Saira Karimi1, Muhammad Ali Nawaz2, Saadia Naseem1, Ahmed Akrem3, Hussain Ali4, Olivier Dangles5, Zahid Ali1. 1. Department of Biosciences, Plant Biotechnology & Molecular Pharming Lab, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Islamabad, Pakistan. 2. Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. 3. Department of Botany, Institute of Pure and Applied Biology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan. 4. Department of Zoology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan. 5. CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France.
Abstract
The relative effects of climate warming with grazing on medicinally important plants are not fully understood in Hindukush-Himalaya (HKH) region. Therefore, we combined the indigenous knowledge about culturally important therapeutic plants and climate change with experimental warming (open-top chambers) and manual clipping (simulated grazing effect) and compared the relative difference on aboveground biomass and percent cover of plant species at five alpine meadow sites on an elevation gradient (4696 m-3346 m) from 2016-2018. Experimental warming increased biomass and percent cover throughout the experiment. However, the interactive treatment effect (warming x clipping) was significant on biomass but not on percent cover. These responses were taxa specific. Warming induced an increase of 1 ± 0.6% in Bistorta officinalis percent cover while for Poa alpina it was 18.7 ± 4.9%. Contrastingly, clipping had a marginally significant effect in reducing the biomass and cover of all plant species. Clipping treatment reduced vegetation cover & biomass by 2.3% and 6.26%, respectively, but that was not significant due to the high variability among taxa response at different sites. It was found that clipping decreased the effects of warming in interactive plots. Thus, warming may increase the availability of therapeutic plants for indigenous people while overgrazing would have deteriorating effects locally. The findings of this research illustrate that vegetation sensitivity to warming and overgrazing is likely to affect man-environment relationships, and traditional knowledge on a regional scale.
The relative effects of climate wn class="Chemical">arming with grazing on medicinally important plants are not fully understood in Hindukush-Himalaya (HKH) region. Therefore, we combined the indigenous knowledge about culturally important therapeutic plants and climate change with experimental warming (open-top chambers) and manual clipping (simulated grazing effect) and compared the relative difference on aboveground biomass and percent cover of plant species at five alpine meadow sites on an elevation gradient (4696 m-3346 m) from 2016-2018. Experimental warming increased biomass and percent cover throughout the experiment. However, the interactive treatment effect (warming x clipping) was significant on biomass but not on percent cover. These responses were taxa specific. Warming induced an increase of 1 ± 0.6% in Bistorta officinalis percent cover while for Poa alpina it was 18.7 ± 4.9%. Contrastingly, clipping had a marginally significant effect in reducing the biomass and cover of all plant species. Clipping treatment reduced vegetation cover & biomass by 2.3% and 6.26%, respectively, but that was not significant due to the high variability among taxa response at different sites. It was found that clipping decreased the effects of warming in interactive plots. Thus, warming may increase the availability of therapeutic plants for indigenous people while overgrazing would have deteriorating effects locally. The findings of this research illustrate that vegetation sensitivity to warming and overgrazing is likely to affect man-environment relationships, and traditional knowledge on a regional scale.
Authors: Wilfried Thuiller; Sandra Lavorel; Miguel B Araújo; Martin T Sykes; I Colin Prentice Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-05-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Elizabeth T Borer; Eric W Seabloom; Daniel S Gruner; W Stanley Harpole; Helmut Hillebrand; Eric M Lind; Peter B Adler; Juan Alberti; T Michael Anderson; Jonathan D Bakker; Lori Biederman; Dana Blumenthal; Cynthia S Brown; Lars A Brudvig; Yvonne M Buckley; Marc Cadotte; Chengjin Chu; Elsa E Cleland; Michael J Crawley; Pedro Daleo; Ellen I Damschen; Kendi F Davies; Nicole M DeCrappeo; Guozhen Du; Jennifer Firn; Yann Hautier; Robert W Heckman; Andy Hector; Janneke HilleRisLambers; Oscar Iribarne; Julia A Klein; Johannes M H Knops; Kimberly J La Pierre; Andrew D B Leakey; Wei Li; Andrew S MacDougall; Rebecca L McCulley; Brett A Melbourne; Charles E Mitchell; Joslin L Moore; Brent Mortensen; Lydia R O'Halloran; John L Orrock; Jesús Pascual; Suzanne M Prober; David A Pyke; Anita C Risch; Martin Schuetz; Melinda D Smith; Carly J Stevens; Lauren L Sullivan; Ryan J Williams; Peter D Wragg; Justin P Wright; Louie H Yang Journal: Nature Date: 2014-03-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Saud L Al-Rowaily; Magdy I El-Bana; Dhafer A Al-Bakre; Abdulaziz M Assaeed; Ahmad K Hegazy; Mohammed Basharat Ali Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci Date: 2015-05-09 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Jiajia Liu; Detuan Liu; Kun Xu; Lian-Ming Gao; Xue-Jun Ge; Kevin S Burgess; Marc W Cadotte Journal: Ecol Evol Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 2.912