Literature DB >> 17069595

The multidisciplinary team meeting improves staging accuracy and treatment selection for gastro-esophageal cancer.

A R Davies1, D A C Deans, I Penman, J N Plevris, J Fletcher, L Wall, H Phillips, H Gilmour, D Patel, A de Beaux, S Paterson-Brown.   

Abstract

The object of this article is to assess current staging accuracies for individual modalities and to investigate the influence of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) on clinical staging accuracies and treatment selection for patients with gastro-esophageal cancer. Patients newly diagnosed with gastric or esophageal cancer and who were deemed suitable for surgical resection by the MDT were studied. Patients were staged with a combination of computerized tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS). Additionally, the MDT determined an overall clinical stage for each patient after discussion at the MDT meeting. Treatments were selected according to this final clinical stage. Final histopathological staging (pTNM) was available for all patients and was used as the gold standard for determining staging accuracy. Suitability of treatment selection was assessed once final pTNM was available. One hundred and eighteen patients were studied. Endoscopic ultrasound was the most accurate individual staging modality for the loco-regional assessment of esophageal tumors (T stage accuracy 78%, N stage accuracy 70%). Laparoscopic ultrasound was the most accurate modality in T staging of gastric cancers (91%). The MDT stage was more accurate than each individual staging modality for T and N staging for both gastric and esophageal cancers (accuracy range: 88-89%) and was better for the assessment of nodal disease than each individual modality (CT P < 0.001, EUS P < 0.01, LUS P < 0.01). Overall staging accuracy as determined at the MDT meeting was increased and resulted in only 2/118 (2%) patients being under-treated. The MDT significantly improves staging accuracy for gastro-esophageal cancer and ensures that correct management decisions are made for the highest number of individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17069595     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00629.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  50 in total

1.  Implementing effective and sustainable multidisciplinary clinical thoracic oncology programs.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Richard K Freeman; Mark J Krasna
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

2.  Section I: essentials of ensuring excellence in cancer care.

Authors:  Richard M Goldberg; John L Marshall; Lisa A Kachnic; Alan P Venook
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2007-11

3.  Multidisciplinary management of cancer patients: chasing a shadow or real value? An overview of the literature.

Authors:  J M Croke; S El-Sayed
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Argon plasma coagulation compared with stent placement in the palliative treatment of inoperable oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Dimitrios E Sigounas; Christoforos Krystallis; Graeme Couper; Simon Paterson-Brown; Athina Tatsioni; John N Plevris
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 5.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Donald E Low; William Allum; Giovanni De Manzoni; Lorenzo Ferri; Arul Immanuel; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Simon Law; Mats Lindblad; Nick Maynard; Joseph Neal; C S Pramesh; Mike Scott; B Mark Smithers; Valérie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Trends of Clinician Adherence to Evidence-Based Recommendations for Multidisciplinary Oncology Care for Patients With Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  John G Aversa; Laurence P Diggs; Brendan L Hagerty; Dana A Dominguez; Timothy Wiemken; Carrie Luu; Jonathan M Hernandez
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 7.  Integration of tobacco cessation services into multidisciplinary lung cancer care: rationale, state of the art, and future directions.

Authors:  Graham W Warren; Kenneth D Ward
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

Review 8.  Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer.

Authors:  Simone Mocellin; Sandro Pasquali
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-06

9.  Prospective comparison of optic versus blind endoscopic ultrasound in staging esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; Wyn G Lewis; Xavier Escofet; David Bosanquet; S Ashley Roberts
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The oncosurgery approach to managing liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary international consensus.

Authors:  René Adam; Aimery De Gramont; Joan Figueras; Ashley Guthrie; Norihiro Kokudo; Francis Kunstlinger; Evelyne Loyer; Graeme Poston; Philippe Rougier; Laura Rubbia-Brandt; Alberto Sobrero; Josep Tabernero; Catherine Teh; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.