Xiangyang Wu1, Yong Wu2, Ruijuan Zheng1, Fen Tang1, Lianhua Qin1, Detian Lai1, Lu Zhang3, Lingming Chen4, Bo Yan5, Hua Yang1, Yang Wang1, Feifei Li2, Jinyu Zhang3, Fei Wang1, Lin Wang1, Yajuan Cao1, Mingtong Ma1, Zhonghua Liu1, Jianxia Chen1, Xiaochen Huang1, Jie Wang1, Ruiliang Jin1, Peng Wang6, Qin Sun6, Wei Sha6, Liangdong Lyu7, Pedro Moura-Alves8,9, Anca Dorhoi8,10, Gang Pei8, Peng Zhang11, Jiayu Chen12, Shaorong Gao12, Felix Randow13, Gucheng Zeng4, Chang Chen11, Xin-Shan Ye2, Stefan H E Kaufmann8,14,15, Haipeng Liu1,8,16,17, Baoxue Ge1,16. 1. Shanghai Key Lab of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China. 3. State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Institute of Genetics, School of Life Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 4. Department of Microbiology, Key Laboratory for Tropical Diseases Control of the Ministry of Education, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 5. Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 6. Department of TB, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 7. Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology of the Ministry of Education/Ministry of Health, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 8. Department of Immunology, Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany. 9. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 10. Institute of Immunology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany. 11. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 12. Clinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China. 13. Division of Protein and Nucleic Acid Chemistry, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK. 14. Hagler Institute for Advanced Study at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. 15. Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany. 16. Clinical and Translational Research Center, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 17. Central Laboratory, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
Mycobacterial arabinogalactan (AG) is an essential cell wall component of mycobacteria and a frequent structural and bio-synthetical target for anti-tuberculosis (TB) drug development. Here, we report that mycobacterial AG is recognized by galectin-9 and exacerbates mycobacterial infection. Administration of AG-specific aptamers inhibits cellular infiltration caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) or Mycobacterium bovis BCG, and moderately increases survival of Mtb-infected mice or Mycobacterium marinum-infected zebrafish. AG interacts with carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) 2 of galectin-9 with high affinity, and galectin-9 associates with transforming growth factor β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) via CRD2 to trigger subsequent activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) as well as induction of the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Moreover, deletion of galectin-9 or inhibition of MMPs blocks AG-induced pathological impairments in the lung, and the AG-galectin-9 axis aggravates the process of Mtb infection in mice. These results demonstrate that AG is an important virulence factor of mycobacteria and galectin-9 is a novel receptor for Mtb and other mycobacteria, paving the way for the development of novel effective TB immune modulators.
Mycobacterial arabinogalactan (AG) is an essential cell wall component of mycobacteria and a frequent structural and bio-synthetical target for anti-tuberculosis (TB) drug development. Here, we report that mycobacterial AG is recognized by galectin-9 and exacerbates mycobacterial infection. Administration of AG-specific aptamers inhibits cellular infiltration caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) or Mycobacterium bovis BCG, and moderately increases survival of Mtb-infected mice or Mycobacterium marinum-infected zebrafish. AG interacts with carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) 2 of galectin-9 with high affinity, and galectin-9 associates with transforming growth factor β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) via CRD2 to trigger subsequent activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) as well as induction of the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Moreover, deletion of galectin-9 or inhibition of MMPs blocks AG-induced pathological impairments in the lung, and the AG-galectin-9 axis aggravates the process of Mtb infection in mice. These results demonstrate that AG is an important virulence factor of mycobacteria and galectin-9 is a novel receptor for Mtb and other mycobacteria, paving the way for the development of novel effective TB immune modulators.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection leads to active tuberculosis (TB) in millions of people annually (Kaufmann et al,
2018). In 2019, 10 million new TB cases and 1.4 million deaths were reported (WHO Global Tuberculosis Report, 2020). An estimated quarter of the world's population is infected with Mtb, but only 5–10% of infected individuals succumb to active TB disease (WHO Global Tuberculosis Report, 2020). The pathogenesis of TB is shaped by an intricate balance between host immunity and Mtb infection (Orme et al,
2015). Innate immune cells respond to Mtb infection to trigger a cascade of cellular events including phagocytosis, apoptosis, autophagy, inflammasome activation, and nitric oxide production to curb the intracellular survival of Mtb. Moreover, dendritic cells (DCs) migrate from the site of infection to the regional lymph node, where they prime naïve T cells to mount an Mtb‐specific acquired immune response including enduring memory which restricts bacterial growth (Ernst, 2012; O'Garra et al,
2013; Robinson et al,
2015). On the other hand, Mtb has developed numerous strategies to evade or inhibit host innate immunity (Hmama et al,
2015; Liu et al,
2017a; Chai et al,
2020).Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) of innate immune cells sense Mtb‐derived conserved pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) which trigger a cascade of innate immune responses (Mortaz et al,
2015; Stamm et al,
2015). Surface receptors such as Toll‐like receptor (TLRs), C‐type lectin receptors (CLRs), and scavenger receptors (SRs) (Stamm et al,
2015) sense cell wall‐associated glycolipids or glycoproteins and secreted proteins to initiate phagocytosis, apoptosis, or production of immune‐regulatory cytokines (Wang et al,
2017; Wang et al,
2019). Endosomal PRRs including TLR9 and TLR3 sense Mtb‐derived DNA and RNA, respectively, to induce the production of cytokines such as interleukin (IL)‐10 (Ito et al,
2009; Bai et al,
2014). Cytosolic receptors such as absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) and NOD‐, LRR‐, and pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) sense cytosolic DNA or Early secretory antigenic target‐6 (ESAT‐6) to activate the inflammasome for processing of IL‐1β (Mishra et al,
2010; Saiga et al,
2012). Activation of cytosolic nucleotide‐binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2) by muramyl dipeptide (MDP) induces the production of antimicrobial peptide LL37 and autophagy (Juarez et al,
2012). Mtb‐derived extracellular DNA (eDNA) and cyclic dinucleotide c‐di‐AMP are sensed by cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic GMP‐AMP synthase (cGAS) and adaptor stimulator of interferon genes (STING), respectively (Dey et al,
2015; Watson et al,
2015; Dey et al,
2017) to induce production of type I interferons. Moreover, Mtb escapes into the cytosol (van der Wel et al,
2007), where ubiquitin‐coated Mtb was recognized by autophagy receptors such as p62 and NDP52 to induce xenophagy (Perrin et al,
2004). On the other hand, several Mtb‐secreted proteins such as ESAT‐6 and PtpA interact with PRRs to suppress host immunity (Pathak et al,
2007; Wang et al,
2015). Collectively, the identification of novel receptors involved in dynamic sensing of Mtb‐derived components during infection is critical for understanding host–pathogen interactions and pathogenesis of TB.The Mtb cell wall comprises various components that interact with host immune molecules to regulate the pathogenesis of Mtb infection. Mannosylated lipoarabinomannan (ManLAM), a major glycan of Mtb, is recognized by dendritic cell (DC)‐associated C‐type lectin‐2 (Dectin‐2, also known as CLEC6A) which induces the production of both pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory cytokines in DCs (Yonekawa et al,
2014). Mycobacterial cell wall glycolipid trehalose‐6,6´ dimycolate (TDM or cord factor) is sensed by Dectin‐3 which induces expression of the Mincle gene. The interaction of Mincle with TDM further activates the NF‐κB signaling pathway to produce pro‐inflammatory cytokines (Ishikawa et al,
2009; Werninghaus et al,
2009; Zhao et al,
2014). Arabinogalactan (AG), together with peptidoglycan and mycolic acid, forms the cell wall core of Mtb (Jankute et al,
2015; Grzegorzewicz et al,
2016). Remarkably, the arabinosyltransferases EmbA, EmbB, and EmbC, which are critical for AG synthesis, serve as targets for anti‐TB drug action (Escuyer et al,
2001; Goude et al,
2009; Cui et al,
2014; Zhang et al,
2020a; Zhang et al,
2020b). Recently, the structures of arabinosyltransferases targeted by the anti‐TB drug ethambutol have been elucidated (Zhang et al,
2020a; Zhang et al,
2020b). However, it remains unclear whether mycobacterial AG qualifies as a PAMP or a virulence factor of Mtb and its PRR remains unidentified due to the lack of purified mycobacterial AG and the unavailability of an AG‐deficient mycobacteria (Toyonaga et al,
2016).Based on our report of the first complete synthesis of an AG composed of 92 mono‐saccharide units (Wu et al,
2017), we harnessed chemically synthesized AG for the evaluation of its biological functions. By knockdown of genes involved in AG synthesis and generation of AG‐specific aptamers, we demonstrate that AG is a virulence factor of Mtb and aggravates mycobacterial infection. Moreover, galectin‐9, a member of the β‐galactoside binding gene family, was identified as a receptor for AG which signals through the TAK1‐ERK‐MMP axis to trigger pathological impairments in the lung. Our findings form the basis for novel intervention strategies against TB which target this axis.
Results
AG exacerbates mycobacterial infection
Given the lung is a main port of entry for Mtb and the primary organ of pulmonary TB (Kaufmann et al,
2014), we interrogated whether AG affects the lung by employing the chemically synthesized AG composed of 92 mono‐saccharide units (Wu et al,
2017). In an experimental mouse model, intraperitoneal administration of AG caused profound cellular infiltrations in the lung as demonstrated by H&E staining in a dose‐dependent manner (Fig 1A and B). Similarly, intravenous injection of AG caused pathological impairments of pulmonary tissue (Appendix Fig S1A–C). Lung tissue damage was further exacerbated when AG was emulsified in Freund's incomplete adjuvant (FIA) (Bekierkunst, 1968; Bekierkunst et al,
1969; Yarkoni & Rapp, 1977; Lee et al,
2012) (Appendix Fig S1A–C).
Figure 1
AG is a virulence factor of mycobacteria
C57BL/6 mice were left untreated (NT) or were intraperitoneally treated with indicated amounts of AG for 3 days. Lung sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin(H&E) (A) and quantification of lung lesion burden from H&E‐stained sections (B).
Sequence and secondary structure of identified aptamers against AG as predicted with DNAMAN version 6.0.
H&E staining of lung sections from mice 4 weeks after intranasal infection with M. bovis BCG (D and E) or Mtb H37Rv (F and G) in the absence or presence of intranasally administrated AG aptamers (1 μg) once at a 1‐week interval. Quantification of lung inflamed regions shown in (E and G).
Data information: Data in (B, E, G) are means ± SD of indicated numbers of mice from 1 of n = 3 independent experiments with similar results and each symbol represents 1 mouse. Data in (A, D, F) are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. One‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test (B and E) and Student’s t‐test (G) were used for statistical analysis, respectively. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. Scale bar, 200 μm.
AG is a virulence factor of mycobacteria
C57BL/6 mice were left untreated (NT) or were intraperitoneally treated with indicated amounts of AG for 3 days. Lung sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin(H&E) (A) and quantification of lung lesion burden from H&E‐stained sections (B).Sequence and secondary structure of identified aptamers against AG as predicted with DNAMAN version 6.0.H&E staining of lung sections from mice 4 weeks after intranasal infection with M. bovis BCG (D and E) or Mtb H37Rv (F and G) in the absence or presence of intranasally administrated AG aptamers (1 μg) once at a 1‐week interval. Quantification of lung inflamed regions shown in (E and G).Data information: Data in (B, E, G) are means ± SD of indicated numbers of mice from 1 of n = 3 independent experiments with similar results and each symbol represents 1 mouse. Data in (A, D, F) are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. One‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test (B and E) and Student’s t‐test (G) were used for statistical analysis, respectively. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. Scale bar, 200 μm.To further verify the function of AG, we performed an in vitro selection process called Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment (SELEX) of aptamers (Tuerk & Gold, 1990; Bock et al,
1992) against AG (Appendix Fig S2A), which has been successfully applied for the screening of aptamers targeting Mtb previously (Qin et al,
2014; Aimaiti et al,
2015; Sun et al,
2016; Tang et al,
2016; Zhang et al,
2017; Golichenari et al,
2018). Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was employed to determine respective affinities of aptamers against AG. We systematically monitored the selection process to obtain additional aptamers against AG, thereby improving the dynamic evolution of aptamers against AG. After nine rounds of selection, the maximum level of affinity was enriched and three aptamers (AA618, AA835, AA932) with high affinity but different structures were selected (Fig 1C). Among them, the frequency of aptamer AA932 sequence was highest, which was deemed as the preponderant aptamer. In an intranasal mycobacterial infection animal model (Zheng et al,
2018b; Wang et al,
2019), AG‐specific aptamers markedly inhibited the pathological impairments in the lung caused by infection with either Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) (Fig 1D and E) or Mtb H37Rv (Fig 1F and G). Moreover, intranasal administration of AG‐specific aptamers moderately enhanced the survival rate of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice infected with a lethal dose of Mtb H37Rv (Appendix Fig S2B). Consistently, in a zebrafish larvae infection model (Takaki et al,
2013), preincubation of AG‐specific aptamers significantly increased the survival rate of zebrafish larvae infected with Mycobacterium marinum (Appendix Fig S2C), while the AG‐specific aptamers alone did not show any effect on the survival of zebrafish larvae (Appendix Fig S2C). Taken together, these results point to AG as an important virulence factor of Mtb and other mycobacteria.
AG induces the expression of MMPs
Macrophages serve as both habitat and the first line of defense against Mtb (Pieters, 2008). To examine the effect of AG on macrophages, we treated macrophages with AG and analyzed the induced gene expression patterns by RNA sequencing. The GO pathway analysis revealed an enrichment of multiple matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) (Figs 2A and EV1A–C). Considering the important role of MMPs in the pathogenesis of TB and the correlation of their levels with clinical and radiological markers of lung tissue destruction (Volkman et al,
2010; Ong et al,
2014; Parasa et al,
2017; Sabir et al,
2019; Kathamuthu et al,
2020), we therefore specifically focused on these genes in our study. Profound induction of MMPs including MMP9, MMP10, and MMP12 in response to AG stimulation was validated by quantitative RT–PCR in both murine and human macrophages (Figs 2B and EV1D–F). The secretion of MMPs including MMP9, MMP10, and MMP12 into the supernatants of mouse macrophages was further validated by Western blot (Fig 2C). Moreover, in lung tissues of mice treated with AG intraperitoneally, abundances of MMP transcripts were highly upregulated (Figs 2D and EV1G). Reciprocally, pretreatment of AG‐specific aptamers including AA932 and AA835 markedly reduced AG‐induced MMP gene expression in both murine and human macrophages (Figs 2E and EV1H). Consistently, treatment of AG aptamer AA932 abrogated AG‐stimulated secretion of MMPs in supernatants (Fig 2F). Finally, intranasal administration of AG‐specific aptamers profoundly decreased abundances of MMPs in pulmonary tissue of mice treated intraperitoneally with AG (Fig 2G). For in‐depth analysis of the function of AG in mycobacteria, we generated M. marinum mutants in which AG was diminished by CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated conditional knockdown of MMAR_5356 and MMAR_5357 (Appendix Fig S3A), that are homologs of embA and embB in Mtb, respectively, and are important for the biosynthesis of AG (Alderwick et al,
2015; Jankute et al,
2015; Dulberger et al,
2020; Zhang, et al,
2020a). Tetracycline (Tet) treatment led to significantly reduced expression of corresponding genes (Appendix Fig S3B), which subsequently diminished the expression level of MMPs in macrophages infected with M. marinum (Appendix Fig S3C). To further clarify whether these mutants regulate MMP expression by affecting mycobacterial growth, we measured the growth curves of the wild‐type and knockdown mutants of M. marinum. The data demonstrate that tetracycline treatment of wild‐type and MMAR_5356 and MMAR_5357 did not significantly affect the growth of M. marinum in 7H10 culture medium (Appendix Fig S3D–F). Moreover, treatment with AG‐specific aptamers markedly reduced the expression and secretion of MMPs in Mtb‐infected macrophages (Fig 2H and I). Consistent with these in vitro findings, intranasal administration of AG‐specific aptamers markedly reduced abundances of MMPs in the lung of mice infected with Mtb or BCG (Fig 2J, Appendix Fig S3G). Our data, therefore, identify AG as a mycobacterial MMP inducer in macrophages.
Figure 2
AG induces expression of MMPs
Heat map showing RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase per million of mapped reads) mean values of Mmps from mouse peritoneal macrophages (MPM) stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h or left untreated (NT).
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis of Mmps including Mmp2, Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 mRNA from mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times.
Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP2, MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times; GADPH of cell lysates served as a loading control.
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp2, Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from the lungs of mice at indicated days post‐intraperitoneal administration of AG (100 μg).
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h in the absence or presence of AG aptamers (0.5 μg/ml).
Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times in the absence or presence of AG aptamers (0.5 μg/ml); GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from the lungs of mice at 3 days post‐intraperitoneal administration of AG (100 μg) in the absence or presence of AG aptamers. AG aptamers (1 μg/mouse) were intranasally administrated per day.
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from mouse peritoneal macrophages infected with H37Rv for 24 h (MOI = 5) in the absence or presence of AG aptamers (1 μg/ml).
Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages infected with H37Rv for indicated times (MOI = 5) in the absence or presence of AG aptamers (0.5 μg/ml); GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from lungs of mice intranasally infected with H37Rv (2 × 106 cfu/mouse) for 4 weeks in the absence or presence of AG aptamers. AG aptamers (1 μg/mouse) were intranasally administrated once at a 1‐week interval.
Data information: Data in (B, E, H) are means ± SD averaged from 3 independent experiments performed with technical triplicates and each symbol represents the mean of technical triplicates. Data in (D, G, J) are means ± SD of indicated numbers of mice from 1 of at least n = 2 independent experiments, and each symbol represents data from 1 mouse. Data (D, G, J) shown are representative of n = 2 (D) or n = 3 (G, J) independent experiments. Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (B, D, E, G, H, J) was used for statistical analysis. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Figure EV1
AG induces expression of MMPs
Scatter plots of differentially expressed genes in the mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h as identified by RNA‐seq analysis. The RNA from the peritoneal macrophages was pooled and subjected to RNA‐seq.
GO class of gene expressions in mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h as identified by RNA‐seq analysis.
KEGG class of gene expressions in mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h as identified by RNA‐seq analysis.
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, and Mmp12 mRNA from THP‐1 cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times (D) or at indicated concentrations (μg/ml) for 48 h (E).
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 mRNA from mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG at indicated concentrations (μg/ml) for 24 h.
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from the lungs of mice at indicated concentrations (μg) for 3 days post‐intraperitoneal administration of AG.
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, and Mmp12 from THP‐1 cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 48 h left untreated or pretreated with AG aptamers AA932 or AA835 (0.5 μg/ml).
Data information: Data in (D–F, H) are means ± SD averaged from 3 independent experiments performed with technical triplicates, and each symbol represents the mean of technical triplicates. Data in (G) are means ± SD of indicated mice from 1 of n = 3 independent experiments, and each symbol represents data from 1 mouse. One‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis, respectively. ns, not significant; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.
AG induces expression of MMPs
Heat map showing RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase per million of mapped reads) mean values of Mmps from mouse peritoneal macrophages (MPM) stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h or left untreated (NT).Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis of Mmps including Mmp2, Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 mRNA from mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times.Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP2, MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times; GADPH of cell lysates served as a loading control.qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp2, Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from the lungs of mice at indicated days post‐intraperitoneal administration of AG (100 μg).qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h in the absence or presence of AG aptamers (0.5 μg/ml).Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times in the absence or presence of AG aptamers (0.5 μg/ml); GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from the lungs of mice at 3 days post‐intraperitoneal administration of AG (100 μg) in the absence or presence of AG aptamers. AG aptamers (1 μg/mouse) were intranasally administrated per day.qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from mouse peritoneal macrophages infected with H37Rv for 24 h (MOI = 5) in the absence or presence of AG aptamers (1 μg/ml).Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages infected with H37Rv for indicated times (MOI = 5) in the absence or presence of AG aptamers (0.5 μg/ml); GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from lungs of mice intranasally infected with H37Rv (2 × 106 cfu/mouse) for 4 weeks in the absence or presence of AG aptamers. AG aptamers (1 μg/mouse) were intranasally administrated once at a 1‐week interval.Data information: Data in (B, E, H) are means ± SD averaged from 3 independent experiments performed with technical triplicates and each symbol represents the mean of technical triplicates. Data in (D, G, J) are means ± SD of indicated numbers of mice from 1 of at least n = 2 independent experiments, and each symbol represents data from 1 mouse. Data (D, G, J) shown are representative of n = 2 (D) or n = 3 (G, J) independent experiments. Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (B, D, E, G, H, J) was used for statistical analysis. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.Source data are available online for this figure.Scatter plots of differentially expressed genes in the mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h as identified by RNA‐seq analysis. The RNA from the peritoneal macrophages was pooled and subjected to RNA‐seq.GO class of gene expressions in mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h as identified by RNA‐seq analysis.KEGG class of gene expressions in mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h as identified by RNA‐seq analysis.qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, and Mmp12 mRNA from THP‐1 cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times (D) or at indicated concentrations (μg/ml) for 48 h (E).qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 mRNA from mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG at indicated concentrations (μg/ml) for 24 h.qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from the lungs of mice at indicated concentrations (μg) for 3 days post‐intraperitoneal administration of AG.qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, and Mmp12 from THP‐1 cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 48 h left untreated or pretreated with AG aptamers AA932 or AA835 (0.5 μg/ml).Data information: Data in (D–F, H) are means ± SD averaged from 3 independent experiments performed with technical triplicates, and each symbol represents the mean of technical triplicates. Data in (G) are means ± SD of indicated mice from 1 of n = 3 independent experiments, and each symbol represents data from 1 mouse. One‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis, respectively. ns, not significant; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.
AG activates ERK to induce MMPs
We next investigated the signaling events involved in MMP induction by AG. Treatment with AG activated MAPKs including ERK, p38, and JNK, as well as NF‐κB in both human and murine macrophages (Fig 3A and B). Moreover, administration of AG‐specific aptamers impaired AG‐induced activation of MAPKs and NF‐κB signaling pathways (Fig 3B). To further define the downstream pathway involved in the AG‐induced expression of MMPs, macrophages were treated with AG in the presence of specific inhibitors targeting NF‐κB (PDTC), ERK (PD98059), JNK (SP600125), and p38 (SB203580), respectively. Specific inhibition of ERK by PD98059 significantly reduced AG‐induced expression of MMPs (Fig 3C–E). Consistently, PD98059‐mediated inhibition of ERK markedly reduced AG‐stimulated secretion of MMPs as well (Fig 3F). Moreover, the secretion of MMPs in mouse macrophages in response to Mtb infection was dramatically attenuated in the presence of ERK inhibitor (Fig 3G). We, therefore, conclude that AG activated the ERK signaling pathway to induce MMPs expression.
Figure 3
AG activates ERK to induce MMPs
Immunoblots of cell lysates were performed to analyze p‐ERK1/2, p‐JNK, p‐P38, and p‐P65 by THP‐1 cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times, and GADPH as a loading control.
Immunoblots of cell lysates were performed to analyze p‐ERK1/2, p‐JNK, p‐P38, and p‐P65 by mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times left untreated or pretreated with AG aptamer (1 μg/ml), and GADPH as a loading control.
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9 (C), Mmp10 (D), and Mmp12 (E) from THP‐1 cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h in the absence or presence of different inhibitors targeting NF‐κB (PDTC), ERK (PD98059), JNK (SP600125), and p38 (SB203580) at the concentration of 10 μM.
Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times in the absence or presence of inhibitor targeting ERK (PD98059) at the concentration of 10 μM; GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.
Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages infected with H37Rv for indicated times (MOI = 5) in the absence or presence of inhibitor targeting ERK (PD98059) at the concentration of 10 μM; GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.
Data information: Data in (A and B) are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. Data in (C–E) are means ± SD averaged from n = 3 independent experiments performed with technical triplicates, and each symbol represents the mean of technical triplicates. Two‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test (C–E) were used for statistical analysis. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; ****P < 0.0001.
Source data are available online for this figure.
AG activates ERK to induce MMPs
Immunoblots of cell lysates were performed to analyze p‐ERK1/2, p‐JNK, p‐P38, and p‐P65 by THP‐1 cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times, and GADPH as a loading control.Immunoblots of cell lysates were performed to analyze p‐ERK1/2, p‐JNK, p‐P38, and p‐P65 by mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times left untreated or pretreated with AG aptamer (1 μg/ml), and GADPH as a loading control.qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9 (C), Mmp10 (D), and Mmp12 (E) from THP‐1 cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h in the absence or presence of different inhibitors targeting NF‐κB (PDTC), ERK (PD98059), JNK (SP600125), and p38 (SB203580) at the concentration of 10 μM.Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times in the absence or presence of inhibitor targeting ERK (PD98059) at the concentration of 10 μM; GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages infected with H37Rv for indicated times (MOI = 5) in the absence or presence of inhibitor targeting ERK (PD98059) at the concentration of 10 μM; GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.Data information: Data in (A and B) are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. Data in (C–E) are means ± SD averaged from n = 3 independent experiments performed with technical triplicates, and each symbol represents the mean of technical triplicates. Two‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test (C–E) were used for statistical analysis. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; ****P < 0.0001.Source data are available online for this figure.
Lung injury induced by AG depends on MMPs
Considering the correlation of MMPs with the severity of TB (Hrabec et al,
2002; Ong et al,
2014; Kubler et al,
2015; Parasa et al,
2017; Sabir et al,
2019; Kumar et al,
2020), and the association of MMPs abundance in the lung with the severity of pulmonary pathology (Figs 1F–G, 2E and EV1G, Appendix Fig S1A–C), we further clarified whether MMPs contribute to the pathogenic effect of AG in vivo. We treated mice with the MMPs inhibitor marimastat (Skipper et al,
2009) and examined AG‐induced pathological changes in the lung. Inhibition of MMPs significantly reduced lung pathology of mice challenged with AG (Fig 4A and B). We conclude that AG caused lung injury through MMPs induction.
Figure 4
Lung injury induced by AG depends on MMPs
C57BL/6 mice were left untreated (NT) or were intraperitoneally treated with indicated amounts of AG for 3 days in the absence or presence of the MMP inhibitor marimastat (10 mg/kg) given intraperitoneally prior to AG stimulation. Lung sections stained with H&E (A) and quantification of lung lesion burden from H&E‐stained sections (B).
Data information: Data in (A) are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. Data in (B) are means ± SD of indicated numbers of mice from one of n = 3 independent experiments and each symbol represents data from 1 mouse. One‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test (B) was used for statistical analysis. ns, not significant; ****P < 0.0001. Scale bar, 200 μm.
Lung injury induced by AG depends on MMPs
C57BL/6 mice were left untreated (NT) or were intraperitoneally treated with indicated amounts of AG for 3 days in the absence or presence of the MMP inhibitor marimastat (10 mg/kg) given intraperitoneally prior to AG stimulation. Lung sections stained with H&E (A) and quantification of lung lesion burden from H&E‐stained sections (B).Data information: Data in (A) are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. Data in (B) are means ± SD of indicated numbers of mice from one of n = 3 independent experiments and each symbol represents data from 1 mouse. One‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test (B) was used for statistical analysis. ns, not significant; ****P < 0.0001. Scale bar, 200 μm.
AG interacts with galectin‐9
Given that AG causes lung damage through MMPs and hence acts as a detrimental virulence factor, we next set out to identify its receptor. To this end, we performed a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay (Olaru et al,
2015) to examine interactions of AG with galectins, which are cognates of the mammalian lectin family and bind to the β‐galactopyranoside‐containing carbohydrate moieties of glycoconjugates (Laaf et al,
2018). We obtained various galectins with high purity as demonstrated by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining (Fig EV2A). Although the chemical structure and conformation of β‐galactofuranoside (five‐member ring) differ markedly from those of β‐galactopyranoside (six‐member ring) (Fig EV2B), the SPR assay demonstrated the strongest binding affinity of AG to tandem‐repeat galectin‐9 (K
D = 22.3 μM) (Fig 5A) as compared to other galectins including galectin‐1, −3, −7, −8, −14, and LGALSL (Fig EV2, EV3, EV4, EV5). Galectin‐9 contains two carbohydrate recognition domains (CRDs) (Tureci et al,
1997). By using purified CRDs (Fig 5B), SPR assays revealed that CRD2, but not CRD1 of galectin‐9, strongly interacted with AG (K
D = 53.8 nM) (Figs 5C and EV2J). Although the N terminus of CRD1 starts at amino acid 16, the β‐sandwich fold of CRD1 originally starts at Ser6 in the crystal structure (Nagae et al,
2008). We therefore further purified the N terminus of galectin‐9 including amino acid 1–146 to avoid the destruction of the β‐sandwich fold of CRD1 (Fig EV2K). As demonstrated by the SPR assay, galectin‐9 (1–146) did not bind AG (Fig EV2L), indicating that the weak sugar affinity of CRD1 was not due to misfolding because of invalid construct design. Intriguingly, binding of CRD2 with AG was ca. 3 orders of magnitude higher than that of full‐length galectin‐9 (Fig 5A and C), suggesting that AG‐galectin‐9 binding may involve autoinhibition. To further verify whether galectin‐9 binds to Mtb directly, we harvested Mtb from a log phase culture in the presence of Tween‐80 and incubated these bacteria with galectins followed by FACS analysis. Galectin‐9, but not galectin‐3 or galectin‐8, was shown to specifically bind to Mtb H37Rv (Fig 5D). Galectin‐9 is also bound to other AG‐containing mycobacteria including M. bovis BCG and Mycobacterium smegmatis, but not AG‐deficient bacteria such as E. coli (Fig 5E). The binding of galectin‐9 with wild‐type and MMAR_5356 or MMAR_5357 knockdown mutants of M. marinum was further detected by FACS. The data revealed that tetracycline‐mediated knockdown of both genes led to profound attenuation of galectin‐9 binding (Fig 5F). Therefore, our results suggest that galectin‐9 plays an important role in AG sensing.
Figure EV2
Interaction of AG with galectins
Coomassie blue staining of galectin‐1, galectin‐3, galectin‐7, galectin‐8, galectin‐9, galectin‐14, and galectin‐related protein (LGALSL) post–SDS–PAGE analysis.
Chemical structures and conformations of β‐galactofuranoside and β‐galactopyranoside.
SPR assay of interactions of AG with indicated galectins including galectin‐1 (C), galectin‐3 (D), galectin‐7 (E), galectin‐8 (F), galectin‐14 (G), LGASL (H), and a summary table of KD (I). Curve fittings to a 1:1 Langmuir‐binding model calculated with TraceDrawer are shown as smooth black lines. The binding affinity of galectin‐9 and CRD2 to AG is highlighted in (I) in red.
SPR assay of interactions of AG with CRD1 of galectin‐9.
Coomassie blue staining of galectin‐9(1–146) and CRD2 of galectin‐9 post–SDS–PAGE analysis.
SPR assay of interactions of AG with galectin‐9(1–146).
Figure 5
AG interacts with galectin‐9
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay of the direct interaction of AG with galectin‐9. Curve fittings to a 1:1 Langmuir‐binding model calculated with TraceDrawer are shown as smooth black lines.
Coomassie blue‐stained SDS–PAGE of carbohydrate recognition domain CRD1 and CRD2 of galectin‐9. Data are representative of n = 3 independent experiments.
SPR assay of the interaction of AG with CRD2 of galectin‐9. Curve fittings to a 1:1 Langmuir‐binding model calculated with TraceDrawer are shown as smooth black lines.
FACS assay showing interactions of Mtb H37Rv with different galectins including galectin‐3, galectin‐8, and galectin‐9. The blank control was H37Rv staining with APC‐anti‐rabbit antibody alone.
FACS assay of interactions of galectin‐9 with mycobacteria including M. bovis BCG and M. smegmatis mc2155 as well as E. coli. The blank control was BCG staining with APC‐anti‐rabbit antibody alone. Data shown are representative of n = 3 independent experiments.
FACS assay of interactions of galectin‐9 with wild‐type M. marinum (Mm_WT) and MMAR‐5356 and MMAR‐5357 mutants of M. marinum treated with Tet. The blank control was Mm_WT staining with APC‐anti‐rabbit antibody alone. Data shown are representative of n = 3 independent experiments.
Figure EV3
Galectin‐9 is essential for AG‐induced expression of MMPs
Immunoblots of cell lysates of THP‐1 cells stably transfected with scrambled shRNA or shRNA targeting galectin‐9.
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9 (B), Mmp10 (C), and Mmp12 (D) mRNA from control or Galectin‐9 knockdown THP‐1 cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times.
Diagram showing the gRNA‐targeting genome sites.
Identification of galectin‐9 KO mice with PCR.
Data information: Data in (B–D) are means ± SD averaged from n = 3 independent experiments performed with technical triplicates, and each symbol represents the mean of technical triplicates. Data in (A, F) are representative of at least n = 2 independent experiments. Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (B–D) was used for statistical analysis, respectively. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; ****P < 0.0001.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Figure EV4
Interaction of Galectin‐9 with TAK1
Immunoblots and immunoprecipitation analysis of lysates of HEK293T cells transfected with various plasmids as indicated.
Diagram showing various constructs of plasmids including Galectin‐9, Galectin‐9(Δ147–225), Galectin‐9(1–146), and Galectin‐9(226–355).
Immunoblots and immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with plasmids as indicated.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Figure EV5
AG induces MMPs via TAK1 activation
Immunoblots of cell lysates of peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) in the absence or presence of TAK1 inhibitor 5Z‐7‐OZ (1 μM) for indicated times. Data are representative of n = 3 independent experiments.
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from peritoneal macrophages left unstimulated (NT) or stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) in the absence or presence of TAK1 inhibitor 5Z‐7‐OZ (1 μM) for 24 h.
Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times in the absence or presence of TAK1 inhibitor 5Z‐7‐OZ (1 μM); GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.
Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages infected with H37Rv for indicated times (MOI = 5) in the absence or presence of TAK1 inhibitor 5Z‐7‐OZ (1 μM); GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.
Immunoblots of cell lysates of HEK293T cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for the indicated time to analyze p‐ERK1/2 and p‐TAK1(T187). GADPH of cell lysates is shown as loading control.
Immunoblots of lysates of HEK293T cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 3 h after transfection of the indicated plasmids for 48 h.
Data information: Data in (B) are means ± SD averaged from 3 independent experiments performed with technical triplicates and each symbol represents the mean of technical triplicates. Two‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. ns, not significant; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Interaction of AG with galectins
Coomassie blue staining of galectin‐1, galectin‐3, galectin‐7, galectin‐8, galectin‐9, galectin‐14, and galectin‐related protein (LGALSL) post–SDS–PAGE analysis.Chemical structures and conformations of β‐galactofuranoside and β‐galactopyranoside.SPR assay of interactions of AG with indicated galectins including galectin‐1 (C), galectin‐3 (D), galectin‐7 (E), galectin‐8 (F), galectin‐14 (G), LGASL (H), and a summary table of KD (I). Curve fittings to a 1:1 Langmuir‐binding model calculated with TraceDrawer are shown as smooth black lines. The binding affinity of galectin‐9 and CRD2 to AG is highlighted in (I) in red.SPR assay of interactions of AG with CRD1 of galectin‐9.Coomassie blue staining of galectin‐9(1–146) and CRD2 of galectin‐9 post–SDS–PAGE analysis.SPR assay of interactions of AG with galectin‐9(1–146).
AG interacts with galectin‐9
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay of the direct interaction of AG with galectin‐9. Curve fittings to a 1:1 Langmuir‐binding model calculated with TraceDrawer are shown as smooth black lines.Coomassie blue‐stained SDS–PAGE of carbohydrate recognition domain CRD1 and CRD2 of galectin‐9. Data are representative of n = 3 independent experiments.SPR assay of the interaction of AG with CRD2 of galectin‐9. Curve fittings to a 1:1 Langmuir‐binding model calculated with TraceDrawer are shown as smooth black lines.FACS assay showing interactions of Mtb H37Rv with different galectins including galectin‐3, galectin‐8, and galectin‐9. The blank control was H37Rv staining with APC‐anti‐rabbit antibody alone.FACS assay of interactions of galectin‐9 with mycobacteria including M. bovis BCG and M. smegmatis mc2155 as well as E. coli. The blank control was BCG staining with APC‐anti‐rabbit antibody alone. Data shown are representative of n = 3 independent experiments.FACS assay of interactions of galectin‐9 with wild‐type M. marinum (Mm_WT) and MMAR‐5356 and MMAR‐5357 mutants of M. marinum treated with Tet. The blank control was Mm_WT staining with APC‐anti‐rabbit antibody alone. Data shown are representative of n = 3 independent experiments.
Galectin‐9 is essential for AG‐induced expression of MMPs
Immunoblots of cell lysates of THP‐1 cells stably transfected with scrambled shRNA or shRNA targeting galectin‐9.qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9 (B), Mmp10 (C), and Mmp12 (D) mRNA from control or Galectin‐9 knockdown THP‐1 cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times.Diagram showing the gRNA‐targeting genome sites.Identification of galectin‐9 KO mice with PCR.Data information: Data in (B–D) are means ± SD averaged from n = 3 independent experiments performed with technical triplicates, and each symbol represents the mean of technical triplicates. Data in (A, F) are representative of at least n = 2 independent experiments. Two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (B–D) was used for statistical analysis, respectively. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; ****P < 0.0001.Source data are available online for this figure.
Interaction of Galectin‐9 with TAK1
Immunoblots and immunoprecipitation analysis of lysates of HEK293T cells transfected with various plasmids as indicated.Diagram showing various constructs of plasmids including Galectin‐9, Galectin‐9(Δ147–225), Galectin‐9(1–146), and Galectin‐9(226–355).Immunoblots and immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with plasmids as indicated.Source data are available online for this figure.
AG induces MMPs via TAK1 activation
Immunoblots of cell lysates of peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) in the absence or presence of TAK1 inhibitor 5Z‐7‐OZ (1 μM) for indicated times. Data are representative of n = 3 independent experiments.qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from peritoneal macrophages left unstimulated (NT) or stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) in the absence or presence of TAK1 inhibitor 5Z‐7‐OZ (1 μM) for 24 h.Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times in the absence or presence of TAK1 inhibitor 5Z‐7‐OZ (1 μM); GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages infected with H37Rv for indicated times (MOI = 5) in the absence or presence of TAK1 inhibitor 5Z‐7‐OZ (1 μM); GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.Immunoblots of cell lysates of HEK293T cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for the indicated time to analyze p‐ERK1/2 and p‐TAK1(T187). GADPH of cell lysates is shown as loading control.Immunoblots of lysates of HEK293T cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 3 h after transfection of the indicated plasmids for 48 h.Data information: Data in (B) are means ± SD averaged from 3 independent experiments performed with technical triplicates and each symbol represents the mean of technical triplicates. Two‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. ns, not significant; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001.Source data are available online for this figure.
Galectin‐9 is essential for AG‐induced ERK‐mediated MMPs production
To determine the role of galectin‐9 in AG‐related functions, THP‐1 cells were stably transfected with shRNA specifically targeting Galectin‐9 for knockdown of its expression (Fig EV3A). Specific knockdown of galectin‐9 by shRNA markedly reduced the mRNA levels of MMPs in AG‐treated THP‐1 cells (Fig EV3, EV4, EV5). To characterize the function of galectin‐9 in more depth, we generated galectin‐9 knockout (KO) mice by CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated genome editing (Wang et al,
2013; Liu et al,
2017b) (Figs 6A and EV3E and F). The expression of MMPs in response to AG was markedly lower in macrophages isolated from Galectin‐9 KO mice as compared to wild‐type (Fig 6B–E). Moreover, deletion of galectin‐9 blocked secretion of MMPs including MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 in mouse macrophages in response to AG stimulation (Fig 6F). Furthermore, the secretion of MMPs in galectin‐9 KO macrophages was reduced as compared to that in wild‐type macrophages infected with Mtb H37Rv (Fig 6G).
Figure 6
Galectin‐9 is essential for AG‐induced production of MMPs
Immunoblots of cell lysates were performed to analyze galectin‐9 by mouse peritoneal macrophages isolated from WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice, and GADPH as a loading control.
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9 (B), Mmp10 (C), Mmp12 (D), and Mmp13 (E) from mouse peritoneal macrophages isolated from either wild‐type or Galectin‐9 KO mice stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h.
Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages isolated from WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times; GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.
Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages isolated from WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice infected with H37Rv for indicated times (MOI = 5); GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.
Immunoblot of lysates of peritoneal macrophages isolated from wild‐type and Galectin‐9 KO mice stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times. Data are representative of n = 3 independent experiments.
Immunoblot of lysates of shCtrl and shGalectin‐9 THP‐1 cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times. Data are representative of n = 3 independent experiments.
qRT–PCR detection of Mmp transcripts including Mmp9, Mmp10, and Mmp12 in wild‐type and Galectin‐9 KO peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h in the absence or presence of ERK inhibitor PD98059 (10 μM).
qRT–PCR detection of MMP transcripts including Mmp9, Mmp10, and Mmp12 in shCtrl and shGalectin‐9 THP‐1 cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h in the absence or presence of ERK inhibitor PD98059 (10 μM).
Data information: Data in (B to E, J, and K) are means ± SD averaged from 3 independent experiments performed with technical triplicates and each symbol represents the mean of technical triplicates. Two‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001 ****P < 0.0001.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Galectin‐9 is essential for AG‐induced production of MMPs
Immunoblots of cell lysates were performed to analyze galectin‐9 by mouse peritoneal macrophages isolated from WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice, and GADPH as a loading control.qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9 (B), Mmp10 (C), Mmp12 (D), and Mmp13 (E) from mouse peritoneal macrophages isolated from either wild‐type or Galectin‐9 KO mice stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h.Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages isolated from WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times; GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.Immunoblots of cell supernatants to analyze secreted MMP9, MMP10, MMP12, and MMP13 by mouse peritoneal macrophages isolated from WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice infected with H37Rv for indicated times (MOI = 5); GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control.Immunoblot of lysates of peritoneal macrophages isolated from wild‐type and Galectin‐9 KO mice stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times. Data are representative of n = 3 independent experiments.Immunoblot of lysates of shCtrl and shGalectin‐9 THP‐1 cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times. Data are representative of n = 3 independent experiments.qRT–PCR detection of Mmp transcripts including Mmp9, Mmp10, and Mmp12 in wild‐type and Galectin‐9 KO peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h in the absence or presence of ERK inhibitor PD98059 (10 μM).qRT–PCR detection of MMP transcripts including Mmp9, Mmp10, and Mmp12 in shCtrl and shGalectin‐9 THP‐1 cells stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h in the absence or presence of ERK inhibitor PD98059 (10 μM).Data information: Data in (B to E, J, and K) are means ± SD averaged from 3 independent experiments performed with technical triplicates and each symbol represents the mean of technical triplicates. Two‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001 ****P < 0.0001.Source data are available online for this figure.We next interrogated whether AG activates ERK to induce MMPs through galectin‐9. Knockdown or KO of galectin‐9 significantly reduced AG‐induced activation of corresponding signaling cascades such as MAPKs including ERK, p38, and JNK, as well as NF‐κB in both murine and human macrophages (Fig 6H and I), suggesting that AG activates MAPKs and NF‐κB signaling pathways through galectin‐9. Finally, AG‐induced MMP expression did not differ in either galectin‐9 knockdown or KO cells when ERK was inhibited by the specific inhibitor PD98059 (Fig 6J and K). Collectively, these data suggest an essential role of galectin‐9 in the activation of ERK signaling by AG to induce the expression of MMPs.
Association of galectin‐9 with TAK1 is essential for activation of downstream events by AG
To gain deeper insights into the mechanism underlying the nature of galectin‐9 activation of MAPK signaling and MMP expression, we assessed the interaction between galectin‐9 and MAPK signaling molecules. Galectin‐9 was found to interact with transforming growth factor β‐activated kinase 1 (TAK1) in HEK293T cells (Fig EV4A), which is consistent with recent reports that galectin‐9 associates with TAK1 in response to endomembrane damage (Jia et al,
2018; Jia et al,
2020). Upon treatment of AG, the interaction of endogenous TAK1 to galectin‐9 was increased in both THP‐1 cells and primary peritoneal macrophages (Fig 7A and B), indicative of a stimulus‐dependent interaction between galectin‐9 and TAK1. Moreover, an in vitro GST pull‐down assay revealed direct interaction of galectin‐9 with TAK1 (Fig 7C). Confocal microscopy revealed increased colocalization of galectin‐9 with TAK1 in response to AG stimulation or Mtb infection (Fig 7D). To further map the region of galectin‐9 which mediates its interaction with TAK1, we generated different galectin‐9 truncated constructs (Fig EV4B). Co‐IP experiments demonstrated that the CRD2 domain, but not the linker region or CRD1 of galectin‐9 is critical for its interaction with TAK1 (Fig EV4C). In combination with our finding that AG stimulation or Mtb infection enhances the interaction of galectin‐9 with TAK1, we propose that binding of AG to galectin‐9 CRD2 domain leads to conformational changes, which in turn enhanced recruitment of TAK1.
Figure 7
Galectin‐9 mediates TAK1 recruitment to induce production of MMPs
Immunoblots and immunoprecipitation of cell lysates to analyze endogenous interaction of galectin‐9 with TAK1 by human THP‐1 cells (A) or mouse peritoneal macrophages (B) left unstimulated or stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 1 h.
In vitro glutathione S‐transferase (GST) precipitation assay purified histidine (His)‐tagged Galectin‐9 (+) with GST alone or GST‐tagged TAK1.
Confocal microscopy of mouse peritoneal macrophages left untreated (NC) (upper row) or stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 2 h (middle row) or infected with H37Rv for 3 h (MOI = 5) (bottom row), staining with anti‐Galectin‐9 and anti‐TAK1 antibody. DAPI, nuclei, blue. Scale bar, 5 μm. Data in the right graph show mean ± SD of n = 12 fields from three independent experiments. The symbols indicate the colocalization ratio of at least 10 cells in each field.
Immunoblots of cell lysates to analyze phosphorylated TAK1 by mouse peritoneal macrophages isolated from WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times; GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control. Data are representative of at least n = 3 independent experiments.
Immunoblots of cell lysates of peritoneal macrophages isolated from WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) in the absence or presence of TAK1 inhibitor 5Z‐7‐OZ (1 μM) for indicated times. Data are representative of n = 3 independent experiments.
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9 (G), Mmp10 (H), Mmp12 (I), and Mmp13 (J) from WT or Galectin‐9 KO mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h in the absence or presence of TAK1 inhibitor 5Z‐7‐OZ (1 μM).
Data information: Data in (G to J) are means ± SD averaged from 3 independent experiments performed with technical triplicates, and each symbol represents the mean of technical triplicates. Two‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 ****P < 0.0001.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Galectin‐9 mediates TAK1 recruitment to induce production of MMPs
Immunoblots and immunoprecipitation of cell lysates to analyze endogenous interaction of galectin‐9 with TAK1 by human THP‐1 cells (A) or mouse peritoneal macrophages (B) left unstimulated or stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 1 h.In vitro glutathione S‐transferase (GST) precipitation assay purified histidine (His)‐tagged Galectin‐9 (+) with GST alone or GST‐tagged TAK1.Confocal microscopy of mouse peritoneal macrophages left untreated (NC) (upper row) or stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 2 h (middle row) or infected with H37Rv for 3 h (MOI = 5) (bottom row), staining with anti‐Galectin‐9 and anti‐TAK1 antibody. DAPI, nuclei, blue. Scale bar, 5 μm. Data in the right graph show mean ± SD of n = 12 fields from three independent experiments. The symbols indicate the colocalization ratio of at least 10 cells in each field.Immunoblots of cell lysates to analyze phosphorylated TAK1 by mouse peritoneal macrophages isolated from WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for indicated times; GADPH of cell lysates served as the loading control. Data are representative of at least n = 3 independent experiments.Immunoblots of cell lysates of peritoneal macrophages isolated from WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) in the absence or presence of TAK1 inhibitor 5Z‐7‐OZ (1 μM) for indicated times. Data are representative of n = 3 independent experiments.qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9 (G), Mmp10 (H), Mmp12 (I), and Mmp13 (J) from WT or Galectin‐9 KO mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with AG (1 μg/ml) for 24 h in the absence or presence of TAK1 inhibitor 5Z‐7‐OZ (1 μM).Data information: Data in (G to J) are means ± SD averaged from 3 independent experiments performed with technical triplicates, and each symbol represents the mean of technical triplicates. Two‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 ****P < 0.0001.Source data are available online for this figure.Since galectin‐9 interacts with TAK1, we next examined whether galectin‐9 regulates the activation of TAK1. Knockout of galectin‐9 abrogated AG‐induced phosphorylation of TAK1 on Thr 187 (Fig 7E), which is critical for its activation (Singhirunnusorn et al,
2005). Furthermore, inhibition of TAK1 by a selective inhibitor, 5Z‐7‐oxozeaenol (5Z‐7‐OZ) (Ninomiya‐Tsuji et al,
2003), impaired AG‐induced activation of MAPKs including ERK, JNK, and p38 as well as NF‐κB (Fig EV5A). However, impaired AG‐induced downstream signaling by TAK1 inhibitor was not observed in galectin‐9 KO macrophages (Fig 7F). Our results suggest that galectin‐9 activates TAK1, triggering the downstream MAPK signaling. To clarify the relationship between the binding with AG and phosphorylation of TAK1, we analyzed whether the CRD2 of galectin‐9, which is critical for its interaction with AG and TAK1 (Figs 5C and EV4C), is sufficient for TAK1 activation. AG stimulation caused the phosphorylation of TAK1 and EKR in HEK23T cells (Fig EV5E). Overexpression of galectin‐9 enhanced AG‐induced TAK1 and ERK activation in HEK293T cells (Fig EV5F). Of note, overexpression of CRD2 alone, but not of CRD1 alone, induced the activation of TAK1 and ERK in HEK293T cells (Fig EV5F). This shows that the formation of the AG‐galectin‐9‐TAK1 complex is critical for the activation of TAK1 and downstream signaling.We next examined the effect of galectin‐9/TAK1 signaling on MMPs expression. Inhibition of TAK1 by 5Z‐7‐OZ abrogated AG‐induced expression and secretion of MMPs in primary peritoneal macrophages (Fig EV5B and C). Moreover, the secretion of MMPs was also profoundly reduced in macrophages infected with Mtb H37Rv when the cells were treated with TAK1 inhibitor 5Z‐7‐OZ (Fig EV5D). However, the blockade of MMPs expression by TAK1 inhibition was not detected in those galectin‐9 KO counterparts (Fig 7G–J). We conclude that galectin‐9 activates TAK1 to induce the expression of MMPs through MAPK signaling.
Galectin‐9 is essential for the in vivo activity of AG
To characterize the functional consequences of AG sensing by galectin‐9 in vivo, we treated wild‐type or Galectin‐9 KO mice with AG. The deletion of galectin‐9 dramatically reduced the abundances of MMPs transcripts in the lungs of mice receiving intraperitoneal administration of AG (Fig 8A) and consistently, in the lungs of Galectin‐9 KO mice treated with AG‐ameliorated pathological damage, as compared to controls (Fig 8B and C). Furthermore, inhibition of MMPs by marimastat ameliorated pulmonary damage of wild‐type mice but not of galectin‐9 KO mice (Fig 8B and C). We conclude that AG causes pulmonary injury through galectin‐9‐mediated MMPs expression.
Figure 8
Galectin‐9 is essential for the in vivo effects of AG
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from the lungs of WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice at 3 days post‐intraperitoneal administration of AG (100 μg).
WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice were intraperitoneally treated with AG for 3 days in the absence or presence of the MMP inhibitor marimastat (10 mg/kg) given intraperitoneally prior to AG stimulation. Lung sections stained with H&E (B) and quantification of lung lesion burden from H&E‐stained sections (C).
WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice were intranasally infected with H37Rv for 4 weeks in absence or presence of intranasally administrated AG aptamers (1 μg) once at a 1‐week interval. Lung sections stained with H&E (D) and quantification of lung lesion burden from H&E‐stained sections (E).
CFU quantification of the bacterial titers of lung tissue homogenates from WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice intranasally infected with H37Rv for 4 weeks in the absence or presence of intranasally administrated AG aptamers (1 μg) once at a 1‐week interval.
Data information: Data in (B and D) are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. Data in (A, C, E, F) are means ± SD of the indicated number of mice from 1 of n = 3 independent experiments and each symbol represents data from 1 mouse. Two‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001. Scale bar, 200 μm.
Galectin‐9 is essential for the in vivo effects of AG
qPCR analysis of Mmps including Mmp9, Mmp10, Mmp12, and Mmp13 from the lungs of WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice at 3 days post‐intraperitoneal administration of AG (100 μg).WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice were intraperitoneally treated with AG for 3 days in the absence or presence of the MMP inhibitor marimastat (10 mg/kg) given intraperitoneally prior to AG stimulation. Lung sections stained with H&E (B) and quantification of lung lesion burden from H&E‐stained sections (C).WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice were intranasally infected with H37Rv for 4 weeks in absence or presence of intranasally administrated AG aptamers (1 μg) once at a 1‐week interval. Lung sections stained with H&E (D) and quantification of lung lesion burden from H&E‐stained sections (E).CFU quantification of the bacterial titers of lung tissue homogenates from WT or Galectin‐9 KO mice intranasally infected with H37Rv for 4 weeks in the absence or presence of intranasally administrated AG aptamers (1 μg) once at a 1‐week interval.Data information: Data in (B and D) are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. Data in (A, C, E, F) are means ± SD of the indicated number of mice from 1 of n = 3 independent experiments and each symbol represents data from 1 mouse. Two‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001. Scale bar, 200 μm.To further clarify the physiological relevance of the AG‐galectin‐9 axis in natural infection, we infected wild‐type or galectin‐9 KO mice with Mtb in the absence or presence of AG aptamer, and analyzed tissue damage and mycobacterial growth in the lung. Deletion of galectin‐9 markedly reduced pathological impairments in the lung of Mtb‐infected mice, and treatment with the AG aptamer alleviated the pathologic impairments in the lung of Mtb‐infected WT mice, but not of Mtb‐infected galectin‐9 KO mice (Fig 8D and E). The findings indicate that AG induces lung tissue damage through galectin‐9. Consistent with previous reports on anti‐TB effects of galectin‐9 (Jayaraman et al,
2010; Sada‐Ovalle et al,
2012; Chavez‐Galan et al,
2017; Jia et al,
2018), we observed that the KO of galectin‐9 moderately enhanced mycobacterial growth in the lung (Fig 8F). However, administration of the AG aptamer significantly reduced the bacterial load in the lung of Mtb‐infected WT mice, but not of Mtb‐infected galectin‐9 KO mice (Fig 8F), indicating that AG promotes the growth of Mtb through galectin‐9. Together, our results suggest that the AG‐galectin‐9 axis aggravates the pathogenesis of murine M. tuberculosis infection.
Discussion
Sensing of bacterial molecular components is critical for the host to generate protective or pathogenic immune responses (Orme et al,
2015; Dorhoi & Kaufmann, 2016). One striking characteristic feature of Mtb is its unusual AG‐containing cell wall which is a frequent structural and bio‐synthetical target for anti‐TB drug development (Jankute et al,
2015; Grzegorzewicz et al,
2016). Intriguingly, we demonstrate that mycobacterial AG interacts with galectin‐9. Interaction of AG with galectin‐9 activated TAK1‐ERK MAP kinase to induce the expression of MMPs. Moreover, KO of galectin‐9 or inhibition of MMPs blocked AG‐induced lung injury. Thus, AG qualifies as a virulence factor of Mtb that is recognized by galectin‐9, providing a molecular mechanism for the functions of AG and galectin‐9 in TB (Appendix Fig S4).Mtb possesses an unusual cell wall: Its inner layer is comprised of peptidoglycan, the middle layer of a highly branched AG, and the outer layer of long‐chain mycolic acids (Jankute et al,
2015). Both peptidoglycans and mycolic acids are well known as important PAMPs that trigger a cascade of innate immune responses (Korf et al,
2005; Verschoor et al,
2012; Wolf et al,
2016; Wolf & Underhill, 2018; Lu et al,
2019; Tahiri et al,
2020; Bastos et al,
2021). AG is an essential component of the hydrophobic and highly impermeable cell wall of Mtb; however, its biological function remains elusive. It has been previously reported that AG binds to NKp44 on the surface of natural killer (NK) cells, but fails to induce their activation (Esin et al,
2013). Moreover, the presence of a galactosamine substituent in the AG of Mtb has been found to abrogate the full maturation of human peripheral blood monocyte‐derived DCs (Wheat et al,
2015). Here, we demonstrate that in vivo administration of AG causes pathological impairments in the lung, while AG‐specific aptamers alleviated Mtb‐induced lung injury and moderately extended survival of Mtb‐infected SCID mice or M. marinum‐infected zebrafish. Given that TB is primarily a pulmonary disease, and that cavitation of the lung promotes the efficient spread of the pathogen, our findings identify AG as a previously unrecognized molecular component of the pathogenic signature of Mtb. Considering that the blockade of AG by aptamers only showed minor effects on Mtb survival in the lung of infected mice, AG may aggravate the pathology of Mtb infection largely by modulation of lung lesions.Mtb infection leads to increased secretion of matrix‐degrading enzymes, MMPs, which are closely associated with the severity of lung injury in pulmonary TB (Walker et al,
2012; Ordonez et al,
2016). Deep sequencing indicates that AG strongly induces the expression of MMPs, and, reciprocally, that AG‐specific aptamers or genetic knockdown of AG synthesis genes markedly reduce MMP induction both in vitro and in vivo by Mtb, BCG, or M. marinum. These findings point to AG as a major mycobacterial inducer of MMPs. Furthermore, treatment with the MMP inhibitor marimastat (Skipper et al,
2009) profoundly reduced the pulmonary pathology of mice challenged with AG. Therefore, AG qualifies as a critical virulence factor of Mtb which contributes to lung injury through MMPs production in the pathogenesis of TB. It remains to be determined whether AG regulates the formation of granulomatous cavities (Walker et al,
2012; Ordonez et al,
2016).It is well established that Mtb infection causes upregulation of MMPs in monocytic cells and mouse lungs (Rivera‐Marrero et al,
2002; Rand et al,
2009; Lou et al,
2017; Sabir et al,
2019). The cell wall glycolipid lipoarabinomannan (LAM) induces expression of MMP9 in THP‐1 cells through mannose receptor‐mediated activation of p38, and transcriptional activation by activator protein‐1 (AP‐1) (Rivera‐Marrero et al,
2002). ESAT‐6, a virulence factor of Mtb, drives ERK and p38 MAPK‐dependent expression of MMP‐10 (Brilha et al,
2017). Here, we demonstrate that AG upregulates the expression and secretion of MMPs through activation of the TAK1‐ERK signaling pathway. TAK1 plays a key role in cellular responses to a variety of stimuli by triggering the activation of downstream effectors (Ajibade et al,
2013). Our recent work demonstrated that TAK1 serves as an important trigger for protective immunity against Mtb infection by inducing both Il6 and Il12b (Zheng, et al,
2018a). Moreover, we demonstrated previously that TAK1 is activated by Mtb infection through oxidation by Mtb‐secreted protein MPT53 (Wang et al,
2019). Our present work demonstrates that the AG‐galectin‐9 axis is critical for the activation of TAK1, adding a novel layer to the complexity in the regulation of TAK1. Moreover, we demonstrate that the galectin‐9‐TAK1 pathway is exploited by AG as an Mtb virulence factor that causes lung injury by inducing MMPs, emphasizing a detrimental role of TAK1 in TB.Accumulating evidence has revealed an immunomodulatory role of galectin‐9 in multiple immune cell types including B cells, T cells, NK cells, eosinophils, mast cells, and mononuclear phagocytes (Rabinovich & Toscano, 2009; Wiersma et al,
2013; Cao et al,
2018; Giovannone et al,
2018). Galectin‐9 has been shown to be secreted or to exert its function in the nucleus or cytoplasm (Kanwar et al,
1997; Heusschen et al,
2013). Increasing evidence suggests that galectins are important for the formation of signalosomes and subsequent signaling activation (Laderach et al,
2010). Recently, galectin‐9 has also been found to sense lysosomal damage signaling and to form a complex with TAK1(Jia et al,
2018; Jia et al,
2019; Jia et al,
2020). By confocal microscopy assay, we observed colocalization of galectin‐9 with TAK1 in the cytosol in response to AG stimulation or Mtb infection. We conclude that galectin‐9 is a cytosolic receptor of AG. Moreover, coimmunoprecipitation assays with truncated mutants of galectin‐9 demonstrated that CRD2, but not CRD1 or the linker region of galectin‐9 mediated its interaction with TAK1. In combination with the finding that AG stimulation or Mtb infection enhanced the interaction of galectin‐9 with TAK1, we propose that binding of AG to galectin‐9 CRD2 domain causes conformational changes of CRD2, which in turn enhances recruitment of TAK1 and formation of the galectin‐9/TAK1 signaling complex. Hence, we consider TAK1 as a central kinase of signal transduction from galectin‐9 to downstream MAPK activation and MMP production.Our data reveal a direct interaction of galectin‐9 with AG, and binding of galectin‐9 to AG‐containing but not to AG‐deficient mycobacteria. Importantly, the knockdown of genes involved in AG biosynthesis including MMAR_5356 and MMAR_5357 markedly reduced galectin‐9 binding. Hence, galectin‐9 plays a critical role in mycobacterial AG sensing. Of note, AG is hidden and surrounded by the outermost mycomembrane layer in mycobacteria. Hence, the detergent Tween‐80 present in the culture medium could disrupt the outer layer of the mycobacterial cell wall and expose AG to the galectin‐9 binding. During natural infection, the harsh environment in the phagosome and lysosome could lead to AG shedding from the Mtb cell wall and leakage of AG into the cytosol through the damaged membrane. This process could facilitate the engagement of galectin‐9 and activation of TAK1 in the cytosol. Moreover, it has been reported that during replication, bacteria can expose the newly synthesized AG (Meniche et al,
2014), which in turn could be recognized by galectin‐9. Therefore, we consider galectin‐9 as a cytosolic receptor for AG released from invading mycobacteria in the phagosome/lysosome or from replicating mycobacteria in the cytosol during intracellular Mtb infection (van der Wel et al,
2007; Houben et al,
2012; Simeone et al,
2015; Chai et al,
2020). Mycolic acids have been found to form an integral component of the mycolyl‐arabinogalactan‐peptidoglycan (mAGP) complex which is bound galectin‐3 (Liu et al,
1996; Barboni et al,
2005). Yet, evidence for the direct interaction of galectin with AG is missing. In our study, we took advantage of the first complete synthesis of a mycobacterial AG composed of 92 mono‐saccharide units (Wu et al,
2017), and harnessed the chemically synthesized AG for in‐depth evaluation of its biological functions. Our work demonstrated that AG interacted with galectin‐9 directly, which for the first time provides solid evidence for the direct interaction of AG with a host lectin galectin‐9. Our finding, therefore, emphasizes the impressively broad range of sensors for mycobacteria (Killick et al,
2013; Moura‐Alves et al,
2014; Liu et al,
2017a).Of note, galectins interact with the β‐galactopyranoside‐containing carbohydrate moieties of glycoconjugates (Laaf et al,
2018), and the OH4 and OH6 of β‐galactopyranoside are critical for its interaction with galectins (Chan et al,
2018). However, AG harbors β‐galactofuranoside (five‐member ring), the chemical structure and conformation of which differ markedly from those of β‐galactopyranoside (six‐member ring). β‐galactofuranose lacks both OH4 and OH6 at the equivalent positions, indicating that β‐galactofuranoside cannot mediate the interaction of AG with galectin‐9. Of note, chemically synthesized AG used in this study is a highly complex polysaccharide composed of 92 sugar units, which not only contains β‐galactofuranose residues, but also numerous α‐ and β‐arabinofuranose residues. Moreover, the tertiary structure of AG could be responsible for its interaction with galectin‐9. Hence, the precise mechanisms underlying interactions of AG with galectin‐9 await the crystal structure analysis of the AG‐galectin‐9 complex.Consistent with a previous report that galectin‐9 KO slightly enhances mycobacterial survival in macrophages (Jayaraman et al,
2010), our data demonstrate that deletion of galectin‐9 resulted in a moderate increase in bacterial burden in the lung. However, we also found that deletion of galectin‐9 ameliorated inflammation as shown by H&E staining. Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that ameliorated inflammation in galectin‐9 KO mice results in a failure to control mycobacterial replication. Consistent with this, multiple pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐6 and IL‐1β have been shown to control mycobacterial growth (Ladel et al,
1997; Mayer‐Barber et al,
2014; Sousa et al,
2020; Wang et al,
2020). Alternatively, galectin‐9 may regulate both inflammation and bactericidal growth directly in an uncoupled manner. Sensing of AG by galectin‐9 as a prerequisite for lung injury may separate this pathway from galectin‐9‐mediated antimicrobial immunity (Jayaraman et al,
2010; Sada‐Ovalle et al,
2012; Chavez‐Galan et al,
2017). Accordingly, although galectin‐9 moderately inhibited Mtb survival in the lung, engagement of galectin‐9 by AG slightly increased pulmonary Mtb burden as demonstrated by AG aptamer treatment in WT and galectin‐9 KO mice infected with Mtb. Galectin‐9 has been shown to control phagosome biology (Jia et al,
2018; Jia et al,
2020) and also to control Mtb through caspase‐1‐dependent IL‐1β production by ligation of T cell Ig and mucin domain 3 (Tim3) (Jayaraman et al,
2010; Sada‐Ovalle et al,
2012; Chavez‐Galan et al,
2017). Although galectin‐9‐mediated TAK1 activation apparently represents the converging signaling event in response to both endomembrane damage and AG stimulation, our finding that sensing of AG by galectin‐9 is a prerequisite for lung injury separates this pathway from galectin‐9‐mediated antimicrobial immunity (Jayaraman et al,
2010; Sada‐Ovalle et al,
2012; Chavez‐Galan et al,
2017; Jia et al,
2018). These findings emphasize the versatile role of galectin‐9 in TB. Hence, our study can form the basis for the rational development of a novel type of host‐directed therapy targeting AG‐galectin‐9 interactions in adjunct to canonical drug therapy in TB.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580, MEK/ERK inhibitor PD98059, NF‐κB inhibitor PDTC, JNK inhibitor SP600125, and pan‐MMP inhibitor Marimastat were obtained from MedChem Express. TAK1 inhibitor 5Z‐7‐oxozeaenol was purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich. The following antibodies were used: phospho‐p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204) (#4370), Phospho‐p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182) (D3F9) (#4511), Phospho‐SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) (81E11) (#4668), phospho‐NF‐κB p65 (Ser536)(93H1) (#3033), Phospho‐TAK1 (Thr187) Antibody(#4536), anti‐galectin‐9 antibody (54330), anti–β‐actin (#4970), Anti‐rabbit IgG (H + L), F(ab')2 Fragment (Alexa Fluor® 488 Conjugate) (#4412), Anti‐mouse IgG (H + L), F(ab')2 Fragment (Alexa Fluor® 555 Conjugate) (#4409), horseradish peroxidase (HRP)‐conjugated anti‐rabbit or anti‐mouse IgG (all from Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA). Anti‐galectin‐3 antibody [EP2775Y] (ab76245), anti‐galectin‐8 antibody [EPR4857] (ab109519) and anti‐galectin‐9 antibody [EPR22214] (ab227046) were purchased from Abcam for FACS analysis. APC‐conjugated F(ab')2‐Goat anti‐Rabbit IgG (H + L) Cross‐Adsorbed Secondary Antibody (Invitrogen™) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Anti‐MMP2 (GB11130), Anti‐MMP9 (GB12132‐1), Anti‐MMP13 (GB11247‐1) was purchased from Servicebio (Wuhan, China), Anti‐MMP10 (A3033) and Anti‐MMP12 (A1709) was purchased from Abclonal (Wuhan, China), and Anti‐TAK1 (sc‐166562) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Texas, USA). Recombinant galectin‐1 (C285), galectin‐3 (C846), galectin‐7 (C069), galectin‐8 (C081), galectin‐9 (C808), galectin‐14 (C803), and LGALSL (Ce89) were purchased from Novoprotein (Shanghai, China).
Cell culture
THP‐1 cells (human monocytic cell line, ATCC TIB‐202) were cultured in RPMI 1640 (GIBCO) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat‐inactivated fetal bovine serum (Sigma‐Aldrich, F0804), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco, 11360070), 2 mM l‐glutamine (Gibco, 25030081), 10 mM HEPES buffer (Gibco, 15630080), pH 7.2‐7.5, and 50 µM 2‐mercaptoethanol (Gibco, 31350010). THP‐1 cells were differentiated into macrophages by treatment with 200 nM PMA (Sigma‐Aldrich) for 24 h and then left rested for another 48 h for differentiation followed by subsequent experiments. Cells were maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2. A LookOut Mycoplasma PCR Detection Kit (MP0035, Sigma‐Aldrich) was applied for screening of mycoplasma contamination. All cells included in the study were confirmed to be free of mycoplasma.
Bacterial strains and culturing conditions
The mycobacterial strains, Mtb H37Rv, M. bovis BCG, and M. smegmatis mc2155, were grown in Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD) with 0.05% Tween‐80 and 10% oleic acid‐albumin‐dextrose‐catalase (OADC) (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD). Mycobacterium
marinum M strain was cultured in Middlebrook 7H9 broth containing 0.2% glycerol, 10% ADC (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) or on 7H10 agar supplemented with 0.5% glycerol and 10% OADC (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) at 30°C under aerobic conditions. E. coli DH5α was grown in LB medium.
Animal model
Galectin‐9 KO mice were generated by CRISPR/Cas9 method (Wang et al,
2013; Liu et al,
2017b) following the procedures described previously (Liu et al,
2018a; Zheng et al,
2018b). The Galectin‐9 sgRNA were designed by targeting the exon 2 of galectin‐9 and the sequences were sgRNA‐1: GAACTTAGGGTCCCTCGTAG, sgRNA‐2: CCCTTTACTGGACCAATCCA, and sgRNA‐3: GTCAACGGTGCTAAGATGGC. C57BL/6n female mice (7–8 weeks old) were used as embryo donors. C57BL/6n female mice were superovulated by intraperitoneal injection of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) and then mated to C57BL/6n male mice. The fertilized embryos (zygotes) were collected from oviducts. Cas9 mRNA (100 ng/µl) and sgRNA (25 ng/µl) targeting Galectin‐9 were mixed and injected into the cytoplasm of fertilized eggs with both pronuclei visible in CZB (Chatot‐Ziomek‐Bavister) medium. The injected zygotes were then cultured in Quinn’s Advantage cleavage medium (In‐Vitro Fertilization, Inc.) for about 24 h, and every 18–20 2‐cell stage embryos were transferred into the oviduct of a pseudopregnant ICR female mouse at 0.5 days post‐coitus. To determine the nucleotide sequences of mutated alleles, DNA sequencing of F0 mice was performed after TA cloning into plasmid pMD19T (TAKARA). To obtain F1 Galectin‐9 KO mice, F0 mice were crossed with C57BL/6n, and newborn generations were genotyped by Sanger sequencing. Genomic DNA was extracted from tail tips, and the PCR‐based genotyping was performed. The genotyping primer sequences for genotyping are Galectin‐9_F: TCACCTCCTACAGACTGGGG and Galectin‐9_R: GGACCTTCTCTGCAACACCA.Female C57BL/6n mice (6–8 weeks old) were purchased from Shanghai Laboratory Animal Center (Shanghai, China). All mice were kept under specific pathogen‐free (SPF) conditions at the Laboratory Animal Center of Tongji University. All experiments were approved by Tongji University School of Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted following the National Institutes of Health U.S.A (NIH) Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Mouse macrophage isolation and infection
Peritoneal macrophages were isolated as described (Kong et al,
2009). Briefly, mice received intraperitoneally 2.0 ml of 4% Brewer’s thioglycollate medium (B2551, Sigma‐Aldrich). After 3 days, peritoneal exudate cells were collected from euthanized animals using 10 ml cold PBS. Subsequently, cells were plated in 12‐well plates at 106 cells/well in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS plus penicillin/streptomycin and were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 2 h. Cultures were washed three times with PBS to remove non‐adherent cells, and the remaining adherent monolayer cells were used as primary peritoneal macrophages. Before infection, Mtb organisms were suspended in a complete medium without antibiotics. Peritoneal macrophages were infected with Mtb at an MOI of 5.
Generation of stable cell lines
Lentivirus‐mediated knockdown of specific genes was performed as described previously (Liu et al,
2018b). HEK293T cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with pSPAX2, pMD2.G, and pLKO.1 harboring shRNA targeting human LGALS9 (GTACCGGCCCTCCTCTCTGACCTTTAACCTCGAGGTTAAAGGTCAGAGAGGAGGGTTTTTTG, TRCN0000381715, Sigma‐Aldrich) or scrambled shRNA. Viral supernatants were harvested 48 h after transfection and were concentrated using an SW‐28 rotor. THP‐1 cells were infected with concentrated virus in the presence of polybrene (10 μg/ml). THP‐1 cells stably transfected with shRNA targeting LGALS9 (shGalectin‐9) or with scramble shRNA (shCtrl) were isolated by puromycin selection (5 μg/ml).
Chemical synthesis of AG
Full‐length AG composed of 92 mono‐saccharide units was synthesized following the reported procedure (Wu et al,
2017) and was used throughout the functional study.
Purification of recombinant His‐tagged CRDs of galectin‐9
Truncated human galectin‐9 including galectin‐9 (1–146), CRD1 (16–146), and CRD2 (207–355) cDNA was subcloned into a pET28a vector and BL21 (DE3)‐competent E. coli bacteria were then transfected with these constructs. Bacteria were grown in Luria‐Bertani (LB) liquid medium to an optical density (OD) at 600 nm (OD600) of approximately 0.8. Subsequently, cells were induced with isopropyl β‐D‐1‐thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG, 0.1 mM) overnight at 16°C. Recombinant CRD1 and CRD2 were purified from bacterial lysates using a (Ni)‐chelating Sepharose Fast Flow (SFF) column (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). The concentration of galectin‐9 (1–146), CRD1, and CRD2 protein were measured with a Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR)
The interaction of galectins with AG was detected by OpenSPRTM (Nicoya Lifesciences, Waterloo, Canada). Briefly, galectins proteins including galectin‐1, −3, −7, −8, −9, −14, and LGALSL as well as galectin‐9 (1–146), CRD1 and CRD2 of galectin‐9 were fixed on the COOH sensor chip by capture‐coupling, then AG at indicated concentrations was injected sequentially into the chamber in PBS at 25°C. The binding time and disassociation time were both 240 s with the flow rate of 20 μl/min. The chip was regenerated with 0.02% SDS. A one‐to‐one diffusion corrected model was fitted to the wavelength shifts corresponding to the varied glycan concentration. The kinetic constants, including the association constant (ka), dissociation constant (kd), and affinity (KD, K
D = kd/ka), were analyzed with TraceDrawer software (Ridgeview Instruments AB, Sweden).
MMAR_5356 and MMAR_5357 knockdown M. marinum
MMAR_5356 and MMAR_5357 knockdown strains are derivatives of M. marinum Aronson (ATCC: BAA‐535; M strain) generated following published protocols (Rock et al,
2017). The recombinant plasmids encompassed MMAR_5356 and MMAR_5357 sgRNA (5′‐gggctgttcgtccgcgctga‐3′ or 5′‐ggcgccccgctacgcagtgg‐3, respectively) with plasmids PLJR962 in BsmB1 restriction site was constructed by homologous recombination. Primers for fragments of MMAR_5356 are MMAR_5536‐1‐F: 5′‐gggagggctgttcgtccgcgctgacgtctcggtttttgtactcgaaag‐3′ and MMAR_5536‐1‐R: 5′‐accaggtccgacatatcgatac‐3′; MMAR_5536‐2‐F: 5′‐ tcagcgcggacgaacagccctcccagattatatctatcactgata‐3′ and MMAR_5536‐2‐R: 5′‐gtatcgatatgtcggacctggt‐3′. Primers for fragments of MMAR_5357 are MMAR_5537‐F: 5′‐gggaggcgccccgctacgcagtggcgtctcggtttttgtactcgaaag‐3′ and MMAR_5537‐R: 5′‐accaggtccgacatatcgatac‐3′. Fragments of genes were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using corresponding primers and linked by homologous recombinase (Vazyme Biotech). The ligated products were transformed into competent E. coli DH5α and screened with kanamycin to obtain recombinants. Recombinant plasmids of the correct sequence were then electroporated into M. marinum Aronson competent cells. After resuscitation in 7H9 broth (Difco) for 7 h, recombinant mycobacterial strains were further screened with 7H10 broth (Difco) containing 25 μg/ml Kanamycin.Positive clones were grown to log phase in 7H9 broth containing 25 μg/ml Kanamycin, followed by dilution in 7H9 broth with 100 ng/ml ATc (anhydrotetracycline) to 0.1 OD600 (optical density at 600 nm). ATc binds to TetR operon to induce CRISPRi. 0.8–1.0 OD600 equivalents of mycobacteria were harvested for total RNA isolation by TRIzol (Thermo Fisher). After removing the residual genomic DNA with DNase, RNA was reversely transcribed into cDNA (TAKARA) for quantitative real‐time PCR (qRT–PCR) using SYBR Green Supermix (Toyobo). The primers are sigA‐F: 5′‐tgatcgtgcgaaaaaccacc‐3′, sigA‐R: 5′‐aacttttcgaccgcacggat‐3′; MMAR_5356‐F: 5′‐gtttctggtgttggggcttt‐3′, MMAR_5356‐R: 5′‐ttggctcagcttgaacatcg‐3′; MMAR_5357‐F: 5′‐ggaggataggctcgggaatc‐3′, MMAR_5357‐R: 5′‐actggacgcaatcattacgc‐3′. Quantification Cycle Method (CT) was normalized to the housekeeping sigA transcript and quantified by the ΔΔCt method. All samples were three technical replicates.
FACS for analyzing interactions of galectin with bacteria
Bacteria including Mtb H37Rv, M. bovis BCG, M. smegmatis mc2155, wide‐type M. marinum, MMAR‐5356, and MMAR‐5357 knockdown M. marinum as well as E. coli DH5α at the order of 108 were fixed with 4% PFA for 30 min followed by incubation with indicated galectin protein for 30 min at RT. The bacteria were washed with PBS 3 times followed by incubation with anti‐galectin antibodies for 1 h at RT. Subsequently, the bacteria were further washed and incubated with APC‐anti‐rabbit antibodies for 30 min at RT. The washed bacteria were then analyzed by FACS analysis (BD accuri C6, BD). FlowJo 10.5.3 (Ashland, OR) was applied for the FACS data analysis.
System evolution of aptamers against AG by SELEX selection
Aptamers with an affinity for AG were selected by the SELEX method (Tuerk & Gold, 1990; Bock et al,
1992). The DNA library included a 35‐nucleotide random region as well as a 23‐nucleotide forward primer, which was identical to the 5′ flanking sequence of the library template (5ʹ‐GGGAGCTCAGAATAAACGCTCAA‐3ʹ), and a 20 nucleotide reverse primer, which was complementary to the 3′ flanking sequence of the library template (5ʹ‐GATCCGGGCCTCATGTCGAA‐3ʹ). The random single‐stranded DNA library and all primers were synthesized and purified by high‐performance liquid chromatography at the Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Services Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). ssDNA aptamers with high affinity against AG were screened as previously described (Qin et al,
2009; Qin et al,
2014; Aimaiti et al,
2015). 96‐well enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plates were coated with AG (in 0.1 M NaHCO3 buffer, pH 9.4) by overnight incubation at 4°C. Control wells were included by leaving wells uncoated (blank). The wells were then rinsed 4 times each with washing buffer (PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20, pH 7.4; PBST) and incubated for 1 h at RT with 200 μl of blocking buffer (PBS containing 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.05% Tween 20, pH 7.2). The ssDNA pools were denatured by heating at 94°C for 5 min in SHCMK‐binding buffer (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.35, 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, and 1 mM MgCl2) and then cooled to room temperature for 15 min. The ssDNA library was first added to control wells and incubated at 37°C, in order to screen out ssDNA‐targeting BSA. The unbound ssDNA was then removed and placed in the AG‐coated wells for incubation at 37°C. Unbound ssDNA sequences were removed by six rinses with washing buffer (SHCMK supplemented with 0.05% Tween 20; SHCMKT). Then, the AG‐bound ssDNA was recovered by incubation in elution buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, 4 M guanidinium isothiocyanate, and 1 mM DTT, pH 8.3) at 80°C for 10 min. The eluates were mixed with phenol‐chloroform and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 5 min at 4°C. The resulting supernatants were mixed with dehydrated alcohol and NaAc (3 M, pH 5.2) overnight at −20°C, and followed by centrifugation at 12,000g for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatants were discarded, and the pellets were resuspended in 75% alcohol and centrifuged for 10 min. The precipitate was then dissolved in 30 μL TE buffer (pH 8.0) and applied as the DNA library for the next round of screening.After 10 rounds of aptamer selection, PCR products from the last five rounds were purified using the TIANgel Midi Purification Kit (TIANgen Biotech Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) and cloned into a pMD18‐T vector by using a TA cloning kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). After transformation into E. coli DH5α cells and growth of the bacteria, random individual bacterial clones were picked from each of the five aptamer selection rounds for sequencing (Sangon, Shanghai, China). Individual aptamer sequence and secondary structure were identified using DNAMAN version 6.0 (Lynnon, Quebec, Canada).
Mouse challenge with AG
Female mice (6–8 weeks old) were divided randomly into cages upon arrival and were challenged by intraperitoneal or intravenous administration of AG. For intraperitoneal administration, indicated amounts of AG were directly injected into the peritoneum. For intravenous administration, indicated amounts of AG or AG water/oil/water (w/o/w) emulsion were injected intravenously. The w/o/w emulsion containing AG was prepared as described for the preparation of w/o/w emulsion containing trehalose‐6,6′‐dimycolate (TDM) in previous reports (Bekierkunst et al,
1969; Yarkoni & Rapp, 1977; Sakai et al,
2012). Briefly, 100 μg of chemically synthesized AG was dissolved in 3.2 μl of Freund’s incomplete adjuvant (Chemicon, Temecula, CA), and then, 3.2 μl of 0.1 M PBS was added. The mixture was then homogenized with a homogenizer. Finally, 93.6 μl of saline containing 0.2% Tween 20 were added to the homogenized w/o emulsion and homogenized again. The mice were injected intravenously with a 100 μl of w/o/w emulsion once at a 1‐week interval and were then sacrificed at 14 or 28 days post‐treatment for further analysis. To minimize the effects of subjective bias, blinding of the investigator was performed during group allocation and result analysis.
Zebrafish embryos infection with M. marinum
Wild‐type (AB) zebrafish embryos were infected via Duct of Cuvier injection. Each embryo was infected with 500 cfu of green fluorescent bacteria at 48 h post‐fertilization in the absence or presence of 2 ng aptamer(Takaki et al,
2013). Embryos were cultured in egg water containing AG aptamer (50 nM) in optical bottom 48‐well plates with a single embryo per well. The fish water was changed every 2 days, and the survival of embryos was monitored every day.
Mycobacterial infection of mice
The mouse infection experiments were performed as previously described (Bai et al,
2014; Liu et al,
2018a; Zheng et al,
2018a). For BCG or Mtb H37Rv infection, female C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks old) or Galectin‐9 KO mice were intranasally infected with 2 × 106 cfu Mycobacterium bovis BCG or Mtb H37Rv, with mycobacteria preincubated with 1 μg AG aptamer at 37°C for 40 min or with AG aptamer alone (Chen et al,
2007). AG aptamer was further administrated intranasally once at a 1‐week interval for 4 weeks. For mouse survival experiments, 6‐week‐old severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice were intranasally infected with 4 × 106 cfu Mtb H37Rv or with Mtb H37Rv preincubated with 1 μg AG aptamer at 37°C for 40 min. AG aptamer was further administrated intranasally once at a 1‐week interval for 12 weeks. The survival of mice was monitored once at a 1‐week interval. The Mtb infection experiments were performed in the Biosafety Level‐3 (BSL‐3) Laboratory. All mouse experiments were performed following the University Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Biological Research Ethics Committee of Tongji University.
Histological analysis
Lung tissues from Mtb‐infected or AG‐treated mice were fixed in 4% phosphate‐buffered formalin for 24 h and embedded in paraffin wax. The paraffin‐embedded lungs were cut into serial sections with a thickness of 2–3 μm. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was applied to detect the infiltration in the lungs. The stained slides were visualized by light microscopy and proceeded with CaseViewer version 2.0 which is a digital microscopy application designed for supporting the histopathological diagnostic workflow and the microscope examination process in bioscience (https://www.3dhistech.com/products‐and‐software/software/digital‐microscopes‐viewers/caseviewer‐old/, 3DHISTECH Ltd.).
CFU assay
Mtb H37Rv‐infected mice were killed at 4 weeks after infection. Lungs were collected and homogenized in 1 ml of PBS. Mycobacterial burden was determined by plating tenfold serial dilutions of each tissue homogenate on Middlebrook 7H10 agar plates. Colonies were counted after 3–4 weeks of incubation at 37°C.
Immunoblot analysis
The cell lysates were extracted using RIPA Lysis Buffer (Beyotime, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The protein sample lysate was separated using 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)‐polyacrylamide gel, transferred onto Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) membrane, and incubated with the appropriate antibodies.
Immunoprecipitation and GST precipitation
In brief, HEK293T cells were transiently transfected using Lipofectamine2000 (11668; Invitrogen), After 48 h, cells were washed with phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) and then lysed in cell‐lysis buffer for Western blotting and immunoprecipitation (Beyotime). Cellular debris was cleared by centrifugation at ~12,000 g for 15 min. For immunoprecipitation, cell lysates were incubated with anti‐Flag M2 Affinity Gel (A2220, Sigma‐Aldrich) and anti‐GFP agarose beads antibody (AE074, ABclonal) at 4°C overnight. For endogenous immunoprecipitation, primary peritoneal macrophages or THP‐1 cells were stimulated with AG for the indicated time periods. The cells were lysed, and the lysates were incubated with an anti‐TAK1 antibody and protein A/G (sepharose) at 4°C overnight. The sepharose samples were centrifuged, washed five times with cell‐lysis buffer, and denatured at 95°C with SDS loading buffer for 10 min. After separation by SDS–PAGE, equivalent amounts of protein were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes or polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked, incubated with primary antibodies at the indicated dilutions, and washed three times before incubation with secondary antibody. After a final wash, the analysis was conducted using an enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Immunoprecipitation and GST precipitation were also performed as previously described (Wang et al,
2020).
Confocal microscopy
Confocal microscopy was performed as described (Liu et al,
2018b).
Real‐time quantitative reverse‐transcription PCR
Total RNA was extracted with 1 ml of TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). Next, 1 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using the ReverTra Ace® qPCR RT Kit (Toyobo, FSQ‐101) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A SYBR RT‐PCR kit (Toyobo, QPK‐212) was used for quantitative real‐time RT–PCR analysis. The relative mRNA expression of different genes was calculated by comparison with the control gene Gapdh (encoding GAPDH) using the 2−△△Ct method. Gene expression was normalized to that of gapdh. Real‐time quantitative reverse‐transcription PCR (qRT–PCR) data were representative of at least 3 independent experiments, with 2 technical replicates per experiment. Primer sequences are listed in Appendix Table S1.
RNA‐seq analysis
Total RNA was isolated and used for RNA‐seq analysis. cDNA library construction and sequencing were performed by Beijing Genomics Institute using BGISEQ‐500 platform. High‐quality reads were aligned to the Mus musculus reference genome (UCSC_mm10) using Bowtie2. The expression levels for each of the genes were normalized to fragments per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads (FPKM) using RNA‐seq by Expectation Maximization (RSEM).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by two‐tailed Student’s t‐test or one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test or two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test or Mann–Whitney U‐test using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software). All data are expressed as mean + SD of the averages of technical replicates from the indicated number of independent experiments. Differences with values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The number "n" in the figure legends means how many independent experiments (biological replicates) are performed. The bars and error bars and the test are used to calculate P‐values in the respective figure legends.
Author contributions
Project conception, experiment design, and manuscript writing: HL, SHEK, X‐SY, and BG; Most of the experiments and data analysis: XW, RZ, and YW; Aptamer screening assay: LQ and DL; Gene knockdown M. marinum: LZ and JZ; Mouse survival experiment: LC and GZ; Zebrafish larvae survival experiment: BY, HY, and YW; Experiments and technical help: FT, FL, FW, LW, MM, ZL, JianC, XH, JW, RJ, PW, QS, WS, LL, AD, GP, YC, and PM‐A; Galectin‐9 knockout mice: JiayC and SG; Helpful comments: PZ, FR, and CC.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.AppendixClick here for additional data file.Expanded View Figures PDFClick here for additional data file.Source Data for Expanded ViewClick here for additional data file.Source Data for Figure 2Click here for additional data file.Source Data for Figure 3Click here for additional data file.Source Data for Figure 6Click here for additional data file.Source Data for Figure 7Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Kate E Killick; Clíona Ní Cheallaigh; Cliona O'Farrelly; Karsten Hokamp; David E MacHugh; James Harris Journal: Cell Microbiol Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 3.715
Authors: Diego J Laderach; Daniel Compagno; Marta A Toscano; Diego O Croci; Sebastián Dergan-Dylon; Mariana Salatino; Gabriel A Rabinovich Journal: IUBMB Life Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.885
Authors: Anna E Grzegorzewicz; Célia de Sousa-d'Auria; Michael R McNeil; Emilie Huc-Claustre; Victoria Jones; Cécile Petit; Shiva Kumar Angala; Júlia Zemanová; Qinglan Wang; Juan Manuel Belardinelli; Qian Gao; Yoshimasa Ishizaki; Katarína Mikušová; Patrick J Brennan; Donald R Ronning; Mohamed Chami; Christine Houssin; Mary Jackson Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 5.157