Literature DB >> 33989535

Ethnicity-specific BMI cutoffs for obesity based on type 2 diabetes risk in England: a population-based cohort study.

Rishi Caleyachetty1, Thomas M Barber2, Nuredin Ibrahim Mohammed3, Francesco P Cappuccio4, Rebecca Hardy5, Rohini Mathur6, Amitava Banerjee7, Paramjit Gill4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National and global recommendations for BMI cutoffs to trigger action to prevent obesity-related complications like type 2 diabetes among non-White populations are questionable. We aimed to prospectively identify ethnicity-specific BMI cutoffs for obesity based on the risk of type 2 diabetes that are risk-equivalent to the BMI cutoff for obesity among White populations (≥30 kg/m2).
METHODS: In this population-based cohort study, we used electronic health records across primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) linked to secondary care records (Hospital Episodes Statistics) from a network of general practitioner practices in England. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, without any past or current diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, had a BMI of 15·0-50·0 kg/m2 and complete ethnicity data, were registered with a general practitioner practice in England at any point between Sept 1, 1990, and Dec 1, 2018, and had at least 1 year of follow-up data. Patients with type 2 diabetes were identified by use of a CALIBER phenotyping algorithm. Self-reported ethnicity was collapsed into five main categories. Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted negative binomial regression models, with fractional polynomials for BMI, were fitted with incident type 2 diabetes and ethnicity data.
FINDINGS: 1 472 819 people were included in our study, of whom 1 333 816 (90·6%) were White, 75 956 (5·2%) were south Asian, 49 349 (3·4%) were Black, 10 934 (0·7%) were Chinese, and 2764 (0·2%) were Arab. After a median follow-up of 6·5 years (IQR 3·2-11·2), 97 823 (6·6%) of 1 472 819 individuals were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. For the equivalent age-adjusted and sex-adjusted incidence of type 2 diabetes at a BMI of 30·0 kg/m2 in White populations, the BMI cutoffs were 23·9 kg/m2 (95% CI 23·6-24·0) in south Asian populations, 28·1 kg/m2 (28·0-28·4) in Black populations, 26·9 kg/m2 (26·7-27·2) in Chinese populations, and 26·6 kg/m2 (26·5-27·0) in Arab populations.
INTERPRETATION: Revisions of ethnicity-specific BMI cutoffs are needed to ensure that minority ethnic populations are provided with appropriate clinical surveillance to optimise the prevention, early diagnosis, and timely management of type 2 diabetes. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33989535     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00088-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol        ISSN: 2213-8587            Impact factor:   32.069


  36 in total

Review 1.  Adolescent Immigration and Type-2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Ma'ayan Omer Gilon; Yulia Balmakov; Shira Gelman; Gilad Twig
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Interpretation of ethnicity-specific data: increased risk versus increased utilisation.

Authors:  Alizah Ali; Fariha Hameed; Bharath Nagaraj; Aayush Visaria
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Racial differences in all-cause mortality and future complications among people with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from more than 2.4 million individuals.

Authors:  Yasmin Ezzatvar; Robinson Ramírez-Vélez; Mikel Izquierdo; Antonio García-Hermoso
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Effect of Isomaltulose on Glycemic and Insulinemic Responses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jinchi Xie; Jingkuo Li; Qi Qin; Hua Ning; Zhiping Long; Yu Gao; Yue Yu; Zhen Han; Fan Wang; Maoqing Wang
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 11.567

5.  Disparities in diabetes between US-born and foreign-born population: using three diabetes indicators.

Authors:  Daesung Choi; K M Venkat Narayan; Shivani A Patel
Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol       Date:  2022-01-04

6.  Evaluating future risk of NAFLD in adolescents: a prediction and decision curve analysis.

Authors:  Kushala W M Abeysekera; James G Orr; Fiona H Gordon; Laura D Howe; Julian Hamilton-Shield; Jon Heron; Matthew Hickman
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 2.847

7.  Healthcare Service Interventions to Improve the Healthcare Outcomes of Hospitalised Patients with Extreme Obesity: Protocol for an Evidence and Gap Map.

Authors:  Caz Hales; Rebecca Chrystall; Anne M Haase; Mona Jeffreys
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2022-06-08

Review 8.  Dietary Assessment Tools and Metabolic Syndrome: Is It Time to Change the Focus?

Authors:  Helen Chauhan; Regina Belski; Eleanor Bryant; Matthew Cooke
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 6.706

9.  Optimal cut-offs of five anthropometric indices and their predictive ability of type 2 diabetes in a nationally representative Kenyan study.

Authors:  Anthony Muchai Manyara
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2021-07-09

10.  Performance of Body Mass Index in Identifying Obesity Defined by Body Fat Percentage and Hypertension Among Malaysian Population: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Azimatun Noor Aizuddin; Chee Mun Chan; A Rahman Anwar; Yee Xien Ong; Kok-Yong Chin
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.