Solskaya; Giorgia Polti; Patrizia Pacini; Olga Guiban; Raffaele Gallo Curcio; Marcello Caratozzolo; Vito Cantisani
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-04-03

2.  Taller-Than-Wide Shape: A New Definition Improves the Specificity of TIRADS Systems.

Authors:  Giorgio Grani; Livia Lamartina; Valeria Ramundo; Rosa Falcone; Cristiano Lomonaco; Laura Ciotti; Martina Barone; Marianna Maranghi; Vito Cantisani; Sebastiano Filetti; Cosimo Durante
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2019-11-15

3.  Ultrasound grading of thyroid nodules using the BTA U-scoring guidelines - Is there evidence of intra-and interobserver variability?

Authors:  Michael Couzins; Stuart Forbes; Ganesh Vigneswaran; Indu Mitra; Elizabeth E Rutherford
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2020-11-16

4.  Trends in thyroid function testing, neck ultrasound, thyroid fine needle aspiration, and thyroidectomies in North-eastern Italy.

Authors:  L Dal Maso; C Panato; A De Paoli; V Mattioli; D Serraino; R Elisei; G Zoppini; C Gobitti; E Borsatti; E Di Felice; F Falcini; S Ferretti; S Francisci; P Giorgi Rossi; S Guzzinati; G Mazzoleni; D Pierannunzio; S Piffer; S Vaccarella; M Vicentini; M Zorzi; S Franceschi; U Fedeli
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 5.  Contemporary Thyroid Nodule Evaluation and Management.

Authors:  Giorgio Grani; Marialuisa Sponziello; Valeria Pecce; Valeria Ramundo; Cosimo Durante
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Is thyroid nodule location associated with malignancy risk?

Authors:  Valeria Ramundo; Livia Lamartina; Rosa Falcone; Laura Ciotti; Cristiano Lomonaco; Marco Biffoni; Laura Giacomelli; Marianna Maranghi; Cosimo Durante; Giorgio Grani
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2018-11-06

7.  Validating and Comparing C-TIRADS, K-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS in Stratifying the Malignancy Risk of Thyroid Nodules.

Authors:  Qingfang Chen; Mingnan Lin; Size Wu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.055

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.