OBJECTIVES: The relationship between wisdom and fluid intelligence (Gf) is poorly understood, particularly in older adults. We empirically tested the magnitude of the correlation between wisdom and Gf to help determine the extent of overlap between these two constructs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with preregistered hypotheses and well-powered analytic plan (https://osf.io/h3pjx). SETTING: Memory and Aging Center at the University of California San Francisco, located in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: 141 healthy older adults (mean age = 76 years; 56% female). MEASUREMENTS: Wisdom was quantified using a well-validated self-report-based scale (San Diego Wisdom Scale or SD-WISE). Gf was assessed via composite measures of processing speed (Gf-PS) and executive functioning (Gf-EF). The relationships of SD-WISE scores to Gf-PS and Gf-EF were tested in bivariate correlational analyses and multiple regression models adjusted for demographics (age, sex, and education). Exploratory analyses evaluated the relationships between SD-WISE and age, episodic memory performance, and dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortical volumes on magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Wisdom showed a small, positive association with Gf-EF (r = 0.181 [95% CI 0.016, 0.336], p = .031), which was reduced to nonsignificance upon controlling for demographics, and no association with Gf-PS (r = 0.019 [95% CI -0.179, 0.216], p = .854). Wisdom demonstrated a small, negative correlation with age (r = -0.197 [95% CI -0.351, -0.033], p = .019), but was not significantly related to episodic memory or prefrontal volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that most of the variance in wisdom (>95%) is unaccounted for by Gf. The independence of wisdom from cognitive functions that reliably show age-associated declines suggests that it may hold unique potential to bolster decision-making, interpersonal functioning, and other everyday activities in older adults.
OBJECTIVES: The relationship between wisdom and fluid intelligence (Gf) is poorly understood, particularly in older adults. We empirically tested the magnitude of the correlation between wisdom and Gf to help determine the extent of overlap between these two constructs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with preregistered hypotheses and well-powered analytic plan (https://osf.io/h3pjx). SETTING: Memory and Aging Center at the University of California San Francisco, located in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: 141 healthy older adults (mean age = 76 years; 56% female). MEASUREMENTS: Wisdom was quantified using a well-validated self-report-based scale (San Diego Wisdom Scale or SD-WISE). Gf was assessed via composite measures of processing speed (Gf-PS) and executive functioning (Gf-EF). The relationships of SD-WISE scores to Gf-PS and Gf-EF were tested in bivariate correlational analyses and multiple regression models adjusted for demographics (age, sex, and education). Exploratory analyses evaluated the relationships between SD-WISE and age, episodic memory performance, and dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortical volumes on magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Wisdom showed a small, positive association with Gf-EF (r = 0.181 [95% CI 0.016, 0.336], p = .031), which was reduced to nonsignificance upon controlling for demographics, and no association with Gf-PS (r = 0.019 [95% CI -0.179, 0.216], p = .854). Wisdom demonstrated a small, negative correlation with age (r = -0.197 [95% CI -0.351, -0.033], p = .019), but was not significantly related to episodic memory or prefrontal volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that most of the variance in wisdom (>95%) is unaccounted for by Gf. The independence of wisdom from cognitive functions that reliably show age-associated declines suggests that it may hold unique potential to bolster decision-making, interpersonal functioning, and other everyday activities in older adults.
Authors: Michael L Thomas; Katherine J Bangen; Barton W Palmer; Averria Sirkin Martin; Julie A Avanzino; Colin A Depp; Danielle Glorioso; Rebecca E Daly; Dilip V Jeste Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Dilip V Jeste; Sarah A Graham; Ellen E Lee; Ho-Cheol Kim; Tanya T Nguyen; Colin A Depp Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Loes van Aken; Roy P C Kessels; Ellen Wingbermühle; William M van der Veld; Jos I M Egger Journal: Acta Neuropsychiatr Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 3.403
Authors: Deborah A Cahn-Weiner; Sarah Tomaszewski Farias; Laura Julian; Danielle J Harvey; Joel H Kramer; Bruce R Reed; Dan Mungas; Margaret Wetzel; Helena Chui Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2007-05-18 Impact factor: 2.892