Literature DB >> 33972990

Outcome of microscopically non-radical oesophagectomy for oesophageal and oesophagogastric junctional cancer: nationwide cohort study.

P Hollertz1,2, M Lindblad3,4, P Sandström1, I Halldestam1, D Edholm1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microscopically non-radical (R1) oesophageal cancer resection has been associated with worse survival. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for R1 resection and to investigate how this affects long-term survival.
METHODS: The Swedish National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer was used to identify all patients who underwent oesophageal cancer resection with curative intent between 2006 and 2017. Risk factors for R1 resection were assessed by multivariable logistic regression analysis, and factors predicting 5-year survival identified by multivariable Cox regression.
RESULTS: The study included 1460 patients. Surgical margins were involved microscopically in 142 patients (9.7 per cent). The circumferential resection margin was involved in 114 (7.8 per cent), the proximal margin in 53 (3.6 per cent), and the distal margin in 29 (2.0 per cent). In 30 specimens (2.1 per cent), two or all three margins were involved. Independent risk factors for R1 resection were male sex, low BMI, absence of neoadjuvant treatments, and clinical T4 disease. The 5-year survival rate for the entire cohort was 42.2 per cent, but only 18.0 per cent for those who had an R1 resection. Independent risk factors for death within 5 years of resection were male sex, age above 60 years, normal BMI, ASA fitness grade III, intermediate-level education, R1 resection (hazard ratio 1.80, 95 per cent c.i. 1.40 to 2.32), clinical T3 disease, and clinical lymph node metastasis.
CONCLUSION: R1 resection is common and predicts poor 5-year survival. Absence of neoadjuvant treatment is a risk factor for R1 resection.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33972990      PMCID: PMC8110895          DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJS Open        ISSN: 2474-9842


  25 in total

1.  What is the optimal distal resection margin for esophageal carcinoma?

Authors:  A G Casson; S J Darnton; S Subramanian; L Hiller
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Carcinoma of thoracic oesophagus and cardia. A review of 405 cases.

Authors:  C MILLER
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Prognostic significance of a positive radial margin after esophageal cancer resection.

Authors:  Sebastien Gilbert; Andre B Martel; Andrew J Seely; Donna E Maziak; Farid M Shamji; Sudhir R Sundaresan; P James Villeneuve
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  The multidisciplinary team meeting improves staging accuracy and treatment selection for gastro-esophageal cancer.

Authors:  A R Davies; D A C Deans; I Penman; J N Plevris; J Fletcher; L Wall; H Phillips; H Gilmour; D Patel; A de Beaux; S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  Modifiable factors and esophageal cancer: a systematic review of published meta-analyses.

Authors:  Clara Castro; Bárbara Peleteiro; Nuno Lunet
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 6.  Does the Margin Matter in Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Karl-Frederick Karstens; Jakob R Izbicki; Matthias Reeh
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.588

7.  Prognostic value of the circumferential resection margin and its definitions in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  L Depypere; J Moons; T Lerut; G De Hertogh; C Peters; X Sagaert; W Coosemans; H Van Veer; P Nafteux
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.429

8.  Assessment of criteria and clinical significance of circumferential resection margins in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Matthew Deeter; Russell Dorer; Madhan Kumar Kuppusamy; Richard P Koehler; Donald E Low
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-07

9.  Prognostic Value of the Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  J B Hulshoff; Z Faiz; A Karrenbeld; G Kats-Ugurlu; J G M Burgerhof; J K Smit; J Th M Plukker
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Complications and survival after hybrid and fully minimally invasive oesophagectomy.

Authors:  M M K Veenstra; B M Smithers; E Visser; D Edholm; S Brosda; J M Thomas; D C Gotley; I G Thomson; B P L Wijnhoven; A P Barbour
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.