Literature DB >> 24119652

Intramedullary nailing for treatment of pathologic femoral fractures due to metastases.

Andrea Piccioli1, Barbara Rossi2, Laura Scaramuzzo3, Maria Silvia Spinelli4, Zuozhang Yang5, Giulio Maccauro4.   

Abstract

Pathologic fractures of the femur because of bone metastases seriously affect the quality of life of cancer patients. Different surgical options are indicated to achieve a durable and solid fixation, depending on several clinical, prognostic and mechanical factors. Locked intramedullary nailing is currently used to treat pathologic femoral fractures in patients with multiple metastases when the trochanteric region or shaft is mainly involved. This study evaluates intramedullary nailing for treatment of patients with pathologic femoral fractures, focussing on complications, clinical and functional outcomes and survival rates. The series included 80 pathologic fractures treated with a titanium alloy Proximal Nail (Standard or Antirotation) or Lateral Anterograde Femoral Nail (PFN, PFNA or LAFN, Synthes) inserted in a locked static mode. Acrylic cement was used to fill the bone cavity after nail insertion in eight patients; percutaneous cementoplasty was simultaneously performed in 11 cases of severe ipsilateral acetabular osteolysis. Postoperative outcomes focussed on pain relief, postoperative mobility and quality of life and they were analysed retrospectively using QOL-ACD and ECOG. Eleven patients (13.75%) suffered from non-fatal DVT post-surgery, with no pulmonary embolism. Six patients (7.5%) developed superficial wound infections and two patients (2.5%) developed pnaeumonia. There was no loss of reduction, breakage, screw pull out, or hardware or implant failure that required component substitution or revision. Lung histotype and the contemporary presence of cerebral and visceral metastases appeared to be predisposing factors in reducing survival time. All patients attained satisfactory pain relief, early deambulation and a marked clinical improvement during the first 6-10 postoperative months, with gradual worsening thereafter from deterioration of their general condition due to cancer progression. The patients' survival rate was 40% at 1 year, 25% at 2 years and 15% at 3 years. Results confirm that multiple factors related to patients and primary cancer may affect survival rate after femoral fracture. Intramedullary nailing should be indicated for pathologic fractures at femoral diaphysis and metaphysis when cancer is in an advanced stage. This procedure offers good and durable stability, and enables pain relief, early postoperative mobilisation and weight-bearing, thus improving the quality of life of cancer patients.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femur; Intramedullary nailing; Metastases; Pathologic fractures; Prognostic factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24119652     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  27 in total

1.  What Factors Are Associated With Implant Breakage and Revision After Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Metastases?

Authors:  Julie J Willeumier; Mustafa Kaynak; Peer van der Zwaal; Sven A G Meylaerts; Nina M C Mathijssen; Paul C Jutte; Panagiotis Tsagozis; Rikard Wedin; Michiel A J van de Sande; Marta Fiocco; P D Sander Dijkstra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Prophylactic augmentation of the osteoporotic proximal femur-mission impossible?

Authors:  Peter Varga; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; Michael Blauth; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-12-07

3.  Is It Appropriate to Treat Sarcoma Metastases With Intramedullary Nailing?

Authors:  Bryan S Moon; Dwayne J Dunbar; Patrick P Lin; Robert L Satcher; Justin E Bird; Valerae O Lewis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Intramedullary Nailing Combined with Bone Grafting for Benign Lesions of the Proximal Femur.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Jia-Zhen Li; Xin-Chang Lu; Yi Zhang; Huai-Shuan Zhang; Hai-Long Shi; Zheng Lei; Guang Feng; Wei-Ping Fu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Clinical and functional comparison of dynamic hip screws and intramedullary nails for treating proximal femur metastases in older individuals.

Authors:  Hua Gao; Xiaodong Bai; Wentao Chen; Yadong Li; Liang Zhao; Changgui Liu; Zhenyu Liu; Baojun Wang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  What Factors Are Associated With Local Metastatic Lesion Progression After Intramedullary Nail Stabilization?

Authors:  Punthitra Arpornsuksant; Carol D Morris; Jonathan A Forsberg; Adam S Levin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  CORR Insights®: What Factors Are Associated With Local Metastatic Lesion Progression after Intramedullary Nail Stabilization?

Authors:  Robert L Satcher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Is a Cephalomedullary Nail Durable Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Peritrochanteric Disease?

Authors:  David H Chafey; Valerae O Lewis; Robert L Satcher; Bryan S Moon; Patrick P Lin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Surgical Approach to Bone Metastases.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Siegel; J Sybil Biermann; Anda-Alexandra Calinescu; Daniel E Spratt; Nicholas J Szerlip
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 10.  Bone metastases of unknown origin: epidemiology and principles of management.

Authors:  Andrea Piccioli; Giulio Maccauro; Maria Silvia Spinelli; Roberto Biagini; Barbara Rossi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.