Literature DB >> 33971528

Oversampling of minority categories drives misperceptions of group compositions.

Mel W Khaw1, Rachel Kranton2, Scott Huettel3.   

Abstract

The ability to estimate proportions informs our immediate impressions of social environments (e.g., of the diversity of races or genders within a crowded room). This study examines how the distribution of attention during brief glances shapes estimates of group gender proportions. Performance-wise, subjects exhibit a canonical pattern of judgment errors: small proportions are overestimated while large values are underestimated. Subjects' eye movements at sub-second timescales reveal that these biases follow from a tendency to visually oversample members of the gender minority. Rates of oversampling dovetail with average levels of error magnitudes, response variability, and response times. Visual biases are thus associated with the inherent difficulty in estimating particular proportions. All results are replicated at a within-subjects level with non-human ensembles using natural scene stimuli; the observed attentional patterns and judgment biases are thus not exclusively guided by face-specific visual properties. Our results reveal the biased distribution of attention underlying typical judgment errors of group proportions.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ensemble perception; Overestimation; Proportion estimation; Social perception

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33971528      PMCID: PMC8628853          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  31 in total

1.  Bias in proportion judgments: the cyclical power model.

Authors:  J G Hollands; B P Dyre
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; S Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data.

Authors:  Debbie S Ma; Joshua Correll; Bernd Wittenbrink
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-12

4.  Individuation of multiple targets during visual enumeration: new insights from electrophysiology.

Authors:  Silvia Pagano; Veronica Mazza
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Perceiving crowd attention: ensemble perception of a crowd's gaze.

Authors:  Timothy D Sweeny; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-08-14

Review 6.  Bias and ignorance in demographic perception.

Authors:  D Landy; B Guay; T Marghetis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

7.  Response scales and sequential effects in judgment.

Authors:  M C King; G R Lockhead
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-12

8.  Attending to Threat: Race-based Patterns of Selective Attention.

Authors:  Sophie Trawalter; Andrew R Todd; Abigail A Baird; Jennifer A Richeson
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-09

9.  Stimulus saliency modulates pre-attentive processing speed in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Michael Zehetleitner; Klaus Gramann; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Temporal brain dynamics of multiple object processing: the flexibility of individuation.

Authors:  Veronica Mazza; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Minority salience and the overestimation of individuals from minority groups in perception and memory.

Authors:  Rasha Kardosh; Asael Y Sklar; Alon Goldstein; Yoni Pertzov; Ran R Hassin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.