| Literature DB >> 33978829 |
Georg Berding1, Karin Weissenborn2,3, Meike Dirks4,5, Ralph Buchert6, Ann-Katrin Wirries2, Henning Pflugrad2,3, Gerrit M Grosse2, Carlotta Petrusch2, Christian Schütze7, Florian Wilke7, Martin Mamach7, Linda Hamann7, Laura B N Langer1, Xiao-Qi Ding8, Hannelore Barg-Hock9, Jürgen Klempnauer9, Christian H Wetzel10, Mario Lukacevic1, Eike Janssen1, Mariella Kessler1, Frank M Bengel1, Lilli Geworski7, Rainer Rupprecht10, Tobias L Ross1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) can cause long-term impairment of brain function. Possible pathomechanisms include alterations of the cerebral immune system. This study used positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with the translocator protein (TSPO) ligand 18F-GE-180 to evaluate microglial activation in liver-transplanted patients under different regimens of immunosuppression.Entities:
Keywords: 18F-GE-180; Cognitive function; Imaging; Immunosuppression; Translocator protein (TSPO)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33978829 PMCID: PMC8712291 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05398-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ISSN: 1619-7070 Impact factor: 9.236
Demographic and clinical characteristics for patient groups and controls
| Subgroups | TSPO-GT | N | Sex | Age | Education | Years since LT | Years on standard-dose CNI | RBANS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) CNI free | All | 3 | 3/0 | 64.3 ± 9.9 | 12.0 ± 1.7 | 13.7 ± 2.1 | 3.7 ± 3.8 | 97.0 ± 14.8 |
| LAB | 1 | 1/0 | 71 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 107 | |
| MAB | 1 | 1/0 | 53 | 13 | 12 | 2 | 104 | |
| HAB | 1 | 1/0 | 69 | 10 | 16 | 8 | 80 | |
| (2) CNI low dose | All | 9 | 7/2 | 60.3 ± 11.4 | 10.1 ± 1.5 | 14.0 ± 2.3 | 3.9 ± 2.1 | 94.9 ± 14.9 |
| LAB | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| MAB | 2 | 2/0 | 52.5 ± 21.9 | 9 ± 0.0 | 14.5 ± 3.5 | 3.0 ± 1.4 | 88.0 ± 21.2 | |
| HAB | 7 | 5/2 | 62.6 ± 8.1 | 10.4 ± 1.6 | 13.9 ± 2.3 | 4.1 ± 2.3 | 96.9 ± 14.2 | |
| (3) CNI standard dose | All | 10 | 7/3 | 57.1 ± 7.6 | 10.5 ± 1.6 | 15.0 ± 6.4 | 12.8 ± 6.1 | 97.8 ± 9.5 |
| LAB | 2 | 2/0 | 63.0 ± 9.9 | 9.5 ± 0.7 | 12.0 ± 5.7 | 8.5 ± 2.1 | 87.0 ± 5.6 | |
| MAB | 5 | 4/1 | 56.8 ± 4.7 | 10.0 ± 1.2 | 15.0 ± 6.3 | 14.4 ± 6.3 | 101 ± 9.1 | |
| HAB | 3 | 1/ 2 | 53.7 ± 10.6 | 12.0 ± 1.7 | 17.0 ± 8.7 | 13.0 ± 7.9 | 99.7 ± 8.7 | |
| (4) Controls | All | 9 | 5/4 | 57.9 ± 9.2 | 11.6 ± 1.5 | – | – | 101 ± 9.8 |
| LAB | 1 | 1/0 | 63.0 | 10 | – | – | 101 | |
| MAB | 3 | 1/ 2 | 50.0 ± 3.6 | 12.7 ± 0.6 | – | – | 105 ± 9.5 | |
| HAB | 5 | 3/2 | 61.6 ± 9.8 | 11.2 ± 1.6 | – | – | 98.6 ± 11.4 | |
| p | 0.432 | 0.480 | 0.651 | 0.138 | 0.832 | 0.752 |
Data are mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis with chi-square test (for sex and TSPO genotype) and ANOVA (for age, education, years since LT, years on standard-dose CNI, RBANS Total scale) for the comparison of all 4 groups. If significant (p-value in bold), bilateral comparison as post hoc test was performed (see*)
*Subgroup 1 vs 2: p = 0.899, 1 vs 3: = 0.035, 2 vs 3: = 0.001
GT, genotype; N, number; LT, liver transplantation; SD, standard deviation; CNI, calcineurininhibitors, RBANS, Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status
Results of the RBANS
| Subgroups | N | RBANS | RBANS | RBANS | RBANS | RBANS | RBANS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) CNI free | 3 | 97.7 ± 17.1 | 88.0 ± 19.3 | 109.0 ± 10.5 | 108.0 ± 3.5 | 86.3 ± 29.8 | 97.0 ± 14.8 |
| (2) CNI low dose | 9 | 95.9 ± 11.3 | 89.2 ± 12.7 | 102.4 ± 14.9 | 98.7 ± 18.5 | 91.6 ± 11.9 | 94.9 ± 14.9 |
| (3) CNI standard dose | 10 | 101.5 ± 15.8 | 94.1 ± 16.5 | 97.0 ± 12.2 | 101.2 ± 17.8 | 101.4 ± 5.2 | 97.8 ± 9.5 |
| (4) Controls | 9 | 108.4 ± 12.6 | 86.8 ± 17.6 | 104.4 ± 10.3 | 105.9 ± 20.9 | 100.0 ± 9.9 | 101 ± 9.8 |
| P (all groups) | 0.282 | 0.782 | 0.419 | 0.797 | 0.138 | 0.752 | |
| P (P/C) | 0.077 | 0.474 | 0.476 | 0.504 | 0.360 | 0.332 |
Values are given in mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA (all 4 groups) and unpaired Student’s t-test (patient group vs. control group)
RBANS, Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status; P, patients; C, controls
Fig. 1Mean and standard deviation of VT in the control group separated for brain region and TSPO genotype (LAB, MAB, HAB). HAB, high affinity binder n = 5; LAB, low affinity binder n = 1; MAB, mixed affinity binder n = 3; SLF, superior longitudinal fasciculus; TSPO, translocator protein; VT, distribution volume
Fig. 2Mean of VT in different brain regions from controls and patients separated according to TSPO genotype (MAB, HAB)/ HAB, high affinity binder; MAB, mixed affinity binder; SLF, superior longitudinal fasciculus; TSPO, translocator protein; VT, total distribution volume
Fig. 3Mean VT in 12 brain regions from MAB and HAB subjects separated according to controls, patients on low-dose CNI and standard-dose CNI. CNI, calcineurininhibitors; HAB, high affinity binder; MAB, mixed affinity binder; SLF, superior longitudinal fasciculus; VT, total distribution volume
Fig. 4Representative transversal slices of the individual voxel-based VT maps for all study participants separated according to subgroup and TSPO genotype. The figure illustrates the TSPO genotype effect on VT (HAB > MAB > LAB) in general and in particular, e.g., a reduction of VT in the patients compared to controls that is mainly driven by HAB patients under low-dose CNI therapy. CNI, calcineurininhibitors; HAB, high affinity binder; L, left; LAB, low affinity binder; MAB, mixed affinity binder; VT, total distribution volume; R, right