Literature DB >> 33966149

Examining the Process of Implementing a Three-Step Mental Health and Wellbeing System of Care for Children and Adolescents Across Multiple Community Settings.

Allison M Waters1, Rachel A Sluis2, Lara J Farrell2, Caroline L Donovan2, Olivia M Elvin2, Nicolas Rossow3, Jeroen van den Muyzenberg3, Tiah L Dowell2, Katherine M Ryan2, Jules Finch2, Wayne Usher4, Kathryn L Modecki2, Melanie J Zimmer-Gembeck2, Susan H Spence2.   

Abstract

Mental health problems affect large numbers of young people. Integrated systems are required that can be applied in diverse settings to reach youth 'where they are'. We evaluated the process of implementing a three-step youth mental health and wellbeing system in diverse community settings according to three implementation outcomes: feasibility, penetration and acceptability. The study describes 49 applications of the 'Life-Fit-Learning system' designed to assess the mental health and wellbeing of youth (Assess step), provide feedback on assessment results (Reflect step), and connect them to resources and services proportionate to their needs (Connect step). Within a participatory research approach, 3798 administrations were conducted with youth between 9 and 18 years and 90 administrations were conducted with adults. Implementation was based on the four phases of the Quality Implementation Framework and was staged to integrate stakeholder and consumer feedback and experience gained from focus groups and two pilot phases before full implementation. Feasibility ratings of successful implementation ranged from 86.7 to 96.4% across applications and settings. High penetration rates were achieved. The Life-Fit-Learning system successfully reached 91.9% to 96% of youth with the Assess and Reflect steps and low intensity Connect step resources. Of those, 14.7% to 23% were identified at-risk for mental health problems and 93% to 97% of those at-risk youth additionally received Connect step co-delivered group-based programs (moderate intensity care) and/or individual treatment (high intensity care). Youth and parents reported high satisfaction across all steps and delivery modes. With strong collaboration, an integrated model of care can be delivered feasibly, effectively and satisfactorily to reach large numbers of young people across settings.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implementation; Integrated systems of care; Mental health; Wellbeing; Youth

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33966149     DOI: 10.1007/s10578-021-01184-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev        ISSN: 0009-398X


  11 in total

1.  Testing standard and modular designs for psychotherapy treating depression, anxiety, and conduct problems in youth: a randomized effectiveness trial.

Authors:  John R Weisz; Bruce F Chorpita; Lawrence A Palinkas; Sonja K Schoenwald; Jeanne Miranda; Sarah Kate Bearman; Eric L Daleiden; Ana M Ugueto; Anya Ho; Jacqueline Martin; Jane Gray; Alisha Alleyne; David A Langer; Michael A Southam-Gerow; Robert D Gibbons
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2011-11-07

Review 2.  Research Review: Can we justify the widespread dissemination of universal, school-based interventions for the prevention of depression among children and adolescents?

Authors:  Susan H Spence; Alison L Shortt
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 8.982

3.  Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.

Authors:  Enola Proctor; Hiie Silmere; Ramesh Raghavan; Peter Hovmand; Greg Aarons; Alicia Bunger; Richard Griffey; Melissa Hensley
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2011-03

4.  The prevention of anxiety and depression in children from disadvantaged schools.

Authors:  Clare M Roberts; Robert Kane; Brian Bishop; Donna Cross; Jamie Fenton; Bret Hart
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2009-09-06

5.  INTEGRATED MODELS OF SCHOOL-BASED PREVENTION: LOGIC AND THEORY.

Authors:  Celene E Domitrovich; Catherine P Bradshaw; Mark T Greenberg; Dennis Embry; Jeanne M Poduska; Nicholas S Ialongo
Journal:  Psychol Sch       Date:  2010-01

6.  How we design feasibility studies.

Authors:  Deborah J Bowen; Matthew Kreuter; Bonnie Spring; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Laura Linnan; Diane Weiner; Suzanne Bakken; Cecilia Patrick Kaplan; Linda Squiers; Cecilia Fabrizio; Maria Fernandez
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Difficult-to-treat pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: feasibility and preliminary results of a randomized pilot trial of D-cycloserine-augmented behavior therapy.

Authors:  Lara J Farrell; Allison M Waters; Mark J Boschen; Laetitia Hattingh; Harry McConnell; Ella L Milliner; Nigel Collings; Melanie Zimmer-Gembeck; Doug Shelton; Thomas H Ollendick; Chris Testa; Eric A Storch
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 6.505

8.  Long-term outcomes for the Child STEPs randomized effectiveness trial: a comparison of modular and standard treatment designs with usual care.

Authors:  Bruce F Chorpita; John R Weisz; Eric L Daleiden; Sonja K Schoenwald; Lawrence A Palinkas; Jeanne Miranda; Charmaine K Higa-McMillan; Brad J Nakamura; A Aukahi Austin; Cameo F Borntrager; Alyssa Ward; Karen C Wells; Robert D Gibbons
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2013-08-26

Review 9.  Integrated Mental Health Services for the Developmental Period (0 to 25 Years): A Critical Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Acceptability of screening for mental health difficulties in primary schools: a survey of UK parents.

Authors:  Emma Soneson; Jasmine Childs-Fegredo; Joanna K Anderson; Jan Stochl; Mina Fazel; Tamsin Ford; Ayla Humphrey; Peter B Jones; Emma Howarth
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.