Literature DB >> 3399068

Hemispatial neglect affected by non-neglected stimuli.

V W Mark1, C A Kooistra, K M Heilman.   

Abstract

Patients with hemispatial neglect fail to cancel lines distributed on one side of a piece of paper. This defect is thought to be induced by a deficit in the neuronal systems that mediate attention, intention, and exploration toward and in the hemispace contralateral to the lesion. However, an alternate (but not mutually exclusive) interpretation is that the patients are either strongly attracted to or impaired in disengaging from the stimuli occupying the other, non-neglected hemispace. We tested ten patients with neglect on two versions of a cancellation test. In the control test they cancelled lines by drawing over them, and in the experimental test they erased lines. There were significantly more omissions in the drawing-over task than in the erasing task. The improved performance when lines were cancelled by removal instead of by marking them suggests that hemispatial neglect is influenced by the presence of stimuli in the non-neglected hemispace.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3399068     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.38.8.1207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  35 in total

1.  Line versus representational bisections in unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  S Ishiai; Y Koyama; K Seki; M Izawa
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Disappearance of unilateral spatial neglect following a simple instruction.

Authors:  S Ishiai; K Seki; Y Koyama; Y Izumi
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Disorganized search on cancellation is not a consequence of neglect.

Authors:  V W Mark; A J Woods; K K Ball; D L Roth; M Mennemeier
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.

Authors:  Mark Mennemeier; Christopher A Pierce; Anjan Chatterjee; Britt Anderson; George Jewell; Rachael Dowler; Adam J Woods; Tannahill Glenn; Victor W Mark
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Spontaneous eye and head position in patients with spatial neglect.

Authors:  Monika Fruhmann-Berger; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Modeling orienting behavior and its disorders with "ecological" neural networks.

Authors:  Andrea Di Ferdinando; Domenico Parisi; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Rehabilitating mental representations: a genuinely "blind" study.

Authors:  John C Adair; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect.

Authors:  R Tegnér; M Levander
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Cognitive correlates of metamemory in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Danielle Shaked; Meagan Farrell; Edward Huey; Janet Metcalfe; Sarah Cines; Jason Karlawish; Elizabeth Sullo; Stephanie Cosentino
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  Spatial neglect: clinical and neuroscience review: a wealth of information on the poverty of spatial attention.

Authors:  John C Adair; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.