| Literature DB >> 33987601 |
Ayele Mandefro1, Tesfaye Sisay2, Zewdu Edea3, Md Rasel Uzzaman3, Kwan-Suk Kim3, Hailu Dadi4.
Abstract
Attributable to their major function in pathogen recognition, the use of bovine leukocyte antigens (BoLA) as disease markers in immunological traits in cattle is well established. However, limited report exists on polymorphism of the BoLA gene in zebu cattle breeds by high resolution typing methods. Thus, we used a polymerase chain reaction sequence-based typing (PCR-SBT) method to sequence exon 2 of the BoLA class II DRB3 gene from 100 animals (Boran, n = 13; Sheko, n = 20; Fogera, n = 16; Horro, n = 19), Hanwoo cattle (n = 18) and Bangladesh Red Chittagong zebu (n = 14). Out of the 59 detected alleles, 43 were already deposited under the Immuno Polymorphism Database for major histocompatibility complex (IPD-MHC) while 16 were unique to this study. Assessment of the level of genetic variability at the population and sequence levels with genetic distance in the breeds considered in this study showed that Zebu breeds had a gene diversity score greater than 0.752, nucleotide diversity score greater than 0.152, and mean number of pairwise differences higher than 14, being very comparable to those investigated for other cattle breeds. Regarding neutrality tests analyzed, we investigated that all the breeds except Hanwoo had an excess number of alleles and could be expected from a recent population expansion or genetic hitchhiking. Howbeit, the observed heterozygosity was not significantly (p < 0.05) higher than the expected heterozygosity. The Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) analysis revealed non-significant excess of heterozygote animals, indicative of plausible over-dominant selection. The pairwise FST values suggested a low genetic variation among all the breeds (FST = 0.056; p < 0.05), besides the rooting from the evolutionary or domestication history of the cattle. No detached clade was observed in the evolutionary divergence study of the BoLA-DRB3 gene, inferred from the phylogenetic tree based on the maximum likelihood model. The investigation herein indicated the clear differences in BoLA-DRB3 gene variability between African and Asian cattle breeds. © Copyright 2021 Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology.Entities:
Keywords: Alleles; BoLA-DRB3; Cattle breeds; Genetic diversity; Sequence based typing (SBT)
Year: 2021 PMID: 33987601 PMCID: PMC8071750 DOI: 10.5187/jast.2021.e37
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Technol ISSN: 2055-0391
Detail descriptions of the sampled cattle breeds
| Acronym | Sample size | Number of farms | Breed | Type | Country of origin | Sampling country |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RC | 14 | Randomly collected | Red Chittagong | Zebu | Bangladesh | |
| BO | 13 | 1 | Boran | Zebu | Ethiopia | |
| FO | 16 | 1 | Fogera | Zebu | Ethiopia | Ethiopia |
| HN | 18 | Randomly collected | Hanwoo | Zebu × Taurine | Korea | Korea |
| HO | 19 | Randomly collected | Horro | Zebu | Ethiopia | Ethiopia |
| SH | 20 | Randomly collected | Sheko | Zebu × Taurine | Ethiopia | Ethiopia |
Comparison of the allele distributions and frequencies of BoLA-DRB3.2 sequences among considered breeds
| Alleles | RC | BO | FO | HN | HO | SH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BoLA-DRB3[ | 0.071 | 0.077 | - | - | 0.053 | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | 0.071 | - | - | - | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | 0.071 | - | - | - | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | 0.286 | - | - | - | - | 0.050 |
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| BoLA-DRB3[ | 0.071 | - | - | - | - | 0.050 |
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| BoLA-DRB3[ | 0.071 | - | - | - | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | 0.077 | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | 0.077 | - | - | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | 0.077 | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | 0.077 | - | 0.056 | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | 0.077 | 0.063 | - | 0.158 | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | 0.077 | - | - | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | 0.077 | - | 0.056 | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | 0.188 | - | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | 0.062 | 0.111 | 0.053 | 0.150 |
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | 0.062 | - | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | 0.062 | - | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | 0.062 | - | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | 0.062 | 0.056 | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | 0.062 | - | 0.053 | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | 0.062 | - | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | 0.062 | - | - | 0.050 |
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | 0.062 | - | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | 0.062 | - | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | 0.111 | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | 0.444 | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | 0.056 | - | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | 0.056 | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | 0.105 | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | 0.105 | 0.100 |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | 0.105 | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | 0.053 | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | 0.053 | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | 0.053 | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | 0.053 | 0.100 |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | 0.053 | - |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | 0.053 | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | - | 0.050 |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | - | 0.050 |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | - | 0.050 |
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | ||
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | - | 0.050 |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | - | 0.050 |
| BoLA-DRB3[ | - | - | - | - | - | 0.050 |
| - | - | - | - | - |
Alleles written in bold indicated that the new alleles identified in the current study and not reported in IPD-MCH database.
BoLA, bovine leukocyte antigens; RC, Red Chittagong; Bo, Boran; Fo, Fogera; HN, Korean Hanwoo; HO, Horro; SH, Sheko; IPD-MHC, Immuno Polymorphism Database for major histocompatibility complex.
Fig. 1.The nucleotide sequences of the newly identified alleles were compared with the reference sequence from the IPD-MHC data base (BoLA-DRB3*106:01) and higher variability of the region was visualized.
IPD-MHCI, mmuno Polymorphism Database for major histocompatibility complex; BoLA, bovine leukocyte antigens.
Fig. 2.The nucleotide identity of the new alleles identified from this study compared to the reference sequence from IPD-MHC data base showed 88%–100% similarity.
IPD-MHCI, Immuno Polymorphism Database for major histocompatibility complex.
DNA polymorphism of BoLA-DRB3.2, nucleotide diversity (π), mean number of nucleotide differences (NPD), number of polymorphic sites (S), haplotype number (H), haplotype diversity (Hd), average haplotype count (AHC), synonymous (SS) and non-synonymous (NSS) substitutions with estimated ratios for considered breeds
| Breeds | NPD | S | H | Hd | AHC | SS | NSS | NSs/Ss ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RC | 0.063 | 16.186 | 53 | 11 | 0.934 | 0.714 | 13 | 24 | 1.850 |
| BO | 0.072 | 18.307 | 54 | 12 | 0.987 | 0.846 | 11 | 27 | 2.450 |
| FO | 0.068 | 17.292 | 53 | 13 | 0.966 | 0.625 | 13 | 21 | 1.610 |
| HN | 0.056 | 14.339 | 47 | 8 | 0.751 | 0.500 | 16 | 24 | 1.500 |
| HO | 0.064 | 16.380 | 58 | 14 | 0.964 | 0.736 | 11 | 23 | 2.090 |
| SH | 0.065 | 16.631 | 65 | 18 | 0.989 | 0.800 | 10 | 33 | 3.300 |
BoLA, bovine leukocyte antigens; RC, Red Chittagong; Bo, Boran; Fo, Fogera; HN, Korean Hanwoo; HO, Horro; SH, Sheko.
Number of sequences (N), number of alleles (Na), observed (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) and Fu’s Fs and Tajima’s D neutrality test statistics and Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in terms of FIS coefficient
| Breed | N | Na | Ho | He | FIS- | Fu’s Fs | Fs | Tajima’s D | Tajima’s
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RC | 14 | 11 | 0.920 | 0.923 | 0.082 | −0.116 | 0.439 | −0.126 | 0.458 |
| BO | 13 | 12 | 0.980 | 0.987 | 0.053 | −1.699 | 0.164 | 0.233 | 0.630 |
| FO | 16 | 13 | 0.750 | 0.975 | 0.066 | −0.841 | 0.318 | 0.350 | 0.695 |
| HN | 18 | 8 | 0.800 | 0.804 | 0.081 | 4.594 | 0.959 | 0.203 | 0.612 |
| HO | 19 | 14 | 0.960 | 0.965 | 0.055 | −0.478 | 0.424 | −0.052 | 0.516 |
| SH | 20 | 18 | 0.970 | 0.979 | 0.055 | −4.219 | 0.052 | −0.374 | 0.376 |
RC, Red Chittagong; Bo, Boran; Fo, Fogera; HN, Korean Hanwoo; HO, Horro; SH, Sheko.
Genetic distances between pairs of populations based on Wright’s F-statistics FST below the diagonal and Nei’s genetic distance GST above the diagonal estimated.
| Breed | HF | RC | BO | FO | HN | HO | SH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HF | - | 0.019 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.050 | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| RC | 0.029 | - | 0.017 | 0.023 | 0.086 | 0.024 | 0.110 |
| BO | 0.012 | 0.015 | - | 0.007 | 0.064 | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| FO | 0.036 | 0.020 | 0.020 | - | 0.074 | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| HN | 0.084 | 0.137 | 0.092 | 0.151 | - | 0.074 | 0.067 |
| HO | 0.029 | 0.019 | 0.005 | 0.036 | 0.164 | - | 0.008 |
| SH | 0.029 | 0.007 | −0.003 | −0.015 | 0.164 | 0.001 | - |
HF, Holstein-Friesian; RC, Red Chittagong; Bo, Boran; Fo, Fogera; HN, Korean Hanwoo; HO, Horro; SH, Sheko.
Fig. 3.Representation of calculated FST values between pairs of populations graph generated by R-function: pair FST matrix.r.
RC, Bangladesh Red Chittagong; BO, Boran; FO, Fogera; HN, Hanwoo; HO, Horro; SH, Sheko; BT, Bos taurus.
Fig. 4.Phylogenetic Tree.
B = Bangladesh Red Chittagong; Br, Boran; F, Fogera; Hn, Hanwoo; H, Horro; S, Sheko; BT, Bos taurus.