| Literature DB >> 30666431 |
Edna Cheung1, Anthony J Perissinotti1, Dale L Bixby2, Patrick W Burke2, Kristen M Pettit2, Lydia L Benitez1, Julia Brown1, Gianni B Scappaticci1, Bernard L Marini3.
Abstract
Secondary AML is associated with a disproportionately poor prognosis, consistently shown to exhibit inferior response rates, event-free survival, and overall survival in comparison with de novo AML. Secondary AML may arise from the evolution of an antecedent hematologic disorder, or it may arise as a complication of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy in the case of therapy-related AML. Because of the high frequency of poor-risk cytogenetics and high-risk molecular features, such as alterations in TP53, leukemic clones are often inherently chemoresistant. Standard of care induction had long remained conventional 7 + 3 until its reformulation as CPX-351, recently FDA approved specifically for secondary AML. However, recent data also suggests relatively favorable outcomes with regimens based on high-dose cytarabine or hypomethylating agents. With several investigational agents being studied, the therapeutic landscape becomes even more complex, and the treatment approach involves patient-specific, disease-specific, and therapy-specific considerations.Entities:
Keywords: AML with myelodysplasia-related changes; FLAG; Hypomethylating agents; Liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine; Secondary AML; Therapy-related AML
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30666431 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-019-03606-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Hematol ISSN: 0939-5555 Impact factor: 3.673