| Literature DB >> 33984891 |
Gökhan Akkurt1, Bahar Kartal2, Mustafa Alimoğulları3, Sevil Çaylı2, Ebru Alimoğulları2.
Abstract
Background/aim: We aimed to investigate whether there was a significant difference in TSH, T3, T4 values and histopathologically evaluated thyroid tissues between rats that received ısole hydrolyzed whey protein (IHWP) at different doses regularly and rats fed with only standard feed. Material & methods: Total 24 rats were randomly divided into three groups with 8 rats in each group. First group were fed with standard feed for 12 weeks. Second group were given standard feed + daily 0.3 g/kg IHWP and rats in the third group standard feed + 0.5 g/kg IHWP for 12 weeks. Blood samples were collected from all rats before and after IHWP administration. All rats were then sacrificed, and thyroid tissues were histopathologically examined.Entities:
Keywords: Isole hydrolyzed whey protein; hyperthyroidism; thyroid function; hypothyroidism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33984891 PMCID: PMC8569766 DOI: 10.3906/sag-2010-270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Turk J Med Sci ISSN: 1300-0144 Impact factor: 0.973
Thyroid hormone difference between the groups.
| Mean ± sd | Median (25–75) | Test | p | Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSH (0.35– 4.90) | Control | 4.08 ± 0.43 | 4.00 (3.75–4.30) | 17.175 | 0.000*** | 1>2>3 |
| 3 cc | 3.16 ± 0.45 | 3.05 (2.80–3.60) | ||||
| 5 cc | 2.28 ± 0.64 | 2.45 (1.75–2.65) | ||||
| Total | 3.17 ± 0.90 | 3.15 (2.60–3.80) | ||||
| T3 (1.71–3.71) | Control | 0.98 ± 0.18 | 0.95 (0.85–1.15) | 16.509 | 0.000*** | 1,2<3 |
| 3 cc | 1.53 ± 0.46 | 1.60 (1.15–1.90) | ||||
| 5 cc | 2.40 ± 0.37 | 2.45 (2.05–2.75) | ||||
| Total | 1.63 ±0.69 | 1.60 (1.05–2.15) | ||||
| T4 (0.7–1.48) | Control | 0.71 ± 0.21 | 0.65 (0.55–0.85) | 10.637 | 0.005** | 1<3 |
| 3 cc | 0.93 ± 0.18 | 0.90 (0.80–1.05) | ||||
| 5 cc | 1.14 ± 0.21 | 1.15 (1.00–1.30) | ||||
| Total | 0.93 ± 0.26 | 0.90 (0.75–1.10) | ||||
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001.
Differences of thyroid tissue histopathological findings between groups.
| Ort ± ss | Median (25–75) | Test | p | Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interfollicular connective tissue area | Control | 2681.87 ± 1697.61 | 2540.52 (1673.93–3446.80) | 9.555 | 0.008** | 1>3 |
| 3 cc | 1616.45 ± 1458.23 | 1091.29 (752.88–1840.93) | ||||
| 5 cc | 652.61 ± 580.83 | 483.49 (248.48–947.65) | ||||
| Total | 1650.31 ± 1530.91 | 1280.39 (570.99–2435.06) | ||||
| Intrafollicular colloid amount | Control | 76.52 ± 23.65 | 76.89 (58.28– 96.49) | 16.980 | 0.000*** | 1<2,3 |
| 3 cc | 147.11 ± 12.33 | 150.50 (138.20–152.86) | ||||
| 5 cc | 165.29 ± 19.17 | 157.33 (150.75–181.49) | ||||
| Total | 129.64 ± 43.11 | 148.63 (96.49–154.96) | ||||
| Follicular diameter | Control | 92.10 ± 19.87 | 100.39 (77.28–105.48) | 15.540 | 0.000*** | 1<2,3 |
| 3 cc | 183.63 ±14.26 | 184.35 (174.51–189.16) | ||||
| 5 cc | 197.71 ± 25.28 | 188.94 (179.07–215.82) | ||||
| Total | 157.81 ± 51.62 | 179.07 (105.48–189.16) | ||||
| Epithelialheight | Control | 5.38 ± 1.00 | 5.66 (4.92–5.89) | 18.604 | 0.000*** | 1<2<3 |
| 3 cc | 9.13 ± 2.29 | 8.22 (8.00–10.99) | ||||
| 5 cc | 14.74 ± 1.90 | 15.06 (14.20-15.79) | ||||
| Total | 9.78 ± 4.36 | 8.22 (5.79-14.23) | ||||
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
Differences of thyroid tissue histopathological scoring between groups.
| Control | 3 cc | 5 cc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 1 2 3 | 0 1 2 3 | 0 1 2 3 | |
| Degeneration in follicles | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Fibrosis | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Atypical follicle epithelium | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Mononuclear cell infiltration | 8 | 7 1 | 7 1 |
(0) score, no structural damage; (1) score, minimal damage; (2) score, moderate damage; (3) score, serious damage.