| Literature DB >> 33981834 |
Nilkanth Mukund Deshpande1,2, Shilpa Gite3,4, Rajanikanth Aluvalu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Any contamination in the human body can prompt changes in blood cell morphology and various parameters of cells. The minuscule images of blood cells are examined for recognizing the contamination inside the body with an expectation of maladies and variations from the norm. Appropriate segmentation of these cells makes the detection of a disease progressively exact and vigorous. Microscopic blood cell analysis is a critical activity in the pathological analysis. It highlights the investigation of appropriate malady after exact location followed by an order of abnormalities, which assumes an essential job in the analysis of various disorders, treatment arranging, and assessment of results of treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Blood cell; Classifier; Disease detection; Feature extraction; Image processing; Leukemia; Microscopic images; Neural network; Red blood cell; White blood cell
Year: 2021 PMID: 33981834 PMCID: PMC8080427 DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.460
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ Comput Sci ISSN: 2376-5992
Figure 1Co-occurrence of keyword.
Source: VOSviewer 1.65.
Figure 2Components of blood.
Figure 3(A) Normal cells, (B) Leukemia cells, (C) Different components.
Figure 4Generalized methodology.
Figure 5Decision tree.
Source: https://pianalytix.com/decision-tree-algorithm/.
Figure 6Random forest algorithm.
Source https://www.javatpoint.com/machine-learning-random-forest-algorithm.
Figure 7SVM and its different concepts.
Source: https://www.javatpoint.com/machine-learning-support-vector-machine-algorithm.
Figure 8Generalized CNN architecture (Phung & Rhee, 2019).
Different databases available.
| Name | Image formats | Number of images | Color depth | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCCD Database ( | JPEG, xml, metadata | 12,500 | Not mentioned | Different sub-types of blood cells | |
| ALL-IDB (Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Database) ( | ALL-IDB-1 | JPEG | 109 (510 lymphoblast) | 24-bit, 2,592 × 1,944 | Cancerous |
| ALL-IDB-2 | JPEG | 260 (130 lymphoblast) | 24-bit 257 × 257 | Cancerous | |
| Atlas of Hematology by Nivaldo Mediros ( | JPEG | 300 | Not mentioned | Visceral leishmaniasis, cellular simlilarity, morphologic similarities | |
| ASH Image Bank ( | JPEG | 5,084 | Not mentioned | Cancerous and other different types of images | |
| Leukocyte Images for Segmentation and Classification ( | (LISC) | 400 (720 × 576) | Not mentioned | Healthy subjects with different sub-types of blood cells | |
| C-NMC Dataset | BMP | 15,135 | Not mentioned | Normal and cancerous images of blood cells | |
Different databases available.
| Name | Remark | |
|---|---|---|
| BCCD Database ( | ||
| ALL-IDB-1 and 2 ( | ||
| Atlas of Hematology by Nivaldo Mediros ( | ||
| ASH Image Bank ( | ||
| Leukocyte Images for Segmentation and Classification (LISC) ( | ||
| C-NMC Dataset | ||
Comparison of different methods for disease detection.
| Author | Year | Methodology | Performance measure | Database | No. of images |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | K-means clustering for detection of WBC. Histogram and Zack algorithm for grouping WBCs, SVM for classification | Efficiency: 93.57 -% | ALL-IDB | 7 | |
| 2015 | Multilayer perceptron, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Dempster Shafer | Accuracy: Dempster-Shafer method: 96.72% SVM model: 96.67% | ALL-IDB2 | 180 | |
| 2018 | Panel selection for segmentation, K-means clustering for features extraction, and image refinement. Classification by morphological features of leukemia cells detection | Accuracy: 99.517% , Sensitivity: 99.348%, Specificity: 99.529% | Private datasets | 757 | |
| 2019 | Histogram Equalization, Zack Algorithm, Watershed Segmentation, Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification | Accuracy: 93.70% Sensitivity: 92% Specificity: 91% | ALL-IDB | 108 | |
| 2019 | K-means and watershed algorithm, SVM, PCA | Accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, FNR, precision all are above 97% | private | Not mentioned | |
| 2019 | Triangle thresholding, discrete orthogonal S-Stransform (DOST), adaboost algorithm with random forest (ADBRF) classifier | Accuracy: 99.66% | ALL-IDB1 | 108 | |
| 2019 | MI based model, local directional pattern (LDP) chronological sine cosine algorithm (SCA) | Accuracy: 98.7%, TPR:987%, TNR:98% | AA-IDB2 | Not mentioned | |
| 2019 | K-means and watershed algorithm, SVM, PCA | Accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, FNR, precision all are above 97% | Private | Not mentioned | |
| 2019 | Expectation maximization algorithm, PCA, sparse representation | Accuracy, Specificity, Sensitivity all more than 92% | ALL-IDB2 | 260 | |
| 2019 | CNN | Accuracy: 88% leukemia cells and 81% for subtypes classification | ALL-IDB, ASH Image Bank | Not mentioned | |
| 2019 | ResNeXt CNN | Accuracy, Sensitivity and precision above 90% | Private | 18,365 | |
| 2020 | VGGNet, statistically enhanced Salp Swarm Algorithm (SESSA) | Accuracy: 96% dataset 1 and 87.9% for dataset 2 | ALL-IDB, C-NMC | Not mentioned |