| Literature DB >> 33986604 |
Yifang Li1, Yanzhen Chen1, Xing Tian1, Shanshan Zhang1, Jian Jiao1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), previously thought to predominantly affect obese individuals, has also been shown to occur in subjects who have a relatively normal body mass index (BMI). Due to the normal BMI, non-obese NAFLD are easily to be ignored and eventually lead to potential liver injuries.Entities:
Keywords: characteristic; gender; non-alcoholic liver disease; non-obese; obese
Year: 2021 PMID: 33986604 PMCID: PMC8110261 DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S304634
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ISSN: 1178-7007 Impact factor: 3.168
Main Characteristics of 1608 Cases Undergoing Routine Physical Examination
| Clinical Indicators | Non-Obese (n=974) | Obese (n=634) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 50.39±11.57 | 47.21±10.86 | 0.01 |
| Sex (male/female) | 59/42 | 297/98 | 0.03 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.61±1.36 | 28.53±2.64 | 0.01 |
| E (kPa) | 6.67±1.65 | 7.96±4.13 | 0.00 |
| CAP (db/m) | 263.21±21.49 | 267.35±24.94 | 0.00 |
| AST (IU/L) | 28.65±12.27 | 28.85±12.3 | 0.30 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 37.06±28.18 | 36.80±24.45 | 0.01 |
| ALP (IU/L) | 90.40±22.96 | 89.15±23.22 | 0.20 |
| GGT (IU/L) | 46.28±27.52 | 52.32±61.52 | 0.03 |
| ALB (g/L) | 46.84±3.31 | 46.51±2.55 | 0.50 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.20±1.83 | 2.66±2.52 | 0.01 |
| CHOL (mmol/L) | 5.19±0.85 | 5.35±1.06 | 0.02 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.14±0.24 | 1.12±0.24 | 0.03 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.47±0.70 | 3.59±0.83 | 0.02 |
| Blood glucose (mmol/L) | 5.79±1.35 | 6.25±2.14 | 0.04 |
Note: All measurement data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 1Patients and study design. 1608 cases were divided into obese group (BMI≧27.5 kg/m2) and non-obese group (BMI < 27.5 kg/m2).Constituent ratio of NAFLD in obese and non-obese population and its relationship with clinical indicators were compared. Risk factors of non-obese NALFD were analyzed.
Main Characteristics of NAFLD Group and Non-NAFLD Group in Non-Obese Population
| Clinical Indicators | NAFLD (n=101) | Non-NAFLD (n=873) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 50.13±11.83 | 45.73±11.26 | 0.05 |
| Sex (male/female) | 59/42 | 355/518 | 0.01 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.26±2.45 | 21.86±2.16 | 0.00 |
| ALP (IU/L) | 90.70±27.39 | 79.55±24.92 | 0.00 |
| GGT (IU/L) | 41.19±33.45 | 27.80±39.23 | 0.00 |
| ALB (g/L) | 46.46±3.01 | 46.19±3.01 | 0.41 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.13±1.63 | 1.41±1.12 | 0.00 |
| CHOL (mmol/L) | 5.32±1.10 | 5.02±0.97 | 0.00 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.21±0.26 | 1.33±0.27 | 0.00 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.50±0.83 | 3.14±0.83 | 0.00 |
| Blood glucose (mmol/L) | 5.69±1.19 | 5.31±0.98 | 0.00 |
Note: All measurement data are expressed as mean±standard deviation.
Figure 2Gender distribution of occurrence of NAFLD in non-obese and obese population. Occurrence of NAFLD was higher in obese group than in non-obese group (p<0.001). There was a statistical difference in the occurrence of NAFLD between male and female in non-obese group (p=0.001), no statistical difference was found in obese group (p=0.934).
Figure 3Age distribution of NAFLD in non-obese and obese population.
Figure 4Distribution of TG levels in non-obese and obese population.
Figure 5CHOL levels and occurrence of NAFLD in non-obese and obese population. No statistical difference found in the distribution of CHOL levels between obese and non-obese population (p>0.05).
Figure 6Constituent ratio of different blood glucose levels in non-obese and obese population.
Results of Regression Analysis of NAFLD in Non-Obese NAFLD Patients
| Clinical Parameters | p | OR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.480 | 1.001 | 0.998–1.004 |
| Sex | 0.360 | 1.249 | 0.776–2.012 |
| BMI | 0.000* | 1.311 | 0.130–1.520 |
| ALP | 0.241 | 1.584 | 0.734–3.416 |
| GGT | 0.563 | 1.222 | 0.619–2.411 |
| TG | 0.000* | 2.545 | 1.552–4.172 |
| CHOL | 0.660 | 0.836 | 0.376–1.858 |
| LDL-C | 0.675 | 1.209 | 0.498–2.931 |
| Blood glucose | 0.426 | 1.294 | 0.686–2.439 |
Note: *p<0.05.