Literature DB >> 33993721

Association of Health Insurance Payer Type and Outcomes After Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: An Analysis of the STS-INTERMACS Registry.

Sameed Ahmed M Khatana1,2,3, Thomas C Hanff1,2, Ashwin S Nathan1,2,3, Elias J Dayoub1,2,3, E Wilson Grandin4,5, J Eduardo Rame6, Alexander C Fanaroff1,2,3, Jay Giri1,2,3, Peter W Groeneveld2,3,7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to the high cost of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy, payer type may be an important factor in determining eligibility. How payer type influences outcomes after LVAD implantation is unclear. We, therefore, aimed to study the association of health insurance payer type with outcomes after durable LVAD implantation.
METHODS: Using STS-INTERMACS (Society of Thoracic Surgeons-Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support), we studied nonelderly adults receiving a durable LVAD from 2016 to 2018 and compared all-cause mortality and postindex hospitalization adverse event episode rate by payer type. Multivariable Fine-Gray and generalized linear models were used to compare the outcomes.
RESULTS: Of the 3251 patients included, 26.0% had Medicaid, 24.9% had Medicare alone, and 49.1% had commercial insurance. Compared with commercially insured patients, mortality did not differ for patients with Medicaid (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.75-1.34], P=0.99) or Medicare (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.84-1.41], P=0.52). Medicaid was associated with a significantly lower adjusted incidence rate (incidence rate ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.78-0.99], P=0.041), and Medicare was associated with a significantly higher adjusted incidence rate (incidence rate ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.03-1.30], P=0.011) of adverse event episodes compared with commercially insured patients.
CONCLUSIONS: All-cause mortality after durable LVAD implantation did not differ significantly by payer type. Payer type was associated with the rate of adverse events, with Medicaid associated with a significantly lower rate, and Medicare with a significantly higher rate of adverse event episodes compared with commercially insured patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicaid; Medicare; health insurance; heart failure; heart-assist devices; quality of health care

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33993721      PMCID: PMC8153026          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.008277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  24 in total

1.  Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure.

Authors:  E A Rose; A C Gelijns; A J Moskowitz; D F Heitjan; L W Stevenson; W Dembitsky; J W Long; D D Ascheim; A R Tierney; R G Levitan; J T Watson; P Meier; N S Ronan; P A Shapiro; R M Lazar; L W Miller; L Gupta; O H Frazier; P Desvigne-Nickens; M C Oz; V L Poirier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America.

Authors:  Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Monica M Colvin; Mark H Drazner; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Gregg C Fonarow; Michael M Givertz; Steven M Hollenberg; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; Pamela N Peterson; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Cheryl Westlake
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Trends and Cost of Heart Transplantation and Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Impact of Proposed Federal Cuts.

Authors:  Nirav Patel; Rajat Kalra; Rajkumar Doshi; Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Garima Arora; Pankaj Arora
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 12.035

Review 4.  Socioeconomic disparities in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Priya Vart; Ron T Gansevoort; Michel M Joosten; Ute Bültmann; Sijmen A Reijneveld
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database annual report: Evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships.

Authors:  Robert L Kormos; Jennifer Cowger; Francis D Pagani; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Daniel J Goldstein; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Robert S Higgins; Lynne W Stevenson; Josef Stehlik; Pavan Atluri; Kathleen L Grady; James K Kirklin
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Impact of insurance status on heart transplant wait-list mortality for patients with left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Sitaramesh Emani; Dmitry Tumin; Randi E Foraker; Don Hayes; Sakima A Smith
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Primary payer status affects outcomes for cardiac valve operations.

Authors:  Damien J Lapar; Castigliano M Bhamidipati; Dustin M Walters; George J Stukenborg; Christine L Lau; Irving L Kron; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Does payer status impact clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery? A propensity analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Polanco; Andrew M Breglio; Shinobu Itagaki; Andrew B Goldstone; Joanna Chikwe
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.676

9.  Differences in the incidence of congestive heart failure by ethnicity: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Hossein Bahrami; Richard Kronmal; David A Bluemke; Jean Olson; Steven Shea; Kiang Liu; Gregory L Burke; João A C Lima
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-27

10.  Does Race Influence Decision Making for Advanced Heart Failure Therapies?

Authors:  Khadijah Breathett; Erika Yee; Natalie Pool; Megan Hebdon; Janice D Crist; Shannon Knapp; Ashley Larsen; Sade Solola; Luis Luy; Kathryn Herrera-Theut; Leanne Zabala; Jeff Stone; Marylyn M McEwen; Elizabeth Calhoun; Nancy K Sweitzer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.