Literature DB >> 33983518

Improving virtual screening results with MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring.

Harutyun Sahakyan1,2.   

Abstract

Virtual screening (VS) based on molecular docking is one of the most useful methods in computer-aided drug design. By allowing to identify computationally putative ligands binding to the proteins of interest, VS dramatically reduces the time and expense of the development of novel therapeutics. Among the limitations of the VS approaches is the low accuracy of scoring functions implemented in docking methods for assessing binding affinity. Many such scoring functions are developed for rapid, high-throughput evaluation of binding energy of multiple conformations generated by a searching algorithm. The methods for more rigorous calculation of binding affinity calculation are generally time-consuming. Even so, in many studies more accurate methods were used for rescoring of the final poses and false-positive hits evaluation. We performed VS for three benchmark sets and used energy minimization with MM/PB(GB)SA methods (molecular mechanics energies combined with the Poisson-Boltzmann or generalized Born and surface area) to rescore binding affinities. The comparison of the area under the curve (AUC), enrichment factor (EF), and Boltzmann-enhanced discrimination of receiver operating characteristics (BEDROC) showed essential improvements in the binding energy prediction after the rescoring. Finally, we provide a program for minimization and rescoring VS results based on freely available AmberTools. The code requires just the final binding poses of the ligand as the input and can be used with any docking program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CADD; Computer-aided drug design; MM/GBSA; MM/PBSA; Rescoring; Virtual screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33983518     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-021-00389-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  10 in total

1.  Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.

Authors:  Claudio N Cavasotto; Ruben A Abagyan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database.

Authors:  Dariusz Plewczynski; Michał Łaźniewski; Rafał Augustyniak; Krzysztof Ginalski
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 3.  Virtual screening: an endless staircase?

Authors:  Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  A comparison of different electrostatic potentials on prediction accuracy in CoMFA and CoMSIA studies.

Authors:  Keng-Chang Tsai; Yu-Chen Chen; Nai-Wan Hsiao; Chao-Li Wang; Chih-Lung Lin; Yu-Ching Lee; Minyong Li; Binghe Wang
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.514

5.  Perspective on Free-Energy Perturbation Calculations for Chemical Equilibria.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen; Laura L Thomas
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments.

Authors:  G Madhavi Sastry; Matvey Adzhigirey; Tyler Day; Ramakrishna Annabhimoju; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Tingjun Hou; Junmei Wang; Youyong Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Postprocessing of docked protein-ligand complexes using implicit solvation models.

Authors:  Anton Lindström; Lotta Edvinsson; Andreas Johansson; C David Andersson; Ida E Andersson; Florian Raubacher; Anna Linusson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Structural basis for activation of fatty acid-binding protein 4.

Authors:  Richard E Gillilan; Stephen D Ayers; Noa Noy
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.

Authors:  Samuel Genheden; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.098

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Computational methods and theory for ion channel research.

Authors:  C Guardiani; F Cecconi; L Chiodo; G Cottone; P Malgaretti; L Maragliano; M L Barabash; G Camisasca; M Ceccarelli; B Corry; R Roth; A Giacomello; B Roux
Journal:  Adv Phys X       Date:  2022

2.  A proteomics-MM/PBSA dual approach for the analysis of SARS-CoV-2 main protease substrate peptide specificity.

Authors:  Gloria Gallo; Uilla Barcick; Camila Coelho; Murilo Salardani; Maurício F Camacho; Daniela Cajado-Carvalho; Flávio V Loures; Solange M T Serrano; Leon Hardy; André Zelanis; Martin Würtele
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.867

3.  Combination of ligand and structure based virtual screening approaches for the discovery of potential PARP1 inhibitors.

Authors:  Mohammad M Al-Sanea; Garri Chilingaryan; Narek Abelyan; Michael Mamikonyan; Hayk Gasparyan; Sargis Hovhannisyan; Abdelrahman Hamdi; Ahmed R Ali; Samy Selim; Ahmed A B Mohamed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Identification of non-classical hCA XII inhibitors using combination of computational approaches for drug design and discovery.

Authors:  Mohammad M Al-Sanea; Garri Chilingaryan; Narek Abelyan; Grigor Arakelov; Harutyun Sahakyan; Vahram G Arakelov; Karen Nazaryan; Shaimaa Hussein; Gharam M Alazmi; Haifa E Alsharari; Waad M Al-Faraj; Faten S Alruwaili; Nouf Q Albilasi; Tahani S Alsharari; Abdulaziz A S Alsaleh; Turki M Alazmi; Atiah H Almalki; Nasser H Alotaibi; Mohamed A Abdelgawad
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Nitric Oxide Photo-Donor Hybrids of Ciprofloxacin and Norfloxacin: A Shift in Activity from Antimicrobial to Anticancer Agents.

Authors:  Antonino Nicolò Fallica; Carla Barbaraci; Emanuele Amata; Lorella Pasquinucci; Rita Turnaturi; Maria Dichiara; Sebastiano Intagliata; Marzia Bruna Gariboldi; Emanuela Marras; Viviana Teresa Orlandi; Claudia Ferroni; Cecilia Martini; Antonio Rescifina; Davide Gentile; Greta Varchi; Agostino Marrazzo
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 8.039

6.  A New Insight into Toxicity of Colchicine Analogues by Molecular Docking Analysis Based on Intestinal Tight Junction Protein ZO-1.

Authors:  Jiali Liu; Rongrong Gao; Xuejing Gu; Bin Yu; Yan Wu; Qiushi Li; Ping Xiang; Hui Xu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.