| Literature DB >> 27349244 |
Claire Feeney1,2, Gregory Scott3, Joel Raffel3, S Roberts3, Christopher Coello3, Amy Jolly3, Graham Searle3, A P Goldstone3, David J Brooks3,4, Richard S Nicholas3, William Trigg5, Roger N Gunn3, David J Sharp3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: PET can image neuroinflammation by targeting the translocator protein (TSPO), which is upregulated in activated microglia. The high nonspecific binding of the first-generation TSPO radioligand [11C]PK-11195 limits accurate quantification. [18F]GE-180, a novel TSPO ligand, displays superior binding to [11C]PK-11195 in vitro. Our objectives were to: (1) evaluate tracer characteristics of [18F]GE-180 in the brains of healthy human subjects; and (2) investigate whether the TSPO Ala147Thr polymorphism influences outcome measures.Entities:
Keywords: GE180; Kinetic analysis; Neuroinflammation; Positron emission tomography (PET); Quantification; Translocator protein (TSPO)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27349244 PMCID: PMC5047949 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3444-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ISSN: 1619-7070 Impact factor: 9.236
Fig. 1Overview of data analysis. The MIAKAT™ analysis toolkit was used for image processing (a), blood data processing (b) and kinetic modelling (c) of the PET data
Fig. 2Blood data. a Whole blood (red) and parent in plasma (black) curves for one subject. b The fraction of unchanged parent compound over time for high-affinity binders (HAB, red) and mixed-affinity binders (MAB, blue). c Plasma-to-blood ratio over time for HABs and MABs. Values are plotted in b and c as means ± standard error of the mean
Fig. 3Imaging data. Time–activity curves (TACs) are shown for high-affinity binders (HAB) and mixed-affinity binders (MAB) in the frontal grey matter (a) and thalamus (b). Standardized uptake values (SUV) are plotted as mean ± standard error of the mean. c SUV image calculated from the 60 – 90-min PET frames superimposed on the coregistered T1-weighted MR image in a representative MAB subject
Parameter estimates and model fits
| Model | Region |
|
|
|
|
| Distribution volume ratio | AIC winsa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1TC | Frontal lobe | 0.00472 (0.0041 – 0.006) | 0.0271 (0.023 – 0.028) | 0.171 (0.15 – 0.22) | 0.939 (0.94 – 0.95) | 2/10 | ||
| Parietal lobe | 0.00513 (0.004 – 0.0061) | 0.027 (0.024 – 0.028) | 0.19 (0.16 – 0.22) | 0.969 (0.96 – 1) | 1/10 | |||
| Temporal lobe | 0.00514 (0.0048 – 0.006) | 0.0266 (0.025 – 0.028) | 0.182 (0.17 – 0.24) | 1.04 (1 – 1) | 0/10 | |||
| Occipital lobe | 0.00621 (0.0057 – 0.0074) | 0.03 (0.025 – 0.032) | 0.214 (0.19 – 0.25) | 1.12 (1.1 – 1.2) | 0/10 | |||
| Thalamus | 0.00555 (0.0046 – 0.0058) | 0.0261 (0.024 – 0.028) | 0.182 (0.17 – 0.24) | 1.03 (0.96 – 1.1) | 0/10 | |||
| Striatum | 0.00358 (0.003 – 0.0046) | 0.0241 (0.021 – 0.025) | 0.155 (0.14 – 0.2) | 0.826 (0.78 – 0.89) | 8/10 | |||
| Cerebellum | 0.00656 (0.0054 – 0.0076) | 0.0339 (0.034 – 0.034) | 0.178 (0.16 – 0.22) | 0.968 (0.91 – 1) | 0/10 | |||
| 2TC | Frontal lobe | 0.0102 (0.0089 – 0.013) | 0.195 (0.15 – 1.6) | 0.0301 (0.024 – 0.15) | 0.00653 (0.004 – 0.017) | 0.346 (0.26 – 0.5) | 0.984 (0.96 – 1.2) | 8/10 |
| Parietal lobe | 0.0116 (0.011 – 0.014) | 0.192 (0.15 – 0.25) | 0.0334 (0.025 – 0.039) | 0.00873 (0.0045 – 0.014) | 0.33 (0.31 – 0.42) | 1.01 (0.98 – 1.1) | 9/10 | |
| Temporal lobe | 0.0143 (0.012 – 0.032) | 0.217 (0.16 – 1.3) | 0.0348 (0.03 – 0.15) | 0.00927 (0.0063 – 0.016) | 0.306 (0.27 – 0.42) | 0.958 (0.93 – 1) | 10/10 | |
| Occipital lobe | 0.0238 (0.019 – 0.031) | 0.385 (0.2 – 0.62) | 0.0395 (0.036 – 0.054) | 0.0101 (0.0062 – 0.014) | 0.35 (0.3 – 0.52) | 1.07 (0.97 – 1.1) | 10/10 | |
| Thalamus | 0.0118 (0.011 – 0.014) | 0.16 (0.14 – 0.2) | 0.0315 (0.026 – 0.042) | 0.00881 (0.0062 – 0.012) | 0.376 (0.28 – 0.41) | 0.922 (0.81 – 1.1) | 10/10 | |
| Striatum | 0.00413 (0.0033 – 0.0088) | 1.14 (0.66 – 1.7) | 4.89 (0.62 – 9.1) | 0.14 (0.027 – 0.21) | 0.155 (0.14 – 0.22) | 0.451 (0.41 – 0.71) | 2/10 | |
| Cerebellum | 0.0224 (0.016 – 1.3) | 0.319 (0.23 – 78) | 0.0331 (0.029 – 0.091) | 0.0113 (0.0084 – 0.018) | 0.281 (0.25 – 0.33) | 0.916 (0.69 – 0.98) | 10/10 | |
| Logan | Frontal lobe | 0.265 (0.23 – 0.33) | 0.931 (0.92 – 0.97) | |||||
| Parietal lobe | 0.284 (0.23 – 0.35) | 0.996 (0.93 – 1) | ||||||
| Temporal lobe | 0.312 (0.24 – 0.36) | 1.01 (0.95 – 1.1) | ||||||
| Occipital lobe | 0.34 (0.3 – 0.39) | 1.14 (1.1 – 1.2) | ||||||
| Thalamus | 0.3 (0.26 – 0.31) | 0.991 (0.98 – 1) | ||||||
| Striatum | 0.25 (0.21 – 0.29) | 0.844 (0.7 – 0.92) | ||||||
| Cerebellum | 0.29 (0.24 – 0.3) | 0.99 (0.91 – 1) |
Data are presented as medians (interquartile ranges)
aFor the 1TC model versus the 2TC model, the data shown are the proportions of the ten subjects for whom the model was the more parsimonious (defined as having the lower AIC)
Fig. 4Kinetic modelling and time stability analysis. a Model fits are shown for one-tissue compartment model (reversible 1TC, dashed line) and two-tissue compartment model (reversible 2TC, red line) against a time–activity curve (black dots) for the parietal lobe. b Logan plot (black dashed line the most linear portion of the curve) for the same time–activity curve as in a. c Parietal lobe time–activity curve (solid line), 5 % whole-blood activity curve (red line) and the curve of the difference between the two curves (dashed line) highlights the significant contribution of blood signal to the time–activity curve. d Estimates of two-tissue compartment model V T calculated for 40 – 90-min scan windows in 10-min increments plotted as the absolute percentage difference compared to the final 90-min V T for the parietal lobe and cerebellum grey matter regions of interest. The values plotted are means ± standard error of the mean
Fig. 5Outcome measures. Six outcome measures for seven regions of interest (red high-affinity binders, blue mixed-affinity binders). a Two-tissue compartment model volume of distribution (2-TC VT). b Volume of distribution estimated using Logan plot (Logan VT). c Distribution volume ratio from the two-tissue compartment model using cortical grey matter as a reference region (2-TC DVR). d Distribution volume ratio estimated using Logan plot and cortical grey matter as a reference region (Logan DVR). e 60 – 90 min standardized uptake values (e SUV). f 60 – 90 min standardized uptake value ratios (f SUVR) using cortical grey matter as a reference region