Literature DB >> 33977528

Analysis of waveform and amplitude of mouse rod and cone flash responses.

Annia Abtout1, Gordon Fain2,3, Jürgen Reingruber1.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: Most vertebrate eyes have rod and cone photoreceptors, which use a signal transduction pathway consisting of many biological processes to transform light into an electrical response. We dissect and quantify the contribution of each of these processes to the photoreceptor light response by using a novel method of analysis that provides an analytical solution for the entire time course of the dim-flash light response. We find that the shape of the light response is exclusively controlled by deactivation parameters. Activation parameters scale this shape and alter the response amplitude. We show that the rising phase of the response depends on Ca2+ feedback, and we identify the deactivation parameters that control the recovery phase of the response. We devise new methods to extract values for deactivation and activation parameters from a separate analysis of response shape and response amplitude. ABSTRACT: Vertebrate eyes have rod and cone photoreceptors, which use a complex transduction pathway comprising many biological processes to transform the absorption of light into an electrical response. A fundamental question in sensory transduction is how these processes contribute to the response. To study this question, we use a well-accepted phototransduction model, which we analyse with a novel method based on the log transform of the current. We derive an analytical solution that describes the entire time course of the photoreceptor response to dim flashes of light. We use this solution to dissect and quantify the contribution of each process to the response. We find that the entire dim-flash response is proportional to the flash intensity. By normalizing responses to unit amplitude, we define a waveform that is independent of the light intensity and characterizes the invariant shape of dim-flash responses. We show that this waveform is exclusively determined by deactivation rates; activation rates only scale the waveform and affect the amplitude. This analysis corrects a previous assumption that the rising phase is determined entirely by activation rates. We further show that the rising phase depends on Ca2+ feedback to the cyclase, contrary to current belief. We identify the deactivation rates that control the recovery phase of the response, and we devise new methods to extract activation and deactivation rates from an analysis of response shape and response amplitude. In summary, we provide a comprehensive understanding of how the various transduction processes produce the cellular response.
© 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2021 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cone; mathematical model; photoreceptor; retina; rod; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33977528      PMCID: PMC8259453          DOI: 10.1113/JP281225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   6.228


  54 in total

1.  Longitudinal diffusion in retinal rod and cone outer segment cytoplasm: the consequence of cell structure.

Authors:  David Holcman; Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Speed, sensitivity, and stability of the light response in rod and cone photoreceptors: facts and models.

Authors:  Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 21.198

3.  Estimating the rate constant of cyclic GMP hydrolysis by activated phosphodiesterase in photoreceptors.

Authors:  Jürgen Reingruber; David Holcman
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  The magnitude, time course and spatial distribution of current induced in salamander rods by cyclic guanine nucleotides.

Authors:  D A Cameron; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Molecular origin of continuous dark noise in rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  F Rieke; D A Baylor
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Amplification and kinetics of the activation steps in phototransduction.

Authors:  E N Pugh; T D Lamb
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1993-03-01

7.  Transducin translocation contributes to rod survival and enhances synaptic transmission from rods to rod bipolar cells.

Authors:  Anurima Majumder; Johan Pahlberg; Kimberly K Boyd; Vasily Kerov; Saravanan Kolandaivelu; Visvanathan Ramamurthy; Alapakkam P Sampath; Nikolai O Artemyev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Functional comparison of RGS9 splice isoforms in a living cell.

Authors:  Kirill A Martemyanov; Claudia M Krispel; Polina V Lishko; Marie E Burns; Vadim Y Arshavsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Light-dependent delay in the falling phase of the retinal rod photoresponse.

Authors:  D R Pepperberg; M C Cornwall; M Kahlert; K P Hofmann; J Jin; G J Jones; H Ripps
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Modulation of mouse rod photoreceptor responses by Grb14 protein.

Authors:  Michael L Woodruff; Ammaji Rajala; Gordon L Fain; Raju V S Rajala
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reproducibility of the Rod Photoreceptor Response Depends Critically on the Concentration of the Phosphodiesterase Effector Enzyme.

Authors:  Ala Morshedian; Gabriela Sendek; Sze Yin Ng; Kimberly Boyd; Roxana A Radu; Mingyao Liu; Nikolai O Artemyev; Alapakkam P Sampath; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.709

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.