Literature DB >> 33983558

The Role of Clearinghouses in Promoting Transparent Research: A Methodological Study of Transparency Practices for Preventive Interventions.

Pamela R Buckley1, Charles R Ebersole2, Christine M Steeger3, Laura E Michaelson4, Karl G Hill3, Frances Gardner5.   

Abstract

Transparency of research methods is vital to science, though incentives are variable, with only some journals and funders adopting transparency policies. Clearinghouses are also important stakeholders; however, to date none have implemented formal procedures that facilitate transparent research. Using data from the longest standing clearinghouse, we examine transparency practices for preventive interventions to explore the role of online clearinghouses in incentivizing researchers to make their research more transparent. We conducted a descriptive analysis of 88 evaluation reports reviewed in 2018-2019 by Blueprints for Healthy Youth Development, when the clearinghouse began checking for trial registrations, and expanded on these efforts by applying broader transparency standards to interventions eligible for an endorsement on the Blueprints website during the study period. Reports were recent, with 84% published between 2010 and 2019. We found that few reports had data, code, or research materials that were publicly available. Meanwhile, 40% had protocols that were registered, but only 8% were registered prospectively, while one-quarter were registered before conducting analyses. About one-third included details in a registered protocol describing the treatment contrast and planned inclusions, and less than 5% had a registered statistical analysis plan (e.g., planned analytical methods, pre-specified covariates). Confirmatory research was distinguished from exploratory work in roughly 40% of reports. Reports published more recently (after 2015) had higher rates of transparency. Preventive intervention research needs to be more transparent. Since clearinghouses rely on robust findings to make well-informed decisions and researchers are incentivized to meet clearinghouse standards, clearinghouses should consider policies that encourage transparency to improve the credibility of evidence-based interventions.
© 2021. Society for Prevention Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clearinghouses; Open badges system; Preregistration; Registries; Scoping review; TOP guidelines; Transparency; Trial registration

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33983558     DOI: 10.1007/s11121-021-01252-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Sci        ISSN: 1389-4986


  17 in total

1.  The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships.

Authors:  Melissa S Anderson; Emily A Ronning; Raymond De Vries; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Business not as usual.

Authors:  Eric Eich
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-11-27

3.  Advancing Transparency and Openness in Child Development Research: Opportunities.

Authors:  Lisa A Gennetian; Catherine S Tamis-LeMonda; Michael C Frank
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2020-02-24

Review 4.  The Conduct and Reporting of Child Health Research: An Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2012 and Evaluation of Change over 5 Years.

Authors:  Allison Gates; Lisa Hartling; Ben Vandermeer; Patrina Caldwell; Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis; Sarah Curtis; Ricardo M Fernandes; Terry P Klassen; Katrina Williams; Michele P Dyson
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Mapping the universe of registered reports.

Authors:  Tom E Hardwicke; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-11

6.  An overview of evidence-based program registers (EBPRs) for behavioral health.

Authors:  Jason T Burkhardt; Daniela C Schröter; Stephen Magura; Stephanie N Means; Chris L S Coryn
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2015-02

7.  Trial Registration and Outcome Reporting in Child and Pediatric Psychology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aimee K Hildenbrand; Cecily Conour; Jacob A Straus; Sacha Moufarrej; Tonya M Palermo
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2019-10-01

8.  Transparency of Outcome Reporting and Trial Registration of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

Authors:  Marleine Azar; Kira E Riehm; Dean McKay; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials.

Authors:  Sean Grant; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Paul Montgomery; Geraldine Macdonald; Susan Michie; Sally Hopewell; David Moher
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.

Authors:  Kerry Dwan; Douglas G Altman; Juan A Arnaiz; Jill Bloom; An-Wen Chan; Eugenia Cronin; Evelyne Decullier; Philippa J Easterbrook; Erik Von Elm; Carrol Gamble; Davina Ghersi; John P A Ioannidis; John Simes; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clearinghouse Standards of Evidence on the Transparency, Openness, and Reproducibility of Intervention Evaluations.

Authors:  Evan Mayo-Wilson; Sean Grant; Lauren H Supplee
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2021-08-06

2.  Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science.

Authors:  Sean Grant; Kathleen E Wendt; Bonnie J Leadbeater; Lauren H Supplee; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Frances Gardner; Catherine P Bradshaw
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2022-02-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.