M J M Chinapaw1,2, C B Terwee1,2, L H Klaufus3,1, M A J Luijten4,2, E Verlinden3, M F van der Wal3, L Haverman4, P Cuijpers5. 1. Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Health Promotion, and Health Care Innovation, Public Health Service Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aims to validate the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS pediatric item banks v2.0 Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms, the short forms 8a, and computerized adaptive tests (CATs) in a general Dutch population and to provide reference data. METHODS: Participants (N = 2,893, aged 8-18), recruited by two internet survey providers, completed both item banks. These item banks were assessed on unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity, Graded Response Model (GRM) item fit, and differential item functioning (DIF) for gender, age group, region, ethnicity, and language. The short forms and CATs were assessed on reliability and construct validity compared to the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale short version (RCADS-22) subscales. Reference scores were calculated. RESULTS: Both item banks showed sufficient unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity, and GRM item fit, except for three Depressive Symptoms items that showed insufficient GRM item fit. No DIF was found when using ordinal regression analyses, except for two Depressive Symptoms items that showed DIF for language; all items showed DIF for language when using IRT PRO, except for one Anxiety item. Both short forms and CATs revealed sufficient reliability for moderate and severe levels of anxiety and depression, as well as high positive correlations with corresponding RCADS-22 subscales and slightly lower correlations with non-corresponding RCADS-22 subscales. CONCLUSION: The Dutch-Flemish PROMIS pediatric item banks v2.0 Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms, the short forms 8a and CATs are useful to assess and monitor anxiety and depression in a general population. Reference data are presented.
PURPOSE: This study aims to validate the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS pediatric item banks v2.0 Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms, the short forms 8a, and computerized adaptive tests (CATs) in a general Dutch population and to provide reference data. METHODS:Participants (N = 2,893, aged 8-18), recruited by two internet survey providers, completed both item banks. These item banks were assessed on unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity, Graded Response Model (GRM) item fit, and differential item functioning (DIF) for gender, age group, region, ethnicity, and language. The short forms and CATs were assessed on reliability and construct validity compared to the Revised ChildAnxiety and Depression Scale short version (RCADS-22) subscales. Reference scores were calculated. RESULTS: Both item banks showed sufficient unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity, and GRM item fit, except for three Depressive Symptoms items that showed insufficient GRM item fit. No DIF was found when using ordinal regression analyses, except for two Depressive Symptoms items that showed DIF for language; all items showed DIF for language when using IRT PRO, except for one Anxiety item. Both short forms and CATs revealed sufficient reliability for moderate and severe levels of anxiety and depression, as well as high positive correlations with corresponding RCADS-22 subscales and slightly lower correlations with non-corresponding RCADS-22 subscales. CONCLUSION: The Dutch-Flemish PROMIS pediatric item banks v2.0 Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms, the short forms 8a and CATs are useful to assess and monitor anxiety and depression in a general population. Reference data are presented.
Authors: E A Stockings; L Degenhardt; T Dobbins; Y Y Lee; H E Erskine; H A Whiteford; G Patton Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Guilherme V Polanczyk; Giovanni A Salum; Luisa S Sugaya; Arthur Caye; Luis A Rohde Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Rinad S Beidas; Rebecca E Stewart; Lucia Walsh; Steven Lucas; Margaret Mary Downey; Kamilah Jackson; Tara Fernandez; David S Mandell Journal: Cogn Behav Pract Date: 2015-02-01
Authors: Chad Ebesutani; Steven P Reise; Bruce F Chorpita; Chelsea Ale; Jennifer Regan; John Young; Charmaine Higa-McMillan; John R Weisz Journal: Psychol Assess Date: 2012-02-13
Authors: David Cella; Susan Yount; Nan Rothrock; Richard Gershon; Karon Cook; Bryce Reeve; Deborah Ader; James F Fries; Bonnie Bruce; Mattias Rose Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: H E Erskine; T E Moffitt; W E Copeland; E J Costello; A J Ferrari; G Patton; L Degenhardt; T Vos; H A Whiteford; J G Scott Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Karen Fischer; Jacintha M Tieskens; Tinca J C Polderman; Arne Popma; Michiel A J Luijten; Josjan Zijlmans; Hedy A van Oers; Rowdy de Groot; Daniël van der Doelen; Hanneke van Ewijk; Helen Klip; Rikkert M van der Lans; Ronald De Meyer; Malindi van der Mheen; Maud M van Muilekom; I Hyun Ruisch; Lorynn Teela; Germie van den Berg; Hilgo Bruining; Rachel van der Rijken; Jan Buitelaar; Pieter J Hoekstra; Ramón Lindauer; Kim J Oostrom; Wouter Staal; Robert Vermeiren; Ronald Cornet; Lotte Haverman; Meike Bartels Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Leonie Klaufus; Eva Verlinden; Marcel van der Wal; Pim Cuijpers; Mai Chinapaw; Filip Smit Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Josjan Zijlmans; Lorynn Teela; Hanneke van Ewijk; Helen Klip; Malindi van der Mheen; Hyun Ruisch; Michiel A J Luijten; Maud M van Muilekom; Kim J Oostrom; Jan Buitelaar; Pieter J Hoekstra; Ramón Lindauer; Arne Popma; Wouter Staal; Robert Vermeiren; Hedy A van Oers; Lotte Haverman; Tinca J C Polderman Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 4.157