Literature DB >> 33991721

Universal Engraftment after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Cryopreserved CD34-Selected Grafts.

Reuben P Jacob1, Jessica Flynn2, Sean M Devlin2, Molly Maloy3, Sergio A Giralt4, Peter Maslak5, Richard J O'Reilly6, Jo-Ann Tonon7, Miguel Angel Perales4, Scott T Avecilla7, Christina Cho4.   

Abstract

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, most centers performing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) have switched to the use of cryopreserved grafts. Previous investigators have suggested that cryopreserved allografts may heighten risk of nonengraftment. To date, no study has investigated the effect of cryopreservation of CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cells (CD34+ HPCs) used as the sole graft source. In this study, we sought to evaluate outcomes after unrelated donor or matched sibling allo-HCT with cryopreserved CD34+ HPCs. This was a single-center analysis of adult patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent allo-HCT with cryopreserved CD34-selected allo-HCT grafts between January 2010 and June 2017. All patients received ablative conditioning and antirejection prophylaxis with rabbit antithymocyte globulin. G-CSF-mobilized leukapheresis products underwent CD34 selection using the CliniMACS Reagent System. Cells were then cryopreserved in DMSO (final concentration 7.5%) to -90 °C using a controlled-rate freezing system before being transferred to vapor-phase liquid nitrogen storage. In internal validation, this method has shown 92% mean CD34+ cell viability and 99.7% mean CD34+ cell recovery. Engraftment was defined as the first of 3 consecutive days of an absolute neutrophil count of ≥0.5. Platelet recovery was recorded as the first of 7 consecutive days with a platelet count ≥20 K/μL without transfusion. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), and cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate rates of relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). A total of 64 patients received a cryopreserved CD34-selected graft. The median CD34+ cell count before cryopreservation was 6.6 × 106/kg (range, 1.4 to 16.1 × 106/kg), and the median CD3+ cell count was 2.0 × 103/kg (range, 0 to 21.1 × 106/kg). All patients were engrafted, at a median of 11 days post-HCT (range, 8 to 14 days). One patient had poor graft function in the setting of cytomegalovirus viremia, necessitating a CD34-selected boost on day +57. The median time to platelet recovery was 16 days (range, 13 to 99 days). The estimated 2-year OS was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58% to 83%) with cryopreserved grafts versus 62% (95% CI, 57% to 67%) with fresh grafts (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.35; P = .5). The estimated 2-year RFS in the 2 groups was 59% (95% CI, 48% to 74%) versus 56% (95% CI, 51% to 61%; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.51; P > .9). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 29% (95% CI, 17% to 41%) versus 23% (95% CI, 19% to 27%; P = .16), and the cumulative incidence of NRM at 2 years was 17% (95% CI, 9% to 28%) versus 23% (95% CI, 19% to 28%; P = .24). The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD by day +100 was 16% with cryopreserved grafts (95% CI, 8% to 26%) and 16% (95% CI, 13% to 20%; P = .97) with fresh grafts. Moderate to severe chronic GVHD by day +365 occurred in only 1 recipient of a cryopreserved graft (2%). Our data show that in patients with hematologic malignancies who received cryopreserved allogeneic CD34+ HPCs, engraftment, GVHD, and survival outcomes were consistent with those seen in recipients of fresh allogeneic CD34+ HPC grafts at our center. Our laboratory validation and clinical experience demonstrate the safety of our cryopreservation procedure for CD34-selected allografts.
Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; CD34 selection; COVID-19; Cryopreservation; Engraftment

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33991721      PMCID: PMC8316317          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther        ISSN: 2666-6367


  17 in total

1.  Similar outcomes of cryopreserved allogeneic peripheral stem cell transplants (PBSCT) compared to fresh allografts.

Authors:  Dong Hwan Kim; Nazir Jamal; Ronnie Saragosa; David Loach; Janice Wright; Vikas Gupta; John Kuruvilla; Jeffrey H Lipton; Mark Minden; Hans A Messner
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Transportation and cryopreservation may impair haematopoietic stem cell function and engraftment of allogeneic PBSCs, but not BM.

Authors:  M Lioznov; C Dellbrügger; A Sputtek; B Fehse; N Kröger; A R Zander
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering.

Authors:  D R Sutherland; L Anderson; M Keeney; R Nayar; I Chin-Yee
Journal:  J Hematother       Date:  1996-06

4.  Co-Infections by Double-Stranded DNA Viruses after Ex Vivo T Cell-Depleted, CD34+ Selected Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Yao-Ting Huang; Seong Jin Kim; Yeon Joo Lee; Daniel Burack; Paige Nichols; Molly Maloy; Miguel-Angel Perales; Sergio A Giralt; Ann A Jakubowski; Genovefa A Papanicolaou
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Has allogeneic stem cell cryopreservation been given the 'cold shoulder'? An analysis of the pros and cons of using frozen versus fresh stem cell products in allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  N V Frey; H M Lazarus; S C Goldstein
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Analysis of the recovery of cryopreserved and thawed CD34+ and CD3+ cells collected for hematopoietic transplantation.

Authors:  Virginia Fisher; Hanh Khuu; Virginia David-Ocampo; Karen Byrne; Steven Pavletic; Michael Bishop; Daniel H Fowler; A John Barrett; David F Stroncek
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  T-cell-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation as postremission therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia: freedom from relapse in the absence of graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  E B Papadopoulos; M H Carabasi; H Castro-Malaspina; B H Childs; S Mackinnon; F Boulad; A P Gillio; N A Kernan; T N Small; P Szabolcs; J Taylor; J Yahalom; N H Collins; S A Bleau; P M Black; G Heller; R J O'Reilly; J W Young
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  T cell depleted stem-cell transplantation for adults with hematologic malignancies: sustained engraftment of HLA-matched related donor grafts without the use of antithymocyte globulin.

Authors:  Ann A Jakubowski; Trudy N Small; James W Young; Nancy A Kernan; Hugo Castro-Malaspina; Katherine C Hsu; Miguel-Angel Perales; Nancy Collins; Christine Cisek; Michelle Chiu; Marcel R M van den Brink; Richard J O'Reilly; Esperanza B Papadopoulos
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Variable CD34+ recovery of cryopreserved allogeneic HPC products: transplant implications during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Duncan Purtill; Vicki Antonenas; Paul Chiappini; Daochen Tong; Elizabeth O'Flaherty; Ashish Bajel; Karieshma Kabani; Stephen Larsen; Suikeat Tan; Cheryl Hutchins; David J Curtis; Glen A Kennedy; Anne-Marie Watson; LiJun Bai; Matthew Greenwood; David J Gottlieb; Nada Hamad
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-09-08

10.  Graft Cryopreservation Does Not Impact Overall Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Mehdi Hamadani; Mei-Jie Zhang; Xiao-Ying Tang; Mingwei Fei; Claudio Brunstein; Saurabh Chhabra; Anita D'Souza; Filippo Milano; Rachel Phelan; Wael Saber; Bronwen E Shaw; Daniel Weisdorf; Steven M Devine; Mary M Horowitz
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Secondary Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 19 Pandemic on Patients and the Cellular Therapy Healthcare Ecosystem.

Authors:  Jane Koo; Jeffrey J Auletta; David M Hartley; John Huber; Samantha Jaglowski; Malika Kapadia; Katilyn Kusnier; Leslie Lehmann; Joseph Maakaron; Kasiani C Myers; Ahna Pai; Loretta Parker; Rachel Phelan; Christine Sper; Seth J Rotz; Christopher E Dandoy
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2022-07-25

2.  Impact of Cryopreservation of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) in Transplantation from Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD).

Authors:  Gabriele Facchin; Chiara Savignano; Marta Lisa Battista; Miriam Isola; Maria De Martino; Giuseppe Petruzzellis; Chiara Rosignoli; Umberto Pizzano; Michela Cerno; Giulia De Cecco; Antonella Bertone; Giovanni Barillari; Renato Fanin; Francesca Patriarca
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.