BACKGROUND: Childhood and current economic difficulties are associated with physical health. However, evidence concerning the factors underlying these associations is sparse. This study examines the contribution of a range of social and behavioural factors to associations between economic difficulties and physical functioning. METHODS: We used comparable data on middle-aged white-collar employees from the Finnish Helsinki Health Study cohort (n = 3843) and the British Whitehall II Study cohort (n = 3052). Our health outcome was physical functioning measured by the SF-36 Physical Component Summary. Relative indices of inequality (RII), calculated using logistic regression analysis, were used to examine associations between economic difficulties and physical functioning, and the contribution of further socio-economic circumstances, health behaviours, living arrangements and work-family conflicts to these associations. RESULTS: In age-adjusted models, childhood (RII = 1.76-3.06) and current (RII = 1.79-3.03) economic difficulties were associated with poor physical functioning in both cohorts. Further adjusting for work-family conflicts attenuated the associations of current economic difficulties with physical functioning in both cohorts, and also those of childhood economic difficulties in the Helsinki cohort. Adjustments for other socio-economic circumstances also caused some attenuation, while health behaviours and living arrangements had small or negligible effects. CONCLUSIONS: Conflicts between work and family contribute to the associations of economic difficulties with physical functioning among employees from Finland and Britain. This suggests that supporting people to cope with economic difficulties, and efforts to improve the balance between paid work and family may help employees maintain good physical functioning.
BACKGROUND: Childhood and current economic difficulties are associated with physical health. However, evidence concerning the factors underlying these associations is sparse. This study examines the contribution of a range of social and behavioural factors to associations between economic difficulties and physical functioning. METHODS: We used comparable data on middle-aged white-collar employees from the Finnish Helsinki Health Study cohort (n = 3843) and the British Whitehall II Study cohort (n = 3052). Our health outcome was physical functioning measured by the SF-36 Physical Component Summary. Relative indices of inequality (RII), calculated using logistic regression analysis, were used to examine associations between economic difficulties and physical functioning, and the contribution of further socio-economic circumstances, health behaviours, living arrangements and work-family conflicts to these associations. RESULTS: In age-adjusted models, childhood (RII = 1.76-3.06) and current (RII = 1.79-3.03) economic difficulties were associated with poor physical functioning in both cohorts. Further adjusting for work-family conflicts attenuated the associations of current economic difficulties with physical functioning in both cohorts, and also those of childhood economic difficulties in the Helsinki cohort. Adjustments for other socio-economic circumstances also caused some attenuation, while health behaviours and living arrangements had small or negligible effects. CONCLUSIONS: Conflicts between work and family contribute to the associations of economic difficulties with physical functioning among employees from Finland and Britain. This suggests that supporting people to cope with economic difficulties, and efforts to improve the balance between paid work and family may help employees maintain good physical functioning.
Authors: Paula A Braveman; Catherine Cubbin; Susan Egerter; Sekai Chideya; Kristen S Marchi; Marilyn Metzler; Samuel Posner Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-12-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Eero Lahelma; Pekka Martikainen; Ossi Rahkonen; Eva Roos; Peppiina Saastamoinen Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2005-07-13 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: G Davey Smith; C Hart; D Hole; P MacKinnon; C Gillis; G Watt; D Blane; V Hawthorne Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Tea Lallukka; Jane E Ferrie; Mika Kivimäki; Martin J Shipley; Ossi Rahkonen; Eero Lahelma Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Anna Svärd; Jouni Lahti; Eira Roos; Ossi Rahkonen; Eero Lahelma; Tea Lallukka; Minna Mänty Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Shervin Assari; James Smith; Ritesh Mistry; Mehdi Farokhnia; Mohsen Bazargan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Annalijn I Conklin; Nita G Forouhi; Marc Suhrcke; Paul Surtees; Nicholas J Wareham; Pablo Monsivais Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Annalijn I Conklin; Nita G Forouhi; Marc Suhrcke; Paul Surtees; Nicholas J Wareham; Pablo Monsivais Journal: Appetite Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 3.868