Literature DB >> 33986221

Utility of the Current Procedural Terminology Codes for Prophylactic Stabilization for Defining Metastatic Femur Disease.

Sarah M Hanna1, Duncan C Ramsey, Yee C Doung, James B Hayden, Reid F Thompson, Andrew R Summers, Kenneth R Gundle.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cohorts from the electronic health record are often defined by the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. The error prevalence of CPT codes for patients receiving surgical treatment of metastatic disease of the femur has not been investigated, and the predictive value of coding ontologies to identify patients with metastatic disease of the femur has not been adequately discussed.
METHODS: All surgical cases at a single academic tertiary institution from 2010 through 2015 involving prophylactic stabilization of the femur or fixation of a pathologic fracture of the femur were identified using the CPT and International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes. A detailed chart review was conducted to determine the procedure performed as documented in the surgical note and the patient diagnosis as documented in the pathology report, surgical note, and/or office visit notes.
RESULTS: We identified 7 CPT code errors of 171 prophylactic operations (4.1%) and one error of 71 pathologic fracture fixation s(1.4%). Of the 164 prophylactic operations that were coded correctly, 87 (53.0%) had metastatic disease. Of the 70 pathologic operations that were coded correctly, 41 (58%) had metastatic disease. DISCUSSION: The error prevalence was low in both prophylactic stabilization and pathologic fixation groups (4.1% and 1%, respectively). The structured data (CPT and ICD-9 codes) had a positive predictive value for patients having metastatic disease of 53% for patients in the prophylactic stabilization group and 58% for patients in the pathologic fixation group. The CPT codes and ICD codes assessed in this analysis do provide a useful tool for defining a population in which a moderate proportion of individuals have metastatic disease in the femur at an academic medical center. However, verification is necessary.
Copyright © 2020 Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33986221      PMCID: PMC7752682          DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev        ISSN: 2474-7661


  24 in total

1.  What Factors Are Associated With Implant Breakage and Revision After Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Metastases?

Authors:  Julie J Willeumier; Mustafa Kaynak; Peer van der Zwaal; Sven A G Meylaerts; Nina M C Mathijssen; Paul C Jutte; Panagiotis Tsagozis; Rikard Wedin; Michiel A J van de Sande; Marta Fiocco; P D Sander Dijkstra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Detecting the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter and urinary symptoms in hospitalized patients using natural language processing.

Authors:  Adi V Gundlapalli; Guy Divita; Andrew Redd; Marjorie E Carter; Danette Ko; Michael Rubin; Matthew Samore; Judith Strymish; Sarah Krein; Kalpana Gupta; Anne Sales; Barbara W Trautner
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Intramedullary nailing for treatment of pathologic femoral fractures due to metastases.

Authors:  Andrea Piccioli; Barbara Rossi; Laura Scaramuzzo; Maria Silvia Spinelli; Zuozhang Yang; Giulio Maccauro
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 4.  Research Methods in Healthcare Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Stewardship: Use of Administrative and Surveillance Databases.

Authors:  Marci Drees; Jeffrey S Gerber; Daniel J Morgan; Grace M Lee
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Identification of urinary tract infections using electronic health record data.

Authors:  Kathryn L Colborn; Michael Bronsert; Karl Hammermeister; William G Henderson; Abhinav B Singh; Robert A Meguid
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Is Prophylactic Intervention More Cost-effective Than the Treatment of Pathologic Fractures in Metastatic Bone Disease?

Authors:  Alan T Blank; Daniel M Lerman; Neeraj M Patel; Timothy B Rapp
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Is a Cephalomedullary Nail Durable Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Peritrochanteric Disease?

Authors:  David H Chafey; Valerae O Lewis; Robert L Satcher; Bryan S Moon; Patrick P Lin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Is There an Association Between Prophylactic Femur Stabilization and Survival in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease?

Authors:  Travis C Philipp; Jacob D Mikula; Yee-Cheen Doung; Kenneth R Gundle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Unbiased identification of patients with disorders of sex development.

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Melissa Gardner; David E Sandberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Prediction of survival after surgical management of femoral metastatic bone disease - A comparison of prognostic models.

Authors:  Charles Meares; Alexander Badran; David Dewar
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.072

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.