BACKGROUND: The International Society for Physical Activity and Health (ISPAH) is a leading global organization working to advance research, policy, and practice to promote physical activity. Given the expanding evidence base on interventions to promote physical activity, it was timely to review and update a major ISPAH advocacy document-Investments that Work for Physical Activity (2011). METHODS: Eight investment areas were agreed upon through consensus. Literature reviews were conducted to identify key evidence relevant to policymakers in each sector or setting. RESULTS: The 8 investment areas were as follows: whole-of-school programs; active transport; active urban design; health care; public education; sport and recreation; workplaces; and community-wide programs. Evidence suggests that the largest population health benefit will be achieved by combining these investments and implementing a systems-based approach. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing consensus on 'what works' to change physical activity behavior is a cornerstone of successful advocacy, as is having appropriate resources to communicate key messages to a wide range of stakeholders. ISPAH has created a range of resources related to the new investments described in this paper. These resources are available in the 'advocacy toolkit' on the ISPAH website (www.ispah.org/resources).
BACKGROUND: The International Society for Physical Activity and Health (ISPAH) is a leading global organization working to advance research, policy, and practice to promote physical activity. Given the expanding evidence base on interventions to promote physical activity, it was timely to review and update a major ISPAH advocacy document-Investments that Work for Physical Activity (2011). METHODS: Eight investment areas were agreed upon through consensus. Literature reviews were conducted to identify key evidence relevant to policymakers in each sector or setting. RESULTS: The 8 investment areas were as follows: whole-of-school programs; active transport; active urban design; health care; public education; sport and recreation; workplaces; and community-wide programs. Evidence suggests that the largest population health benefit will be achieved by combining these investments and implementing a systems-based approach. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing consensus on 'what works' to change physical activity behavior is a cornerstone of successful advocacy, as is having appropriate resources to communicate key messages to a wide range of stakeholders. ISPAH has created a range of resources related to the new investments described in this paper. These resources are available in the 'advocacy toolkit' on the ISPAH website (www.ispah.org/resources).
Entities:
Keywords:
health promotion; interventions; policy; public health; public health practice
Authors: James Nobles; Charlotte Fox; Alan Inman-Ward; Tom Beasley; Sabi Redwood; Russ Jago; Charlie Foster Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Harriet Koorts; Paul M Salmon; Christopher T V Swain; Samuel Cassar; David Strickland; Jo Salmon Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 8.915
Authors: E L Bird; D Evans; S Gray; E Atherton; J Blackshaw; M Brannan; N Corrigan; D Weiner Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: James Nobles; Jessica Wheeler; Kirsty Dunleavy-Harris; Richard Holmes; Alan Inman-Ward; Alexandra Potts; Jennifer Hall; Sabi Redwood; Russell Jago; Charlie Foster Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Abdulaziz Farooq; Laura Basterfield; Ashley J Adamson; Mark S Pearce; Adrienne R Hughes; Xanne Janssen; Mathew G Wilson; John J Reilly Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Tessa Strain; Stephen J Sharp; Andrew Spiers; Helen Price; Ciara Williams; Carol Fraser; Søren Brage; Katrien Wijndaele; Paul Kelly Journal: Lancet Reg Health Eur Date: 2021-11-30