Jamila L Kwarteng1, L Matthews2, A Banerjee3, L K Sharp4, B S Gerber5, M R Stolley2. 1. Division of Community Health, Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. jkwarteng@mcw.edu. 2. Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 3. Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 4. Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 5. Division of Academic Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether stressful life events were associated with weight loss, central adiposity, and health behavior changes of African American breast cancer survivors (AABCS) participating in a weight loss intervention. METHODS: We conducted a secondary-data analyses of Moving Forward, a weight loss efficacy trial for AABCS conducted in 2011-2014. Two-hundred forty-six eligible women were randomized to a 6-month interventionist-guided (IG) or self-guided (SG) weight loss intervention. Data was collected on height, weight, self-reported diet, and self-reported physical activity. Stress (e.g., financial, legal, employment, relationships, safety, prejudice) was measured using an abbreviated version of the Crisis in Family Systems (CRISYS) urban life stress measure. Generalized linear models stratified by group examined the degree to which stress was associated with weight loss or changes in central adiposity, physical activity, and diet during the intervention (Months 1-6) or maintenance (Months 7 to 12) phases. RESULTS: Participants reported a median of 3.0 life stressors (range 0 to 22) mostly relating to relationships, safety concerns, and financial problems. In the IG group during the intervention phase, exposure to life stressors was not associated with weight loss (p = 0.15) or change in central adiposity (p = 0.69), physical activity (p = 0.15), or diet (p = 0.26). We found similar associations for the maintenance phase and in the SG group. CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS: Despite facing stress across a myriad of domains (e.g., relationships, safety, finances), AABCS were successful at initiating and maintaining behaviors to achieve weight loss, reductions in central adiposity, and behavioral changes. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted that include more strategies to address the challenges that AABCS face, to determine whether AABCS in particular might benefit from interventions that address barriers (e.g., stress management) to weight loss. Such strategies are critical for improving quality of life and lowering the risk of cancer recurrence.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether stressful life events were associated with weight loss, central adiposity, and health behavior changes of African American breast cancer survivors (AABCS) participating in a weight loss intervention. METHODS: We conducted a secondary-data analyses of Moving Forward, a weight loss efficacy trial for AABCS conducted in 2011-2014. Two-hundred forty-six eligible women were randomized to a 6-month interventionist-guided (IG) or self-guided (SG) weight loss intervention. Data was collected on height, weight, self-reported diet, and self-reported physical activity. Stress (e.g., financial, legal, employment, relationships, safety, prejudice) was measured using an abbreviated version of the Crisis in Family Systems (CRISYS) urban life stress measure. Generalized linear models stratified by group examined the degree to which stress was associated with weight loss or changes in central adiposity, physical activity, and diet during the intervention (Months 1-6) or maintenance (Months 7 to 12) phases. RESULTS: Participants reported a median of 3.0 life stressors (range 0 to 22) mostly relating to relationships, safety concerns, and financial problems. In the IG group during the intervention phase, exposure to life stressors was not associated with weight loss (p = 0.15) or change in central adiposity (p = 0.69), physical activity (p = 0.15), or diet (p = 0.26). We found similar associations for the maintenance phase and in the SG group. CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS: Despite facing stress across a myriad of domains (e.g., relationships, safety, finances), AABCS were successful at initiating and maintaining behaviors to achieve weight loss, reductions in central adiposity, and behavioral changes. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted that include more strategies to address the challenges that AABCS face, to determine whether AABCS in particular might benefit from interventions that address barriers (e.g., stress management) to weight loss. Such strategies are critical for improving quality of life and lowering the risk of cancer recurrence.
Authors: SeonYoon Chung; Shijun Zhu; Erika Friedmann; Catherine Kelleher; Adriane Kozlovsky; Karen W Macfarlane; Katherine H R Tkaczuk; Alice S Ryan; Kathleen A Griffith Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jennifer A Ligibel; Catherine M Alfano; Kerry S Courneya; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Robert A Burger; Rowan T Chlebowski; Carol J Fabian; Ayca Gucalp; Dawn L Hershman; Melissa M Hudson; Lee W Jones; Madhuri Kakarala; Kirsten K Ness; Janette K Merrill; Dana S Wollins; Clifford A Hudis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Zora Djuric; Josephine Mirasolo; LaVern Kimbrough; Diane R Brown; Lance K Heilbrun; Lisa Canar; Raghu Venkatranamamoorthy; Michael S Simon Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 1.798