Literature DB >> 33993762

Social information use and social information waste.

Olivier Morin1,2, Pierre Olivier Jacquet3, Krist Vaesen4, Alberto Acerbi5.   

Abstract

Social information is immensely valuable. Yet we waste it. The information we get from observing other humans and from communicating with them is a cheap and reliable informational resource. It is considered the backbone of human cultural evolution. Theories and models focused on the evolution of social learning show the great adaptive benefits of evolving cognitive tools to process it. In spite of this, human adults in the experimental literature use social information quite inefficiently: they do not take it sufficiently into account. A comprehensive review of the literature on five experimental tasks documented 45 studies showing social information waste, and four studies showing social information being over-used. These studies cover 'egocentric discounting' phenomena as studied by social psychology, but also include experimental social learning studies. Social information waste means that human adults fail to give social information its optimal weight. Both proximal explanations and accounts derived from evolutionary theory leave crucial aspects of the phenomenon unaccounted for: egocentric discounting is a pervasive effect that no single unifying explanation fully captures. Cultural evolutionary theory's insistence on the power and benefits of social influence is to be balanced against this phenomenon. This article is part of the theme issue 'Foundations of cultural evolution'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advice-taking; cultural evolution; egocentric discounting; epistemic vigilance; information cascades; social learning

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33993762      PMCID: PMC8126467          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.671


  33 in total

1.  Advice Taking in Decision Making: Egocentric Discounting and Reputation Formation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  2000-11

2.  A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920-1957.

Authors:  I LORGE; D FOX; J DAVITZ; M BRENNER
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1958-11       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information.

Authors:  Luc-Alain Giraldeau; Thomas J Valone; Jennifer J Templeton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Individual consistency and flexibility in human social information use.

Authors:  Ulf Toelch; Matthew J Bruce; Lesley Newson; Peter J Richerson; Simon M Reader
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The evolutionary basis of human social learning.

Authors:  T J H Morgan; L E Rendell; M Ehn; W Hoppitt; K N Laland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation.

Authors:  Niccolò Pescetelli; Nicholas Yeung
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-10-01

7.  Equality bias impairs collective decision-making across cultures.

Authors:  Ali Mahmoodi; Dan Bang; Karsten Olsen; Yuanyuan Aimee Zhao; Zhenhao Shi; Kristina Broberg; Shervin Safavi; Shihui Han; Majid Nili Ahmadabadi; Chris D Frith; Andreas Roepstorff; Geraint Rees; Bahador Bahrami
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Vigilant conservatism in evaluating communicated information.

Authors:  Emmanuel Trouche; Petter Johansson; Lars Hall; Hugo Mercier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The ecological roots of human susceptibility to social influence: a pre-registered study investigating the impact of early-life adversity.

Authors:  Pierre O Jacquet; Lou Safra; Valentin Wyart; Nicolas Baumard; Coralie Chevallier
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  The cultural dynamics of copycat suicide.

Authors:  Alex Mesoudi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Maintenance of prior behaviour can enhance cultural selection.

Authors:  Bradley Walker; José Segovia Martín; Monica Tamariz; Nicolas Fay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Social influence in adolescence as a double-edged sword.

Authors:  Lucas Molleman; Simon Ciranka; Wouter van den Bos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 5.530

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.