Literature DB >> 3397861

Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: their relation to health complaints, perceived stress, and daily activities.

D Watson1.   

Abstract

I examined correlates of Negative Affect (NA) and Positive Affect (PA) through both within- and between-subjects analyses. Eighty subjects completed a daily questionnaire for 6-8 weeks. Each day they rated (a) their mood, (b) the extent to which they suffered from various minor physical problems, (c) their level of stress, (d) the time they spent socializing, and (e) whether or not they had exercised. Subjects also completed several trait tests measuring their general affective level, frequency of health problems, and social tendencies. A between-subjects analysis showed the expected pattern: Level of physical complaints and perceived stress were correlated with individual differences in NA but not in PA, whereas social indicators and frequency of exercise were related only to PA. The within-subjects results generally exhibited a similar pattern: Social activity and exercise were more strongly related to PA, whereas perceived stress was highly related to NA. However, the most significant finding was that, contrary to prediction, health complaints were as strongly related to intraindividual fluctuations in PA as in NA. Possible interpretations of the observed correlates of NA and PA are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3397861     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  117 in total

1.  Mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral interventions for chronic pain: differential effects on daily pain reactivity and stress reactivity.

Authors:  Mary C Davis; Alex J Zautra; Laurie D Wolf; Howard Tennen; Ellen W Yeung
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2014-11-03

2.  Economic difficulties and physical functioning in Finnish and British employees: contribution of social and behavioural factors.

Authors:  Elina Laaksonen; Tea Lallukka; Eero Lahelma; Jane E Ferrie; Ossi Rahkonen; Jenny Head; Michael G Marmot; Pekka Martikainen
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  The effects of perceived stress on reactions to messages designed to increase health behaviors.

Authors:  Murray Millar
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-10-13

4.  Associations of psychosocial working conditions with self-rated general health and mental health among municipal employees.

Authors:  Mikko Laaksonen; Ossi Rahkonen; Pekka Martikainen; Eero Lahelma
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Relations between daily activities and adolescent mood: the role of autonomy.

Authors:  Sally M Weinstein; Robin Mermelstein
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun

6.  A reformulation of quality of life for medical science.

Authors:  M E Hyland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The mediating role of anxiety in self-reported somatic complaints of depressed adolescents.

Authors:  J B Jolly; J N Wherry; D C Wiesner; D H Reed; J C Rule; J M Jolly
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1994-12

8.  Bolus isoproterenol infusions provide a reliable method for assessing interoceptive awareness.

Authors:  S S Khalsa; D Rudrauf; C Sandesara; B Olshansky; D Tranel
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Psychological states, serum markers and survival: associations and predictors of survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sarah Prinsloo; Qi Wei; Shellie M Scott; Nizar Tannir; Eric Jonasch; Louis Pisters; Lorenzo Cohen
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-06-17

10.  Specificity of cognitive and behavioral variables to positive and negative affect.

Authors:  Brent T Mausbach; Susan K Roepke; Colin A Depp; Thomas L Patterson; Igor Grant
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2009-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.