Literature DB >> 33961334

Long-term shedding of viable SARS-CoV-2 in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19.

Ilies Benotmane1,2,3, Simone Risch2, Cécile Doderer-Lang4, Sophie Caillard1,3, Samira Fafi-Kremer2,3.   

Abstract

The exact duration of viable SARS-CoV-2 shedding in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) remains unclear. Here, we retrospectively investigated this issue using cell cultures of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive nasopharyngeal samples (n = 40) obtained from 16 KTRs with symptomatic COVID-19 up to 39 days from symptom onset. A length of viable SARS-CoV-2 shedding >3 weeks from the onset of symptoms was identified in four KTRs (25%). These results suggest that a significant proportion of KTRs can shed viable SARS-CoV-2 for at least 3 weeks, which may favor the emergence of new variants. Based on these data, we recommend prolonging the isolation of KTRs with COVID-19 until negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing.
© 2021 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical research/practice; complication: infectious; infection and infectious agents - viral; infectious disease; kidney transplantation/nephrology; translational research/science

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33961334      PMCID: PMC8222938          DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   9.369


calcineurin inhibitors coronavirus disease 2019 cycle threshold interquartile range kidney transplant recipients RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase ribonucleic acid reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction

INTRODUCTION

Immunocompetent individuals with non‐severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) may shed SARS‐CoV‐2 for up to 10 days. , Understanding whether immunocompromised kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with COVID‐19 may experience prolonged viral shedding has important public health implications, especially with respect to patient isolation. A previous study demonstrated that SARS‐CoV‐2 ribonucleic acid (RNA) was detectable for a longer period in nasopharyngeal swabs collected from KTRs than in those from immunocompetent individuals. However, the presence of SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA does not necessarily indicate that the virus is vital and infectious. As a result, limited data are available on the shedding dynamics of viable SARS‐CoV‐2 in KTRs. Here, we retrospectively investigated this issue using cell cultures of SARS‐CoV‐2 RT‐PCR‐positive nasopharyngeal samples (n = 40) obtained from 16 KTRs with symptomatic COVID‐19 up to 39 days from symptom onset.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

The study participants (n = 16) were retrospectively recruited from among adult KTRs who were hospitalized with symptomatic COVID‐19 at our transplant center between March 4 and April 15, 2020. All KTRs had an objectively confirmed diagnosis of COVID‐19 based on positive testing of nasopharyngeal swabs by reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR). KTRs who had at least two positive nasopharyngeal swabs (of which one collected at least 7 days after symptom onset) during the follow‐up period were deemed eligible. Patient data were extracted from medical records on admission and during follow‐up. Patients requiring high concentrations of oxygen (>6 L/min) or admitted to an intensive care unit were considered to have severe COVID‐19. The study protocol complied with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration and was granted ethical approval by the local Institutional Review Board (approval number: DC‐2013‐1990).

Reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction

Quantitative RT‐PCR testing for SARS‐CoV‐2 was carried out according to the COVID‐HUS study protocol (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04405726) using nasopharyngeal swabs obtained at admission and, subsequently, on a weekly basis until discharge. Thereafter, RT‐PCR testing was performed at 30 and 45 days (±7 days) from the onset of symptoms. We used an in‐house RT‐PCR‐based assay targeting two different regions of the RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene in accordance with the WHO technical guidance. Viral loads were quantified using the cycle threshold (Ct) values of the RdRp gene.

Cell infection and assessment of viral cytopathic effect

Viral cytopathic effect assays were performed using the Buffalo green monkey kidney (BGMK) cell line (ATCC; PTA‐4594). In brief, filtered SARS‐CoV‐2 RT‐PCR‐positive nasopharyngeal samples (50 µL) were added in duplicate to BGMK cells seeded in a 96‐well plate and cultured at 37°C for 72 h in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cultures were observed daily for cytopathic effects. On the third day, cells were fixed and probed with a recombinant rabbit anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 (2019‐nCoV) Spike S2 antibody (Interchim). Foci were counted on an AID ELIPSOT reader using the ELISPOT 8.0 software (AID Autoimmun Diagnostika GmbH) as previously described. All experiments were carried out in a biosafety level‐3 laboratory.

RESULTS

The study sample consisted of 16 KTR (88% men; median age: 63.3 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 54–68.7 years). The median body mass index was 24 kg/m2 (IQR: 23–30.8 kg/m2), whereas the median time elapsed from the date of transplantation to the diagnosis of COVID‐19 was 3.8 years (IQR: 1.6–7.2 years). With respect of immunosuppressive drugs, 13 (81.3%) and 14 (87.5%) patients received calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid, respectively. Inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin and steroids were given to 2 (12.5%) and 10 (62.5%) patients, respectively. Only two patients presented with severe COVID‐19. Clinical and demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1

Clinical and demographic characteristics, management of immunosuppression, and antiviral and immunomodulatory therapies of kidney transplant recipients (n = 16)

Entire cohort (n = 16)Viable SARS‐CoV−2 shedding <21 days (n = 12)Viable SARS‐CoV−2 shedding >21 days (n = 4)
Men14 (87.5%)11 (91.7%)3 (75%)
Age (years)63.3 (54–68.8)63.3 (57.3–68.7)58.4 (44.3–68.8)
Comorbidities
BMI (kg/m²)24 (23–30.8)26.5 (23–33)24 (22.5–24.3)
Cardiovascular disease6 (37.5%)5 (41.7%)1 (25%)
Respiratory disease6 (37.5%)5 (41.7%)1 (25%)
Diabetes6 (37.5%)5 (41.7%)1 (25%)
Hypertension13 (81.3%)11 (91.7%)2 (50%)
Interval from kidney transplantation (years)3.8 (1.6–7.2)4.9 (1.4–12.8)2.9 (1.8–3.8)
Antithymocyte globulin8 (50%)5 (41.7%)3 (75%)
Anti‐CD258 (50%)7 (58.3%)1 (25%)
Tacrolimus10 (62.5%)8 (66.7%)2 (50%)
Ciclosporin3 (18.8%)1 (8.3%)2 (50%)
MMF/MPA14 (87.5%)11 (91.7%)3 (75%)
mTOR inhibitors2 (12.5%)1 (8.3%)1 (25%)
Steroids10 (62.5%)6 (50%)4 (50%)
Belatacept2 (12.5%)2 (16.7%)0
Dyspnea9 (56.3%)8 (66.7%)1 (25%)
Cough12 (75%)9 (75%)3 (75%)
Fever15 (93.8%)11 (91.7%)4 (100%)
Myalgia10 (62.5%)7 (58.3%)3 (75%)
Headache6 (37.5%)4 (33.3%)2 (50%)
Diarrhea14 (87.5%)10 (83.3%)4 (100%)
SARS‐CoV−2 Ct a 25 (22–29)26 (23−30)20 (16–24)
CRP peak, mg/L46 (28.9–76.8)61.5 (43.7–95.5)24.8 (13.7–33.9)
Severe disease2 (12.5%)2 (16.7%)0
Lopinavir/ ritonavir1 (6.3%)1 (8.3%)0
Hydroxychloroquine8 (50%)5 (41.7%)3 (75%)
Tocilizumab2 (12.5%)2 (16.7%)0
CNI withdrawal4/13 (30.1%)3 (33.3%)1 (25%)
MMF/MPA withdrawal14/14 (100%)11 (100%)3 (100%)
mTORi withdrawal2/2 (100%)1 (100%)1 (100%)

Continuous variables are presented as medians (interquartile ranges), whereas categorical variables are presented as counts (percentages).

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CNI, calcineurin inhibitors; CRP, C‐reactive protein; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MPA, mycophenolic acid; mTORi, inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin.

SARS‐CoV‐2 cycle threshold measured in the nasopharyngeal swab obtained on admission.

Clinical and demographic characteristics, management of immunosuppression, and antiviral and immunomodulatory therapies of kidney transplant recipients (n = 16) Continuous variables are presented as medians (interquartile ranges), whereas categorical variables are presented as counts (percentages). Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CNI, calcineurin inhibitors; CRP, C‐reactive protein; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MPA, mycophenolic acid; mTORi, inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin. SARS‐CoV‐2 cycle threshold measured in the nasopharyngeal swab obtained on admission. From symptom onset until 38 days thereafter, we collected a median of two nasopharyngeal swabs per patient (IQR: 2–3.3). Viable SARS‐CoV‐2 shedding was identified in a total of 17 (42.5%) swabs and 9 (56.2%) KTRs showed at least one positive virus isolation. Most (9/16, 56.2%) samples collected within 10 days of symptom onset had positive viral cultures of SARS‐CoV‐2. Notably, a viable virus was detected in 8 of the 24 (33.3%) samples collected after at least 10 days from symptom onset. In addition, a length of viable SARS‐CoV‐2 shedding >3 weeks from the onset of symptoms was identified in four KTRs (25%; Figure 1, panels A and B). While none of these four patients had severe COVID‐19, high viral loads were noted in their nasopharyngeal swabs on admission (24, 21, 16, and 17 Ct), respectively; median in the remaining 12 patients: 26 Ct, IQR: 23−30 Ct. Moreover, they showed lower C‐reactive protein peak levels (36, 17, 5, 33 mg/L, respectively; median in the remaining 12 patients: 62 mg/L, IQR: 44−96 mg/L,) and had a trend toward lower lymphocyte counts before COVID‐19 (0.66, 0.85, 0.84, and 0.88 × 109/L, respectively; median in the remaining 12 patients: 1.16 × 109/L, IQR: 0.85−1.94 × 109/L,). Other patient characteristics in relation to viable SARS‐CoV‐2 shedding duration are summarized in Table 1.
FIGURE 1

Duration of viral shedding in kidney transplant recipients (n = 16). (A) Results of viral culture in relation to the days from symptom onset for each kidney transplant recipient. A total of 40 nasopharyngeal specimens from 16 recipients were analyzed. Each sample was tested with (1) an RT‐PCR‐based assay targeting two different regions of the RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene in accordance with the WHO technical guidance and (2) SARS‐CoV‐2 viral cell culture. Four patients (KTR6, KTR7, KTR8, and KTR11) were found to shed viable SARS‐CoV‐2 for at least 3 weeks from the onset of symptoms. (B) Presence (red dots) or absence (blue dots) of viable SARS‐CoV‐2 shedding (based on the results of viral culture) in relation to cycle threshold (CT) values and days after symptoms onset (DSO). KTR, kidney transplant recipient; RT‐PCR, reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2; WHO, World Health Organization [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Duration of viral shedding in kidney transplant recipients (n = 16). (A) Results of viral culture in relation to the days from symptom onset for each kidney transplant recipient. A total of 40 nasopharyngeal specimens from 16 recipients were analyzed. Each sample was tested with (1) an RT‐PCR‐based assay targeting two different regions of the RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene in accordance with the WHO technical guidance and (2) SARS‐CoV‐2 viral cell culture. Four patients (KTR6, KTR7, KTR8, and KTR11) were found to shed viable SARS‐CoV‐2 for at least 3 weeks from the onset of symptoms. (B) Presence (red dots) or absence (blue dots) of viable SARS‐CoV‐2 shedding (based on the results of viral culture) in relation to cycle threshold (CT) values and days after symptoms onset (DSO). KTR, kidney transplant recipient; RT‐PCR, reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2; WHO, World Health Organization [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

DISCUSSION

Using in vitro cell cultures, we demonstrate that a significant proportion of KTRs with COVID‐19 can have a prolonged SARS‐CoV‐2 shedding period. A positive cytopathic effect in cell cultures can be considered as a surrogate for the presence of a viable virus with infectious potential. Previous studies have shown that viral shedding in immunocompetent subjects is generally limited to less than 10 days from symptom onset, , although one report found a duration of up to 20 days. Another investigation suggested that the length of viral shedding in immunocompetent patients may be dependent on the severity of COVID‐19—being as high as 32 days in those with severe clinical manifestations. , Herein, we identified four KTRs with a shedding of viable SARS‐CoV‐2 longer than 3 weeks from symptom onset (up to 38 days). While none of these patients had severe COVID‐19, they showed higher viral loads in their nasopharyngeal swabs. Moreover, they had less severe inflammation—possibly as a result of a reduced immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2. In a patient with mild COVID‐19 who had recently undergone heart transplantation, Decker et al. identified viral shedding after 21 days from symptom onset. Another study conducted in 20 patients under immunosuppressive therapy for cancer reported prolonged viral shedding up to 61 days from the onset of symptoms. Currently, the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control guidelines for immunocompromised patients with COVID‐19 recommend discontinuing isolation in the following conditions: (1) clinical resolution of symptoms; (2) isolation for at least 20 days from the onset of symptoms; or (3) two consecutive negative SARS‐CoV‐2 RT‐PCR tests of respiratory specimens collected ≥24 h apart. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance regarding discontinuing transmission‐based precautions in this population maintains that isolation should end (1) 20 days after the symptoms first appeared, (2) at least 24 h have passed since last fever, and (3) when symptoms have improved. , Based on the current data, we believe that an extension of isolation precautions should be considered for KTRs. It is also possible that a prolonged shedding of viable SARS‐CoV‐2 in immunocompromised patients with a weak immunological pressure can lead to the emergence of viral variants. , , Surprisingly, we identified viable SARS‐CoV‐2 shedding in three cases characterized by low viral loads (Ct ≥ 35). While the presence of a viable virus generally shows an inverse relationship with Ct, this is not invariably the case. For example, a previous study demonstrated a successful viral propagation in 5 of 60 samples with Ct > 35, a finding which has been independently confirmed by another report (for 2 of the 74 specimens with Ct > 35). The presence of positive cultures in certain patients who had a low viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs is surprising. A potential explanation may lie in the presence of a low viral load in the upper respiratory tract coupled with a higher load in the lower tract. Alternatively, a sampling issue can be hypothesized. In conclusion, our results indicate that a significant proportion of KTRs can shed viable SARS‐CoV‐2 for at least 3 weeks. Based on these findings, we also suggest prolonging the isolation of KTRs with COVID‐19 in the following conditions: (1) until clinical resolution of symptoms and negative SARS‐CoV‐2 RT‐PCR testing of respiratory specimens or (2) after at least 30 days from symptom onset when RT‐PCR testing is not available. The main caveats of the current study include the limited sample size and the lack of data concerning viral variants; therefore, our findings require confirmation in independent investigations.

DISCLOSURE

The authors of this manuscript have conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation. Dr Caillard reports personal fees and non‐financial support from Novartis, nonfinancial support from Sanofi, and nonfinancial support from Astellas, unrelated to the current study. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
  13 in total

1.  Correlation Between 3790 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction-Positives Samples and Positive Cell Cultures, Including 1941 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Isolates.

Authors:  Rita Jaafar; Sarah Aherfi; Nathalie Wurtz; Clio Grimaldier; Thuan Van Hoang; Philippe Colson; Didier Raoult; Bernard La Scola
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  First dengue virus seroprevalence study on Madeira Island after the 2012 outbreak indicates unreported dengue circulation.

Authors:  Heidi Auerswald; Ana de Jesus; Gonçalo Seixas; Teresa Nazareth; Saraden In; Sokthearom Mao; Veasna Duong; Ana Clara Silva; Richard Paul; Philippe Dussart; Carla Alexandra Sousa
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Duration and key determinants of infectious virus shedding in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Kampen; David A M C van de Vijver; Pieter L A Fraaij; Bart L Haagmans; Mart M Lamers; Nisreen Okba; Johannes P C van den Akker; Henrik Endeman; Diederik A M P J Gommers; Jan J Cornelissen; Rogier A S Hoek; Menno M van der Eerden; Dennis A Hesselink; Herold J Metselaar; Annelies Verbon; Jurriaan E M de Steenwinkel; Georgina I Aron; Eric C M van Gorp; Sander van Boheemen; Jolanda C Voermans; Charles A B Boucher; Richard Molenkamp; Marion P G Koopmans; Corine Geurtsvankessel; Annemiek A van der Eijk
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 cell culture replication in respiratory samples from patients with severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Maria Dolores Folgueira; Joanna Luczkowiak; Fátima Lasala; Alfredo Pérez-Rivilla; Rafael Delgado
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  Shedding of Viable SARS-CoV-2 after Immunosuppressive Therapy for Cancer.

Authors:  Teresa Aydillo; Ana S Gonzalez-Reiche; Sadaf Aslam; Adriana van de Guchte; Zenab Khan; Ajay Obla; Jayeeta Dutta; Harm van Bakel; Judith Aberg; Adolfo García-Sastre; Gunjan Shah; Tobias Hohl; Genovefa Papanicolaou; Miguel-Angel Perales; Kent Sepkowitz; N Esther Babady; Mini Kamboj
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Persistence and Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in an Immunocompromised Host.

Authors:  Bina Choi; Manish C Choudhary; James Regan; Jeffrey A Sparks; Robert F Padera; Xueting Qiu; Isaac H Solomon; Hsiao-Hsuan Kuo; Julie Boucau; Kathryn Bowman; U Das Adhikari; Marisa L Winkler; Alisa A Mueller; Tiffany Y-T Hsu; Michaël Desjardins; Lindsey R Baden; Brian T Chan; Bruce D Walker; Mathias Lichterfeld; Manfred Brigl; Douglas S Kwon; Sanjat Kanjilal; Eugene T Richardson; A Helena Jonsson; Galit Alter; Amy K Barczak; William P Hanage; Xu G Yu; Gaurav D Gaiha; Michael S Seaman; Manuela Cernadas; Jonathan Z Li
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 shedding and mild course of COVID-19 in a patient after recent heart transplantation.

Authors:  Annegrit Decker; Markus Welzel; Katharina Laubner; Sebastian Grundmann; Georg Kochs; Marcus Panning; Robert Thimme; Christoph Bode; Dirk Wagner; Achim Lother
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 9.369

8.  In-depth virological assessment of kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Ilies Benotmane; Gabriela Gautier-Vargas; Marie-Josée Wendling; Peggy Perrin; Aurélie Velay; Xavier Bassand; Dimitri Bedo; Clément Baldacini; Mylène Sagnard; Dogan-Firat Bozman; Margaux Della-Chiesa; Morgane Solis; Floriane Gallais; Noëlle Cognard; Jérôme Olagne; Héloïse Delagrèverie; Louise Gontard; Baptiste Panaget; David Marx; Françoise Heibel; Laura Braun-Parvez; Bruno Moulin; Sophie Caillard; Samira Fafi-Kremer
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 9.369

9.  Duration of infectiousness and correlation with RT-PCR cycle threshold values in cases of COVID-19, England, January to May 2020.

Authors:  Anika Singanayagam; Monika Patel; Andre Charlett; Jamie Lopez Bernal; Vanessa Saliba; Joanna Ellis; Shamez Ladhani; Maria Zambon; Robin Gopal
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-08
View more
  11 in total

1.  Immunogenicity and Risk Factors Associated With Poor Humoral Immune Response of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Recipients of Solid Organ Transplant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kasama Manothummetha; Nipat Chuleerarux; Anawin Sanguankeo; Olivia S Kates; Nattiya Hirankarn; Achitpol Thongkam; M Veronica Dioverti-Prono; Pattama Torvorapanit; Nattapong Langsiri; Navaporn Worasilchai; Chatphatai Moonla; Rongpong Plongla; William M Garneau; Ariya Chindamporn; Pitchaphon Nissaisorakarn; Tany Thaniyavarn; Saman Nematollahi; Nitipong Permpalung
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-04-01

2.  Tacrolimus-resistant SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell products to prevent and treat severe COVID-19 in immunosuppressed patients.

Authors:  Lena Peter; Désirée Jacqueline Wendering; Stephan Schlickeiser; Henrike Hoffmann; Rebecca Noster; Dimitrios Laurin Wagner; Ghazaleh Zarrinrad; Sandra Münch; Samira Picht; Sarah Schulenberg; Hanieh Moradian; Mir-Farzin Mashreghi; Oliver Klein; Manfred Gossen; Toralf Roch; Nina Babel; Petra Reinke; Hans-Dieter Volk; Leila Amini; Michael Schmueck-Henneresse
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 6.698

Review 3.  An overview of COVID-19 in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Luther Bartelt; David van Duin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 13.310

4.  Life-threatening COVID-19 and aspergillosis co-infection in a heart transplant recipient: A cardiologist's nightmare.

Authors:  Renata Wachnicka-Truty; Bartosz Curyłło; Dagmara Wojtowicz; Dorota Kulawiak-Gałąska; Marcin Renke; Katarzyna Sikorska; Marcin Gruchała; Marek Koziński
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.737

5.  Duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding and infectivity in the working age population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alborz Rahmani; Guglielmo Dini; Veruscka Leso; Alfredo Montecucco; Bruno Kusznir Vitturi; Ivo Iavicoli; Paolo Durando
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.244

6.  Severe relapse of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a kidney transplant recipient with negative nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR after rituximab.

Authors:  Antoine Morel; Sandrine Imbeaud; Anne Scemla; Hélène Péré; Jacques Fourgeaud; Lucile Amrouche; Nicolas Robillard; Delphine Planas; Julien Puech; Sylvie Simon; Fanny Lanternier; Laurent Bélec; Julien Zuber; Olivier Schwartz; Dany Anglicheau; Nathalie Chavarot; David Veyer
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 9.369

7.  COVID-19 Vaccination and Remdesivir are Associated With Protection From New or Increased Levels of Donor-Specific Antibodies Among Kidney Transplant Recipients Hospitalized With COVID-19.

Authors:  John T Killian; Julie A Houp; Greer A Burkholder; Salomon A Roman Soto; A Cozette Killian; Song C Ong; Nathaniel B Erdmann; Paul A Goepfert; Vera Hauptfeld-Dolejsek; Sixto M Leal; Esther Zumaquero; Anoma Nellore; Gaurav Agarwal; Clifton E Kew; Babak J Orandi; Jayme E Locke; Paige M Porrett; Emily B Levitan; Vineeta Kumar; Frances E Lund
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.842

8.  Absence of Mortality Differences Between the First and Second COVID-19 Waves in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Bastien Berger; Marc Hazzan; Nassim Kamar; Hélène Francois; Marie Matignon; Clarisse Greze; Philippe Gatault; Luc Frimat; Pierre F Westeel; Valentin Goutaudier; Renaud Snanoudj; Charlotte Colosio; Antoine Sicard; Dominique Bertrand; Christiane Mousson; Jamal Bamoulid; Antoine Thierry; Dany Anglicheau; Lionel Couzi; Jonathan M Chemouny; Agnes Duveau; Valerie Moal; Yannick Le Meur; Gilles Blancho; Jérôme Tourret; Paolo Malvezzi; Christophe Mariat; Jean-Philippe Rerolle; Nicolas Bouvier; Sophie Caillard; Olivier Thaunat
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-09-21

9.  Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 in solid-organ transplant recipients: Incidence density and convalescent immunity prior to reinfection.

Authors:  Stephen Morris; Shweta Anjan; Suresh Pallikkuth; Paola Frattaroli; Steve Courel; Anmary Fernandez; Akina Natori; Lilian Abbo; Savita Pahwa; Giselle Guerra; Yoichiro Natori
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2022-04-06

10.  Humoral and cellular immune response and safety of two-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Victoria G Hall; Victor H Ferreira; Matthew Ierullo; Terrance Ku; Tina Marinelli; Beata Majchrzak-Kita; Anila Yousuf; Vathany Kulasingam; Atul Humar; Deepali Kumar
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 9.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.