Literature DB >> 339710

Evaluation of a multitest system for identification of saccharolytic pseudomonads.

M J Morris, V M Young, M R Moody.   

Abstract

The API-20 Enteric Strip has been proposed to have the capacity to differentiate the nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli. This multitest strip serves as the basis of an evolving system, which first provided a Register, then a Selector, and more recently a computer Index. Twenty-three strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and P. putida, 21 of P. fluorescens, 27 of P. maltophilia, and 33 of P. cepacia were investigated by duplicate test runs to determine reproducibility. The results were then evaluated at each of the three stages to determine accuracy of identification and the effect of the system evolution on the identification rate. Seventy-one of the 127 pseudomonads gave reproducible results in the multitest strips. Approximately half of them were correctly grouped or speciated by the Register, whereas 80 to 83% were similarly identified by both the Selector and Index. Of the clinically important pseudomonads, 61 to 65% of P. aeruginosa and 93% of P. maltophilia strains were correctly speciated; neither P. putida nor P. fluorescens strains were speciated, although most were correctly grouped. P. cepacia was speciated by the Index with only 55 to 58% accuracy. Although the present stage of the evolving system offers improvement over the Register, further modifications are needed to eliminate identification problems and to increase speciation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 339710     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/69.1.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  9 in total

1.  Nonfermentative bacilli: evaluation of three systems for identification.

Authors:  L A Otto; U Blachman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Identification of Pseudomonas pseudomallei in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  L R Ashdown
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Critical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system gram-negative identification card for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods.

Authors:  J J Plorde; J A Gates; L G Carlson; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the MicroScan Urinary Combo Panel and API 20E system for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli isolated from clinical veterinary materials.

Authors:  J J Mathewson; R B Simpson; F L Brooks
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Accuracy of a rapid carbohydrate oxidation microtube method for identification of nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  S M Qadri; D L Carr; R Narayanan; J Ottman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Four methods for identification of gram-negative nonfermenting rods: organisms more commonly encountered in clinical specimens.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; J Stavitz; M S Bentz; L C von Kuster
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by pyocyanin production on Tech agar.

Authors:  E A Reyes; M J Bale; W H Cannon; J M Matsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of the rapid NFT system for identification of gram-negative, nonfermenting rods.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; D J Leathers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  How microbiological tests reflect bacterial pathogenesis and host adaptation.

Authors:  Luisella Spiga; Angel G Jimenez; Renato L Santos; Sebastian E Winter
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.214

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.