| Literature DB >> 33956902 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: First-trimester pregnancy stage is the fastest developmental period of the fetus, in which all organs become well developed and need special care. Yet, many women make their first antenatal visit with the pregnancy already compromised due to fetomaternal complications. This study aimed to fill this dearth using the 2016 national representative data set to augment early antenatal care visits in Ethiopia.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33956902 PMCID: PMC8101713 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Percentage of study participants by their characteristics, median survival time, and log-rank test concerning the timing of the first ANC visit (n = 4666).
| Variable | Categories | Timing of first ANC | MST in months | Log Rank test p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st trimester | 2nd trimester | 3rd trimester | ||||
| Age | 15–19 | 92(5.10%) | 135(5.50%) | 21(5.10%) | 7 | <0.001 |
| 20–24 | 424(23.50%) | 509(20.80%) | 86(20.90%) | 6 | ||
| 25–34 | 935(51.90%) | 1251(51.00%) | 196(47.60%) | 7 | ||
| 35–49 | 350(34.40%) | 558(22.70%) | 109(26.50%) | 7 | ||
| Educational status | No education | 196(10.90%) | 106(4.30%) | 6(8.80%) | 9 | <0.001 |
| Primary | 265(14.70%) | 239(9.70%) | 13(3.20%) | 7 | ||
| Secondary | 614(34.10%) | 810(33.00%) | 109(26.50%) | 7 | ||
| Higher | 726(40.30%) | 1298(52.90%) | 284(68.90%) | 5 | ||
| Marital status | Never in union | 20(1.10%) | 20(0.80%) | 3(0.70%) | 8 | 0.02 |
| Currently in union/married | 1638(90.90%) | 2284(93.10%) | 389(94.10%) | 5 | ||
| Formerly in union | 143(7.90%) | 149(6.10%) | 20(4.90%) | 7 | ||
| Residence | Urban | 1024(56.90%) | 1897(77.30%) | 358(86.90%) | 5 | <0.001 |
| Rural | 777(43.10%) | 556(22.70%) | 54(13.10%) | 8 | ||
| Religion | Orthodox | 770(42.80%) | 921(37.50%) | 140(34.00%) | 5 | 0.01 |
| Catholic | 14(0.80%) | 14(0.60%) | 0.00 | 6 | ||
| Protestant | 261(14.50%) | 506(20.60%) | 83(20.10%) | 7 | ||
| Muslim | 743(41.30%) | 996(40.60%) | 182(44.20%) | 7 | ||
| Other | 13(0.70%) | 16(0.70%) | 7(1.70%) | 7 | ||
| Wealth index | Poorest | 319(17.70%) | 581(23.70%) | 155(37.60%) | 8 | <0.001 |
| Poorer | 223(12.40%) | 456(18.60%) | 76(18.40%) | 7 | ||
| Middle | 233(12.90%) | 382(15.60%) | 78(18.90%) | 7 | ||
| Rich | 219(12.20%) | 391(15.90%) | 58(14.10%) | 7 | ||
| Richest | 807(44.80%) | 643(26.20%) | 45(10.90%) | 4 | ||
| Occupation | Not Working | 925(51.40%) | 1293(52.70%) | 242(58.70%) | 6 | <0.001 |
| Working | 876(48.60%) | 1160(47.30%) | 170(41.30%) | 7 | ||
| Husband education | No education | 513(31.30%) | 901(39.40%) | 214(55.00%) | 9 | <0.001 |
| Primary | 534(32.60%) | 893(39.10%) | 129(33.20%) | 8 | ||
| Secondary | 309(18.90%) | 292(12.80%) | 32(8.20%) | 7 | ||
| Higher | 282(17.20%) | 198(8.70%) | 14(3.60%) | 5 | ||
| Media access | No | 812(45.10%) | 1429(58.30%) | 299(72.60%) | 7 | <0.001 |
| Yes | 989(54.90%) | 1024(41.70%) | 113(27.40%) | 5 | ||
| The decision on health care service | Respondent alone | 326(19.90%) | 406(17.80%) | 61(15.70%) | 7 | 0.01 |
| Respondent and husband | 1088(66.40%) | 1482(64.9%) | 235(60.40%) | 7 | ||
| Husband alone | 224(13.70%) | 395(17.30%) | 93(23.90%) | 7 | ||
| Health insurance | No | 95(5.30%) | 106(4.30%) | 11(2.70%) | 7 | <0.001 |
| Yes | 1706(94.70%) | 2347(95.70%) | 401(97.30%) | 6 | ||
| Distance to a health facility | Big problem | 704(39.10%) | 1140(46.50%) | 220(53.40%) | 7 | <0.001 |
| Not big problem | 1097(60.90%) | 1313(53.50%) | 192(46.60%) | 5 | ||
| Pregnancy intension | Then | 1473(81.80%) | 1937(79.00%) | 321(77.90%) | 6 | 0.03 |
| Later | 259(14.40%) | 361(14.70%) | 67(16.30%) | 7 | ||
| No more | 69(3.80%) | 155(6.30%) | 24(5.80%) | 7 | ||
MST = Mean Survival Time.
Univariate and multivariate cox-regression analysis showing predictors of timing of first antenatal care visit in Ethiopia.
| Variable | Categories | Unadjusted HR (CI: 95%) | Adjusted HR (CI: 95%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 15–19 | 1 | 1 |
| 20–24 | 1.90(1.60–2.70) | 1.20(1.10–2.50) | |
| 25–34 | 2.30(2.10–5.30) | 1.80(1.68–4.90) | |
| 35–49 | 1.90(1.11–1.46) | 1.90(1.13–2.38) | |
| Educational status | No education | 1 | 1 |
| Primary | 3.50(2.84–3.88) | 2.50(2.34–3.68) | |
| Secondary | 4.80(2.50–8.77) | 4.30(2.2–7.66) | |
| Higher | 5.3(4.96–13.8) | 4.80(4.56–10.80) | |
| Marital status | Never in union | 1 | 1 |
| Currently married | 1.30(0.89–1.79) | 1.10(0.77–1.64) | |
| Formerly in union | 2.90(2.03–5.75) | 1.90(0.59–5.75) | |
| Resident | Urban | 5.10(4.36–6.22) | 3.60(2.70–4.32) |
| Rural | 1 | 1 | |
| Religion | Orthodox | 1 | 1 |
| Catholic | 1.33(0.68–2.67) | 1.10(0.33–9.59) | |
| Protestant | 2.00(0.94–7.50) | 1.61(0.78–6.62) | |
| Muslim | 0.84(0.81–0.89) | 0.67(0.62–0.73) | |
| Other | 1.70(0.44–2.84) | 1.30(0.21–1.95) | |
| Wealth index | Poorest | 1 | 1 |
| Poorer | 2.30(1.87–9.52) | 1.90(0.69–6.35) | |
| Middle | 2.90(2.23–6.28) | 2.30(1.55–4.73) | |
| Rich | 3.70(2.80–6.43) | 2.60(1.80–4.34) | |
| Richest | 4.87(3.68–10.56) | 3.20(2.50–9.65) | |
| Occupation | Not Working | 1 | 1 |
| Working | 2.50(2.22–4.82) | 1.50(1.35–3.67) | |
| Husband education | No education | 1 | 1 |
| Primary | 1.50(1.19–3.66) | 1.50(0.99–4.83) | |
| Secondary | 2.10(1.90–4.52) | 1.20(1.19–5.30) | |
| Higher | 3.80(2.53–8.94) | 2.40(1.86–5.22) | |
| Media access | No | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 1.90(1.30–2.97) | 1.20(1.10–2.45) | |
| The decision on health care service | Respondent alone | 2.60(1.87–4.86) | 0.88(0.39–9.87) |
| Respondent and husband | 3.80(3.45–9.47) | 1.20(1.10–6.60) | |
| Husband/partner alone | 1 | 1 | |
| Health insurance | No | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 3.30(2.55–9.64) | 2.80(1.88–6.84) | |
| Distance to a health facility | Big problem | 6.40(5.50–11.83) | 4.90(4.50–8.54) |
| Not a big problem | 1 | 1 | |
| Pregnancy intension | Then | 2.00(1.32–4.35) | 0.67(0.85–6.80) |
| Later | 1.70(0.67–8.70) | 0.98(0.48–3.95) | |
| No more | 1 | 1 |
*P-value <0.01
**P-value <0.001, HR = Hazard ratio.