Literature DB >> 23092662

Does payer status impact clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery? A propensity analysis.

Antonio Polanco1, Andrew M Breglio, Shinobu Itagaki, Andrew B Goldstone, Joanna Chikwe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medicaid patients bear proportionately greater financial responsibility for the cost of outpatient care and medication than non-Medicaid patients. We hypothesized that this difference in provision of continuing care would be associated with adverse clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective cohort analysis, 5056 consecutive adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery at a single institution between 2005 and 2010 were divided according to payer status. Propensity scores were calculated using 16 preoperative and demographic variables for each patient, and 461 1:1 propensity score-matched pairs were analyzed. Patient socioeconomic position was determined using aggregate data derived from zip codes. The main outcome measures were early mortality, postoperative complications, and patient survival.
RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, Medicaid was found to be an independent predictor of worse survival after cardiac surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.7; P = .01). No significant difference was observed in operative mortality in the 2 groups. After propensity score matching and controlling for socioeconomic position, the only independent predictors of worse midterm survival were an ejection fraction = 30% (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7; P = .02) and a higher logistic EuroSCORE (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1; P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity and lower socioeconomic status appear to be more important predictors of late mortality after cardiac surgery than payer status, which does not have a significant impact on survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23092662     DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.20111163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Surg Forum        ISSN: 1098-3511            Impact factor:   0.676


  6 in total

1.  Managing acute cholecystitis among Medicaid insured in New York State: opportunities to optimize care.

Authors:  Anne M Stey; Alexander J Greenstein; Arthur Aufses; Alan J Moskowitz; Natalia N Egorova
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Medicaid beneficiaries undergoing complex surgery at quality care centers: insights into the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Erin C Hall; Chaoyi Zheng; Russell C Langan; Lynt B Johnson; Nawar Shara; Waddah B Al-Refaie
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Cardiac Surgery Volume and Outcomes.

Authors:  Eric J Charles; Lily E Johnston; Morley A Herbert; J Hunter Mehaffey; Kenan W Yount; Donald S Likosky; Patricia F Theurer; Clifford E Fonner; Jeffrey B Rich; Alan M Speir; Gorav Ailawadi; Richard L Prager; Irving L Kron
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  The Disparities of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery Outcomes by Insurance Status: A Retrospective Cohort Study, 2007-2014.

Authors:  Timothy M Connolly; Robert S White; Dahniel L Sastow; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Zachary A Turnbull; Lisa Q Rong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Does Medicaid payer status affect patient's shoulder outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  V J Sabesan; D J L Lima; L Goss; M Gauger; J D Whaley; C Ghisa; D L Malone
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-11-11

6.  Association of Health Insurance Payer Type and Outcomes After Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: An Analysis of the STS-INTERMACS Registry.

Authors:  Sameed Ahmed M Khatana; Thomas C Hanff; Ashwin S Nathan; Elias J Dayoub; E Wilson Grandin; J Eduardo Rame; Alexander C Fanaroff; Jay Giri; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 8.790

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.