Thomas Suter1,2, Ariane Gerber Popp3, Christopher W Kolz4,5, Robert Z Tashjian4, Heath B Henninger4,5. 1. Dept of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA. suter.thomas@gmx.net. 2. Dept of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kantonsspital Baselland, 4101, Bruderholz, Switzerland. suter.thomas@gmx.net. 3. Schulter Ellbogen Emmental, Rüegsauschachen, Switzerland. 4. Dept of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA. 5. Dept of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional planning of humeral head osteotomy in shoulder arthroplasty (SA) is understudied. This study evaluated whether a standard osteotomy technique along the anterosuperior anatomic neck (ASOT) could be surgically reproduced as pre-operatively planned on 3D-CT models. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pre-operative planning in 12 cadaver shoulders was performed on a 3D-CT model of the humerus to calculate the planned osteotomy plane (planned OP). The osteotomy was then performed using a free-hand technique, and a post-operative CT scan was obtained for analysis (performed OP). Planes were compared with regards to inclination, retroversion, and resected humeral head thickness so the accuracy could be quantified. RESULTS: The absolute errors between the performed and planned OP were 2° (0-10°), 5° (0-14°), and 4 mm (1-7 mm) for inclination, retroversion, and resected head thickness, respectively. Deviation < 10° for inclination and retroversion and < 5 mm for resected humeral head thickness between planned and performed OP was achieved in 92%, 83%, 58% of cases, respectively. No differences were found for inclination (p = 0.289), whereas retroversion and resected head thickness were smaller than planned (p ≤ 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative planning of the ASOT using a 3D-CT model is accurate within a threshold of 10° when using a free-hand technique in 92% of cases for inclination. Retroversion and resected head thickness differed from the pre-operative plan, thereby limiting the unrestricted use of humeral head osteotomy planning from 3D-CT models in SA. These findings are a reference for further studies to develop and quantify the accuracy of pre-operative planning software including cutting guides for SA using 3D-CT models. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic science article.
INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional planning of humeral head osteotomy in shoulder arthroplasty (SA) is understudied. This study evaluated whether a standard osteotomy technique along the anterosuperior anatomic neck (ASOT) could be surgically reproduced as pre-operatively planned on 3D-CT models. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pre-operative planning in 12 cadaver shoulders was performed on a 3D-CT model of the humerus to calculate the planned osteotomy plane (planned OP). The osteotomy was then performed using a free-hand technique, and a post-operative CT scan was obtained for analysis (performed OP). Planes were compared with regards to inclination, retroversion, and resected humeral head thickness so the accuracy could be quantified. RESULTS: The absolute errors between the performed and planned OP were 2° (0-10°), 5° (0-14°), and 4 mm (1-7 mm) for inclination, retroversion, and resected head thickness, respectively. Deviation < 10° for inclination and retroversion and < 5 mm for resected humeral head thickness between planned and performed OP was achieved in 92%, 83%, 58% of cases, respectively. No differences were found for inclination (p = 0.289), whereas retroversion and resected head thickness were smaller than planned (p ≤ 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative planning of the ASOT using a 3D-CT model is accurate within a threshold of 10° when using a free-hand technique in 92% of cases for inclination. Retroversion and resected head thickness differed from the pre-operative plan, thereby limiting the unrestricted use of humeral head osteotomy planning from 3D-CT models in SA. These findings are a reference for further studies to develop and quantify the accuracy of pre-operative planning software including cutting guides for SA using 3D-CT models. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic science article.
Authors: F Lebailly; L V P C Lima; A Clairemidi; B Aubert; S Guerard; Y Chaibi; J de Guise; C Fontaine; W Skalli Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 1.246
Authors: Joseph Iannotti; Justin Baker; Eric Rodriguez; John Brems; Eric Ricchetti; Mena Mesiha; Jason Bryan Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 5.284