Lisa Y Law1, Stephen P Uong2, Hyma T Vempaty3, Vu H Nguyen4, David Baer4, Vincent X Liu2, Lisa J Herrinton2. 1. Department of Oncology, Roseville Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Roseville, CA. 2. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA. 3. Department of Oncology, Santa Clara Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Santa Clara, CA. 4. Department of Oncology, Oakland Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Regionalization of care for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has not been described for community-based settings. In 2015, we shifted AML induction from 21 local centers to 3 regional centers. METHODS: Using time-specific inception cohorts, we assessed whether regionalization was associated with the frequency of use of induction therapy, receipt of bone marrow transplantation, 60-day mortality (treatment toxicity), and 180-day mortality (treatment effectiveness). Information for all adult patients diagnosed with AML from 2013 to 2017 was obtained from the electronic health record. Multivariable methods were used to estimate the adjusted associations of induction, bone marrow transplantation, and death in relation to year of diagnosis before and after regionalization. RESULTS: Of 661 patients diagnosed during 2013 to 2017, 53% were ≥ 70 years, 22% were ≥ 80 years, and 10% died within the week following diagnosis. Comparing 2017 with 2013, the proportion of patients who received induction therapy increased 2.88 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.55-5.35), and the proportion of non-acute promyelocytic leukemia patients receiving bone marrow transplantation increased 2.00 times (95% CI = 0.89-4.50). Regionalization was associated with lower 180-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.44-0.92), whereas change in 60-day mortality was not statistically significant (HR = 0.67; 95%CI = 0.43-1.04). CONCLUSION: In this community-based population, many patients were of advanced age yet benefitted from AML induction therapy delivered at a regionally specialized center. These early results suggest the benefit of regionalizing subspecialty leukemia care.
INTRODUCTION: Regionalization of care for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has not been described for community-based settings. In 2015, we shifted AML induction from 21 local centers to 3 regional centers. METHODS: Using time-specific inception cohorts, we assessed whether regionalization was associated with the frequency of use of induction therapy, receipt of bone marrow transplantation, 60-day mortality (treatment toxicity), and 180-day mortality (treatment effectiveness). Information for all adult patients diagnosed with AML from 2013 to 2017 was obtained from the electronic health record. Multivariable methods were used to estimate the adjusted associations of induction, bone marrow transplantation, and death in relation to year of diagnosis before and after regionalization. RESULTS: Of 661 patients diagnosed during 2013 to 2017, 53% were ≥ 70 years, 22% were ≥ 80 years, and 10% died within the week following diagnosis. Comparing 2017 with 2013, the proportion of patients who received induction therapy increased 2.88 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.55-5.35), and the proportion of non-acute promyelocytic leukemia patients receiving bone marrow transplantation increased 2.00 times (95% CI = 0.89-4.50). Regionalization was associated with lower 180-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.44-0.92), whereas change in 60-day mortality was not statistically significant (HR = 0.67; 95%CI = 0.43-1.04). CONCLUSION: In this community-based population, many patients were of advanced age yet benefitted from AML induction therapy delivered at a regionally specialized center. These early results suggest the benefit of regionalizing subspecialty leukemia care.
Authors: Edna Cheung; Anthony J Perissinotti; Dale L Bixby; Patrick W Burke; Kristen M Pettit; Lydia L Benitez; Julia Brown; Gianni B Scappaticci; Bernard L Marini Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 3.673
Authors: Patricia Kipnis; Benjamin J Turk; David A Wulf; Juan Carlos LaGuardia; Vincent Liu; Matthew M Churpek; Santiago Romero-Brufau; Gabriel J Escobar Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Kelsey Lau; Aitua Salami; Gala Barden; Shumaila Khawja; Diana L Castillo; Victoria Poppelaars; Avo Artinyan; Samir S Awad; David H Berger; Daniel Albo; Daniel A Anaya Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Gwendolyn Ho; Ted Wun; Lori Muffly; Qian Li; Ann Brunson; Aaron S Rosenberg; Brian A Jonas; Theresa H M Keegan Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 6.921