Literature DB >> 33978180

Risk trade-off analysis of returning home and radiation exposure after a nuclear disaster using a happy life expectancy indicator.

Michio Murakami1, Yoshitake Takebayashi1, Kyoko Ono2, Masaharu Tsubokura3,4,5.   

Abstract

It is crucial to evaluate ethical issues regarding evacuation orders, especially after a nuclear disaster. After the Fukushima accident in 2011, the Japanese government ordered the affected people to evacuate. The evacuation orders have now been lifted in many areas. A risk trade-off analysis between benefits and risk associated with returning home would help in evaluating the justification for the lifting of the evacuation order in the aftermath of a nuclear disaster. Here, we performed a risk trade-off analysis among people returning home after the lifting of an evacuation order between an increase in emotional happiness (positive effect) and loss of life expectancy due to additional radiation exposure (negative effect), using a happy life expectancy (HpLE) indicator. Emotional happiness was estimated using questionnaires distributed among the affected people who lived in municipalities where evacuation orders were lifted. Loss of life expectancy was estimated under a scenario that returnees received 20 mSv in the year of return and subsequent radiation exposure. Increase in emotional happiness due to returning home was ~1-2 orders of magnitude higher among women aged 20, 40 and 65 years than the loss of life expectancy due to additional radiation exposure. This finding has implications for the justification for the lifting of evacuation orders.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fukushima nuclear disaster; ethics; happy life expectancy; risk comparison; risk trade-off

Year:  2021        PMID: 33978180      PMCID: PMC8114204          DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rraa109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  16 in total

1.  Screening for serious mental illness in the general population.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Peggy R Barker; Lisa J Colpe; Joan F Epstein; Joseph C Gfroerer; Eva Hiripi; Mary J Howes; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Ronald W Manderscheid; Ellen E Walters; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2003-02

Review 2.  Social and ethical issues in environmental remediation projects.

Authors:  D H Oughton
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

4.  Psychological health status among former residents of Tomioka, Fukushima Prefecture and their intention to return 8 years after the disaster at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.

Authors:  Makiko Orita; Keisuke Mori; Yasuyuki Taira; Yumiko Yamada; Masaharu Maeda; Noboru Takamura
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  The global burden of disease in 1990: summary results, sensitivity analysis and future directions.

Authors:  C J Murray; A D Lopez; D T Jamison
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors, Report 14, 1950-2003: an overview of cancer and noncancer diseases.

Authors:  Kotaro Ozasa; Yukiko Shimizu; Akihiko Suyama; Fumiyoshi Kasagi; Midori Soda; Eric J Grant; Ritsu Sakata; Hiromi Sugiyama; Kazunori Kodama
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Lower Psychological Distress Levels among Returnees Compared with Evacuees after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.

Authors:  Michio Murakami; Yoshitake Takebayashi; Masaharu Tsubokura
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Predicted cancer risks induced by computed tomography examinations during childhood, by a quantitative risk assessment approach.

Authors:  Neige Journy; Sophie Ancelet; Jean-Luc Rehel; Myriam Mezzarobba; Bernard Aubert; Dominique Laurier; Marie-Odile Bernier
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Was the Risk from Nursing-Home Evacuation after the Fukushima Accident Higher than the Radiation Risk?

Authors:  Michio Murakami; Kyoko Ono; Masaharu Tsubokura; Shuhei Nomura; Tomoyoshi Oikawa; Tosihiro Oka; Masahiro Kami; Taikan Oki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Importance of risk comparison for individual and societal decision-making after the Fukushima disaster.

Authors:  Michio Murakami
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.724

View more
  1 in total

1.  Subjective Wellbeing and Related Factors of Older Adults Nine and a Half Years after the Great East Japan Earthquake: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Coastal Area of Soma City.

Authors:  Yuri Kinoshita; Chihiro Nakayama; Naomi Ito; Nobuaki Moriyama; Hajime Iwasa; Seiji Yasumura
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.