K O Bandaranayaka1,2, S A M Kularatne3, R P V J Rajapakse4, U B Abeysundara5, R M M A Rajapaksha5, R S Rajakaruna6,7. 1. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. 2. Postgraduate Institute of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. 3. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. 4. Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. 5. General Hospital, Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka. 6. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. rupikar@pdn.ac.lk. 7. Postgraduate Institute of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. rupikar@pdn.ac.lk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Otoacariasis is a parasitic otopathy reported in many parts of the world. This study presents the seasonal pattern, risk factors, and case notes on human otoacariasis in two climatically different districts: Anuradhapura and Kandy in the Dry and Wet/Intermediate zone of Sri Lanka, respectively. METHODS: Ticks removed from the ear canal of patients were collected. Risk factors of otoacarisis were determined by a case/control follow-up study. RESULTS: Nymphal Dermacentor auratus (90.8%) was the main tick species associated otoacariasis. In the Kandy District, infestation was year-round, while in the Anuradhapura District, it was seasonal with a peak in December-February. Children < 10 years were a risk group in both districts. Females were a risk group in the Kandy District. Engagement in outdoor activities was a risk factor in both districts. In addition, the presence of wildlife and domesticated animals were risk factors in the Kandy and Anuradhapura districts, respectively. The treatment protocols in the two hospitals were different. An infant with otoacariasis from the Anuradhapura District developed rickettsia. CONCLUSIONS: Although the tick species was the same, seasonality, risk groups, and risk factors in the two districts were different which could be due to the establishment and persistence of tick populations influenced by biotic and abiotic factors.
PURPOSE: Otoacariasis is a parasitic otopathy reported in many parts of the world. This study presents the seasonal pattern, risk factors, and case notes on human otoacariasis in two climatically different districts: Anuradhapura and Kandy in the Dry and Wet/Intermediate zone of Sri Lanka, respectively. METHODS: Ticks removed from the ear canal of patients were collected. Risk factors of otoacarisis were determined by a case/control follow-up study. RESULTS: Nymphal Dermacentor auratus (90.8%) was the main tick species associated otoacariasis. In the Kandy District, infestation was year-round, while in the Anuradhapura District, it was seasonal with a peak in December-February. Children < 10 years were a risk group in both districts. Females were a risk group in the Kandy District. Engagement in outdoor activities was a risk factor in both districts. In addition, the presence of wildlife and domesticated animals were risk factors in the Kandy and Anuradhapura districts, respectively. The treatment protocols in the two hospitals were different. An infant with otoacariasis from the Anuradhapura District developed rickettsia. CONCLUSIONS: Although the tick species was the same, seasonality, risk groups, and risk factors in the two districts were different which could be due to the establishment and persistence of tick populations influenced by biotic and abiotic factors.