Global warming is the phenomenon of increasing average temperature on the planet,
which is emerging as a serious problem. According to a prediction, heat stress (HS)
caused by global warming will lead to financial losses in the U.S. pig industry
[1]. Heat waves cause tropical climate
expansion, and environmental changes in commercial farms will alter the nutritional
metabolism of pigs [2].Pigs are vulnerable to HS due to the absence of a functional sweat gland and a thick
layer of subcutaneous adipose tissue, which interferes with radiant heat loss [3,4].
Moreover, the severity of the HS damage to growing and finishing pigs is greater
than that of young pigs because of their different thermal neutral (TN) zones
according to body size [5]. Heat-stressed pigs
attempt to dissipate heat by circulating blood flow from their body core to the
periphery [5]. In this process, a decrease in
the blood flow in the gastrointestinal tract leads to hypoxia, which causes a
decrease in intestinal integrity and an increase in endotoxin permeability [6,7]. In
addition, voluntary feed intake of heat-stressed pigs was also decreased to promote
body heat loss by reducing heat production [8]. The shortage of nourishment induced by decreased feed intake and
alterations in the blood circulatory system leads to shifts in metabolism and
metabolite levels [2,9,10].Several studies have shown the possibility of using metabolites as a biomarker to
identify heat-stressed pigs using biological samples such as the blood and saliva of
growing and finishing pigs [10-12]. The saliva sample is a more ideal material
as a noninvasive and stress-free diagnostic tool in terms of the advantage of its
collection as well as animal welfare [13,14]. However, more information
about the effects of HS on salivary metabolites in pigs of a different gender is
needed to find the biomarkers for developing the diagnostic tool for HS. Hence, the
objectives of this study were to better understand sex-specific HS-mediated
metabolic changes and to investigate metabolites from saliva samples that are
related to HS, to evaluate them as potential biomarkers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals and experimental design
The present study was conducted following the ethical guidelines laid down by the
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institute of Animal
Science (No. NIAS-2017-245). A total of 6 growing pigs (Duroc; 3 boars and 3
gilts) of age 3 months, with an average body weight of 56 ± 2.62 kg were
used in this study. Animals were fed a diet based on corn and soybean meal, and
the diet was formulated to meet or exceed the nutritional requirements suggested
by the Korean feeding standard for swine [15] (Table 1). The pigs were
given free access to water and 2 kg of feed twice daily (09:00 and 16:00). Feed
and water intake were measured by a water meter (Daesung, Seoul, Korea) daily
during the experimental period and water loss was also collected to calculate
daily feed and water intake.
Table 1.
Ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental
diets
Item
Ratio (%)
Ingredients
Corn
55.80
Soybean meal (44%)
24.40
Wheat bran
9.00
Soybean hull
3.00
Molasses
3.00
Soybean oil
2.00
Limestone
1.10
L-lysine (78%)
0.40
DL-methionine (50%)
0.20
Tricalcium phosphate
0.40
Salt
0.40
Vitamin-mineral
premix[1)]
0.30
Calculated composition
Digestible energy
(kcal/kg)
3,450
Crude protein
18.00
Lysine
1.37
Methionine + Cysteine
0.70
Total phosphorus
0.50
Calcium
0.63
The values supplied per kilogram of premix feed concentrations: vit A
5,000,000 IU; vit D3 1,000,000 IU; vit E 1,000 mg; vit
B1 150 mg; vit B2 300 mg; vit
B12 1,500 mg; niacin amide 1,500 mg; DL-calcium
pantothenate 1,000 mg; folic acid 200 mg; vit H 10 mg; choline
chloride 2,000 mg; Mn 3,800 mg; Zn 1,500 mg; Fe 4,000 mg; Cu 500 mg;
I 250 mg; Co 100 mg; Mg 200 mg.
The values supplied per kilogram of premix feed concentrations: vit A
5,000,000 IU; vit D3 1,000,000 IU; vit E 1,000 mg; vit
B1 150 mg; vit B2 300 mg; vit
B12 1,500 mg; niacin amide 1,500 mg; DL-calcium
pantothenate 1,000 mg; folic acid 200 mg; vit H 10 mg; choline
chloride 2,000 mg; Mn 3,800 mg; Zn 1,500 mg; Fe 4,000 mg; Cu 500 mg;
I 250 mg; Co 100 mg; Mg 200 mg.The experiment was carried out in an environmental chamber equipped with controls
for temperature and humidity and animals were kept in individual metabolism
crates. The experimental temperature was determined by the temperature-humidity
index (THI) categories used as an indicator of HS [16]. The classifications of the index for HS are as
follows: Normal (THI < 23.33), Alert (23.33 ≤ THI < 26.11),
Danger (26.11 ≤ THI < 28.88), and Emergency (THI ≥ 28.88).
The THI was calculated based on the formula using temperature (T) and relative
humidity (RH) [17]:The pigs were kept at 25°C and 60% RH (Normal, THI = 22.69) for 5 days
during the adaptation period as a control group (TN), and saliva was collected
at the end of the adaptation period. After the adaptation period, the pigs were
kept at 30°C and 60% RH (Danger, THI = 26.59) for 24 h to demonstrate the
heat-stressed pig group (HS30), and at the end, saliva was collected for the
metabolomics analysis. After the first heat treatment, the pigs were allowed to
recover at 25°C and 60% RH for 5 days. After this break, the pigs were
kept at 33°C and 60% RH (Emergency, THI = 28.93) for 24 h to demonstrate
the higher heat-stressed pig group (HS33). Similarly, the saliva was collected
for metabolomic analysis at the end of the second heat treatment. The collection
of saliva samples was performed using a cotton swab fixed to the end of the rod
and pushed it into the pig’s mouth carefully. Thereafter, the swab was
taken out and placed into a tube (Sarstedt AG & Co., Numbrecht, Germany)
to collect the saliva samples after centrifugation (1,660×g at 4°C
for 15 min).
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
The saliva samples were used for 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
spectroscopy analysis; 150 μL of saliva sample was mixed with 5 μL
of deuterium oxide (D2O) containing 20 mM of sodium-3-trimethylsilyl
propionate-2,2,3,3-d4 (TSP; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)
and placed in 4-mm NMR nanotubes. NMR spectra for saliva samples were obtained
by high-resolution magic angle spinning (HR-MAS) NMR using an Agilent NMR
spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) with a 4 mm gHX
NanoProbe. The spinning rate was 2,050 Hz. A Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill pulse
sequence was used to remove signals generated by water and macromolecules in the
saliva samples. The1H-NMR spectra were measured with an acquisition
time of 1.704 s, 1 s of relaxation delay, and 10 min and 20 s of total
acquisition time. Chenomx NMR suite 7.1 (Chenoms, Edmonton, AB, Canada) software
was used for the assignment of spectra and quantification of metabolites. The
TSP-d4 peak (0.0 ppm) was used for calibrating the chemical
shifts as a reference.
Data processing and analyses
Multivariate statistical analysis was performed to calculate the amount of
metabolites in the samples. The spectra were binned into 0.001 ppm binning size
and the binned spectra were normalized to the total aliphatic spectral area and
aligned with the icoshift algorithm of MATLAB R2013b (Mathworks, Natick, MA,
USA). The data were imported into SIMCA (SIMCA version 14, Umetrics, Umea,
Sweden) software for additional analysis. Principal component analysis (PCA) and
orthogonal partial least square discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were performed
to visualize differences between experimental groups.
Statistical analysis
Variable importance in the projection (VIP) was obtained from the OPLS-DA model,
and VIP values > 1 were considered relevant for differences between
groups. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated between the
metabolites (VIP values > 1). Analyses of metabolites were performed
using Microsoft Excel. The statistical significance (p <
0.05) of the apparent difference in metabolite concentrations was evaluated by
one-way ANOVA (Prism 5.01, San Diego, CA, USA).
RESULTS
Principal component analysis
The distribution of all the saliva samples of boars and gilts was represented by
the PCA score plots (Fig. 1). The
separation from the TN to the HS33 group in boars was obvious (Fig. 1A). However, the PCA results did not
show a distinct separation between TN and HS30 (Fig. 1A). Additionally, the results of the PCA exhibited distinct
classification between the TN and HS33 groups in gilts (Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1.
Principal component analysis (PCA) based on the1H-nuclear
magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectra of porcine saliva from
boars (A) and gilts (B).
Individual samples for treatment are designated by the following symbols:
Thermal neutral (TN) group in green, heat stress (HS) condition
(30°C, 60% humidity) group in blue, and HS condition
(33°C, 60% humidity) group in red. All the saliva samples in the
score plots were within the 95% Hotelling T2 ellipse.
Principal component analysis (PCA) based on the1H-nuclear
magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectra of porcine saliva from
boars (A) and gilts (B).
Individual samples for treatment are designated by the following symbols:
Thermal neutral (TN) group in green, heat stress (HS) condition
(30°C, 60% humidity) group in blue, and HS condition
(33°C, 60% humidity) group in red. All the saliva samples in the
score plots were within the 95% Hotelling T2 ellipse.
Orthogonal supervised pattern recognition
The OPLS-DA plots of the saliva samples of boars and gilts showed a clear
separation between the TN and HS groups (Fig.
2). The parameters of the TN, HS30, and HS33 models for boar saliva
samples (R (cum) = 0.872,
R (cum) = 0.48, and
Q (cum) = 0.273) indicated that samples fit the
established discriminant mathematic model (Fig.
2A). Similarly, the parameters of the TN, HS30, and HS33 models for
gilts saliva samples (R (cum) = 0.808,
R (cum)= 0.889, and
Q (cum) = 0.643) displayed a distinct
separation among the three groups (Fig.
2B). The OPLS-DA models indicate that HS significantly affects the
salivary metabolic profiles of growing pigs.
Fig. 2.
Score scatter plot resulting from the orthogonal projection to latent
structures discriminant analyses (OPLS-DA) derived from
the1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectra
of porcine saliva from boars (A) and gilts (B).
Individual samples for treatment are designated by the following symbols:
Thermal neutral (TN) group in green, heat stress (HS) condition
(30°C, 60% humidity) group in blue, and HS condition
(33°C, 60% humidity) group in red. All the saliva samples in the
score plots were within the 95% Hotelling T2 ellipse.
Score scatter plot resulting from the orthogonal projection to latent
structures discriminant analyses (OPLS-DA) derived from
the1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectra
of porcine saliva from boars (A) and gilts (B).
Individual samples for treatment are designated by the following symbols:
Thermal neutral (TN) group in green, heat stress (HS) condition
(30°C, 60% humidity) group in blue, and HS condition
(33°C, 60% humidity) group in red. All the saliva samples in the
score plots were within the 95% Hotelling T2 ellipse.
Analysis of metabolites with significantly different levels
A total of sixteen and nine metabolites from the saliva samples of boars and
gilts were considered relevant for group discrimination (VIP values > 1)
and were identified in the TN and HS groups (Fig.
3). Among the sixteen metabolites with VIP values > 1 from the
saliva samples of boars between the TN and HS groups, the pigs reared under HS
conditions showed lower (p < 0.05) concentrations of
glutamate, leucine, phosphocholine, and creatine than the TN group (Fig. 4). The concentrations of alanine,
lactate, and glucose tended to decrease (p < 0.10), and
that of formate tended to increase (p < 0.10) in the HS
group compared to the TN group (Fig. 4). In
contrast, among the nine metabolites with VIP values of > 1 from the
saliva samples of gilts between the TN and HS groups, the concentrations of four
metabolites (glutamate, leucine, dimethylamine, and creatine phosphate) were
higher (p < 0.05) in the HS groups than in the TN group
(Fig. 5). There was a tendency
(p < 0.10) towards an increase in the concentrations
of acetone, valine, proline, and succinate between the TN and HS groups (Fig. 5).
Fig. 3.
Variable importance in the projection (VIP) plot of the porcine
saliva samples from boars (A) and gilts (B).
Variables with VIP values > 1 (red bars) were considered
responsible for group discrimination. Bars with VIP values below the
threshold of 1 are colored in green.
Fig. 4.
Average 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR)
spectroscopy concentration (μM) of identified metabolites
(variable importance in the projection value of > 1) with
significantly different levels in the saliva samples from boars: Thermal
neutral (TN) group, HS30 (heat stress [HS], 30°C, 60% humidity),
and HS33 (33°C, 60% humidity).
a–cMean values are significantly different
(p < 0.05).
Fig. 5.
Average 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR)
spectroscopy concentration (μM) of identified metabolites
(variable importance in the projection value of > 1) with
significantly different levels in the saliva samples from gilts: Thermal
neutral (TN) group, HS30 (heat stress [HS], 30°C, 60% humidity),
and HS33 (33°C, 60% humidity).
a,bMean values are significantly different (p
< 0.05).
Variable importance in the projection (VIP) plot of the porcine
saliva samples from boars (A) and gilts (B).
Variables with VIP values > 1 (red bars) were considered
responsible for group discrimination. Bars with VIP values below the
threshold of 1 are colored in green.
Average 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR)
spectroscopy concentration (μM) of identified metabolites
(variable importance in the projection value of > 1) with
significantly different levels in the saliva samples from boars: Thermal
neutral (TN) group, HS30 (heat stress [HS], 30°C, 60% humidity),
and HS33 (33°C, 60% humidity).
a–cMean values are significantly different
(p < 0.05).
Average 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR)
spectroscopy concentration (μM) of identified metabolites
(variable importance in the projection value of > 1) with
significantly different levels in the saliva samples from gilts: Thermal
neutral (TN) group, HS30 (heat stress [HS], 30°C, 60% humidity),
and HS33 (33°C, 60% humidity).
a,bMean values are significantly different (p
< 0.05).
Correlation analysis
Tables 2 and 3 indicate the correlation coefficients between the
metabolites in the saliva samples of boars and gilts, respectively. The values
range from 1.00 (perfect positive correlation) to −1.00 (perfect negative
correlation). In the case of boars, acetate concentration was negatively
correlated with propionate (p < 0.05). Alanine
concentration was negatively correlated with formate (p
< 0.05) and positively correlated with glucose and pimelate
(p < 0.01, p < 0.05).
Choline concentration was positively correlated with lactate and propionate
(p < 0.05,p < 0.05). There
was a positive correlation between citrate and isoleucine (p
< 0.05). Glucose and pimelate levels were inversely correlated with
formate (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01,
respectively). Both glutamate and pimelate were positively correlated with
glucose (p < 0.05), and valine concentration was
positively correlated with leucine and phosphocholine (p
< 0.05). In the case of gilts, there was a positive correlation between
creatine phosphate and leucine, glutamate and valine (p
< 0.05). Dimethylamine concentration was negatively correlated with
lactate levels (p < 0.01).
Table 2.
Pearson’s correlations of identified metabolites (variable
importance in the projection value of > 1) from saliva samples
for the boars
Acetate
Alanine
Choline
Citrate
Formate
Glucose
Glutamate
Isoleucine
Lactate
Leucine
Phosphocholine
Pimelate
Propionate
Trimethylamine N-oxide
Valine
Acetate
−0.88
−1.00 (p =
0.061)
−0.93
0.90
−0.88
−0.83
−0.94
−0.99
−0.99
−0.97
−0.90
−1.00[*]
−0.96
−0.98
Alanine
0.92
0.64
−1.00[*]
1.00[**]
1.00 (p =
0.06)
0.68
0.95
0.81
0.75
1.00[*]
0.90
0.98
0.77
Choline
0.89
−0.94
0.92
0.88
0.91
1.00[*]
0.97
0.95
0.94
1.00[*]
0.98
0.96
Citrate
−0.68
0.63
0.57
1.00[*]
0.85
0.97
0.99
0.68
0.91
0.79
0.98
Formate
−1.00[*]
−0.99
−0.71
−0.96
−0.83
−0.78
−1.00[**]
−0.92
−0.99
−0.80
Glucose
1.00[*]
0.67
0.94
0.80
0.74
1.00[*]
0.90
0.97
0.77
Glutamate
0.61
0.91
0.75
0.68
0.99
0.86
0.95
0.71
Isoleucine
0.88
0.98
0.99 (p =
0.064)
0.71
0.93
0.82
0.99
Lactate
0.95
0.92
0.96
0.99
0.99
0.94
Leucine
1.00 (p =
0.058)
0.83
0.98
0.91
1.00[*]
Phosphocholine
0.78
0.96
0.87
1.00[*]
Pimelate
0.92
0.99
0.80
Propionate
0.97
0.97
Trimethylamine N-oxide
0.89
Valine
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.
Table 3.
Pearson’s correlations of identified metabolites (variable
importance in the projection value of > 1) from saliva samples
for the gilts
Acetone
Creatine phosphate
Dimethylamine
Glutamate
Lactate
Leucine
Proline
Succinate
Valine
Acetone
0.84
−0.57
0.91
0.56
0.87
0.91
0.45
0.93
Creatine phosphate
−0.024
0.99
0.01
0.99[*]
0.54
−0.11
0.98
Dimethylamine
−0.18
−0.99[**]
−0.08
−0.86
−0.99 (p =
0.086)
−0.22
Glutamate
0.17
0.99 (p =
0.067)
0.67
0.05
0.99[*]
Lactate
0.07
0.85
0.99 (p =
0.078)
0.20
Leucine
0.58
−0.06
0.99 (p =
0.089)
Proline
0.78
0.69
Succinate
0.08
Valine
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.
p < 0.05,p < 0.01.p < 0.05,p < 0.01.
DISCUSSION
In the present study, NMR spectroscopy was used to quantify metabolites from porcine
saliva samples. NMR has the advantage of being able to precisely identify specific
liquid samples such as serum and urine [14].
It has been reported that the NMR analysis of saliva and urine from gilts could be
used for the identification of puberty using potential biomarkers [18]. However, metabolic materials from the
urine are primarily affected by food and the environment, resulting in heterogeneity
compared with salivary metabolites, which are more homogenous [19]. Therefore, the use of salivary metabolites as a biomarker
instead of any other biofluid (e.g., plasma, serum, and urine) can be a suitable
method to manage heat-stressed pigs. The management of environmental conditions for
pigs is important for better growth performance. In particular, optimal ambient
temperature is necessary for the maintenance of normal body conditions, and the
ideal TN zone for growing pigs is below 25°C [20]. In the present study, growing pigs in the TN group were raised at
25°C and those in the HS33 group resulted in a decrease in daily feed intake
and a tendency to increase in daily water intake (our published data) [21]. Reduced feed intake and loss of appetite
minimize metabolic heat production. Moreover, reduction in body weight occurs in
acute heat-stressed pigs 24 h after heat treatment; they undergo catabolic
metabolism and dehydration, resulting in reduced feed efficiency, fat deposition,
and protein degradation [2,6,22].Acute HS primarily leads to a temporary nutrient restriction to minimize metabolic
heat production, an alteration in intestinal function, and an increase in intestinal
permeability caused by vasoconstriction in the gastrointestinal tract [7,23].
Moreover, these symptoms cause an increase in glucose absorption by upregulation of
glucose-related transporters to preferentially protect the intestinal epithelial
cells (IECs) [24]. The absorbed glucose is
used for the generation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) as an energy source for IEC
protection [25]. In the literature,
continuous feed and energy depletion by HS, resulting in negative energy balance
(NEB) due to insufficient fuel for energy supply [12]. In the NEB state, protein catabolism is increased, meaning that an
alternative energy fuel is needed [26].
Furthermore, Lu et al. [22] reported that
chronic HS decreased the proportion of chicken breast meat and increased leg meat
for energy production. It seems that breast meat is affected owing to its relatively
higher protein rate than leg meat.It has been shown that differently gendered pigs have a different mechanism under
acute HS due to the conflicting results of several metabolites, and a schematic
overview of some changed metabolic pathways is shown (Fig. 6A). It has also been reported that the gender of pigs might affect
the HS response [27,28]. In the present study, the glutamate and leucine levels in
the saliva samples from the male pigs decreased and the concentrations of glucose
and alanine tended to decrease by HS. It may be speculated that the NEB state
occurred. However, the glutamate and leucine levels in the saliva samples from the
female pigs increased and the concentration of valine tended to be higher in HS33
than TN. Even though the TN zone depends on body size, the pigs used in our study
had similar body weights [5]. Therefore, the
contrasting result of the metabolites associated with the tricarboxylic acid cycle
could be ascribed to a gender effect because uncastrated pigs (boar) were used in
this study. It was reported that an increase in cortisol and protein catabolism for
glucose production are consequence of nutrient depletion by releasing
glucocorticoids from the adrenal cortex [29].
This hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is activated under stressful
conditions; however, female sex hormones could attenuate the stress response and
slow down the cortisol feedback by reducing the reactivity of the HPA axis [30]. Moreover, different body compositions
(lean meat and subcutaneous fat) according to sex may also affect the heat response.
Boars generally have a thicker subcutaneous fat layer than gilts [31-33]. However, the thick subcutaneous fat layer, which has an insulation
effect, disturbs radiant heat loss for heat dissipation [4,34]. These sex-specific
differences in the hormonal mechanism and body composition could alter the HS
response of male and female pigs. In other words, it appears that the NEB triggered
by the HS was less severe in the female pigs compared to the male pigs, which would
lead to contrasting results for the concentrations of glutamate and leucine.
Fig. 6.
Schematic overview of important metabolites (variable importance in the
projection value > 1) and metabolic pathways related to amino acids,
energy (A), and protein metabolism (B) in heat-stressed pigs.
Blue arrows: heat stress (HS) group vs. thermal neutral (TN) group in boars.
Red arrows: HS group vs. TN group in gilts. a–cMean values
are significantly different (p < 0.05). TCA,
tricarboxylic acid; CoA, coenzyme A; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; ADP,
adenosine diphosphate.
Schematic overview of important metabolites (variable importance in the
projection value > 1) and metabolic pathways related to amino acids,
energy (A), and protein metabolism (B) in heat-stressed pigs.
Blue arrows: heat stress (HS) group vs. thermal neutral (TN) group in boars.
Red arrows: HS group vs. TN group in gilts. a–cMean values
are significantly different (p < 0.05). TCA,
tricarboxylic acid; CoA, coenzyme A; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; ADP,
adenosine diphosphate.Acute HS also changed the metabolites related to protein metabolism in all gender;
besides, a muscular reaction by the HS was an inevitable event for male and female
pigs. The decreased feed intake and increased energy expenditure cause weight loss
by the NEB, resulting in muscle damage [35,36]. A schematic
representation of some changed metabolic pathways is shown in Fig. 6B. In the present study, creatine was decreased in male
pigs, whereas creatine phosphate was increased in female pigs. Even though the
results of these metabolites were found in different sexes, it appears that
creatine, which can attenuate the damage and enhance muscle gain, was converted to
creatine phosphate to protect from protein degradation in muscle using ATP and
creatine phosphokinase [37,38]. However, chronic HS increased the creatine
level by mobilization of creatine phosphate in the muscle tissue for energy supply
by nutrient depletion [39,40]. Additionally, elevated levels of creatine
phosphokinase were induced by a decrease in phosphocholine level, cholinedeficiency, and muscle damage [37,41]. Moreover, cholinedeficiency may have
contributed to the difference in dimethylamine (DMA), which is formed from
trimethylamine (TMA) and choline in female pigs [42,43]. It has been reported that
dietary choline increased TMA and DMA in rats, and a choline-free diet also
increased the excretion of TMA and DMA due to persistent excretion of methylamine in
some rat tissues [42-44]. However, further research using the pig
model is needed to elucidate the observed significant difference in the DMA in
female pigs by the HS.Concentrations of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) such as acetate, propionate, and
butyrate are related to reduced feed intake by HS. Especially, Bedford et al. [45] reported that the absorption and production
of the VFAs are associated with controlling both satiety and hunger. In the present
study, it can be speculated that reduced feed intake by HS decreased production and
increased absorption of both acetate and propionate. Because it was previously
reported that infusion of propionate decreased feed intake by affecting satiety
[46]. There was also a result of
interconversion between acetate and propionate by the HS [45]. However, in the result of correlations of identified
metabolites in pigs, there was a negative correlation between the concentrations of
acetate and propionate. This result might be due to the conversion of propionate to
acetate by decreased feed intake under HS condition was stronger than that of
acetate to propionate [45].In conclusion, HS induced alterations in several metabolites, and the response to HS
showed different metabolic changes caused by the gender effect. The reason for this
is not clear; however, sex-specific characteristics, such as different-sex hormonal
mechanisms and body composition, may lead to different results of the metabolites in
this study. Besides, in an effort to protect muscle damage from acute HS, alteration
in protein-related metabolites is required for regulatory adaptation to acute HS.
However, further research is necessary to elucidate the effect of sex differences on
the response to HS. It is anticipated that this study will facilitate the
development of a diagnostic tool to manage heat-stressed pigs.
Authors: Kerry-Ann da Costa; Mihai D Niculescu; Corneliu N Craciunescu; Leslie M Fischer; Steven H Zeisel Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: B Zumbach; I Misztal; S Tsuruta; J P Sanchez; M Azain; W Herring; J Holl; T Long; M Culbertson Journal: J Anim Sci Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 3.159
Authors: S C Pearce; V Mani; R L Boddicker; J S Johnson; T E Weber; J W Ross; L H Baumgard; N K Gabler Journal: J Anim Sci Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.159
Authors: Sarah C Pearce; Venkatesh Mani; Rebecca L Boddicker; Jay S Johnson; Thomas E Weber; Jason W Ross; Robert P Rhoads; Lance H Baumgard; Nicholas K Gabler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.240