| Literature DB >> 18445249 |
Haile Yineger1, Delenasaw Yewhalaw, Demel Teketay.
Abstract
An ethnomedicinal study was conducted to document the indigenous medicinal plant knowledge and use by traditional healers in southwestern Ethiopia from December 2005 to November 2006. Data were collected from 45 randomly selected traditional healers using semi-structured interviews and observations. Sixty-seven ethnomedicinal plant species used by traditional healers to manage 51 different human ailments were identified and documented. Healers' indigenous knowledge was positively correlated with their reported age but not with their educational level. High degree of consensus was observed among traditional healers in treating tumor (locally known as Tanacha), rabies (Dhukuba Seree) and insect bite (Hadhaa). The use of more than one species was significantly cited for remedy preparations. The reported abundance of the ethnomedicinal plant species varied significantly with respect to the presence of multiple uses of the reported species. Our results showed that ethnomedicinal plant species used by healers are under serious threat due to several factors, which indicates the need for urgent attention towards their conservation and sustainable utilization.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18445249 PMCID: PMC2390512 DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-4-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed ISSN: 1746-4269 Impact factor: 2.733
Figure 1Location of the study Kebeles in the three selected districts of Jimma Zone, Ethiopia.
Healers' consensus factor and fidelity levels
| Tumor | 0.50 | 66.67 | |
| 40.00 | |||
| Rabies | 0.33 | 100.00 | |
| 50.00 | |||
| 50.00 | |||
| Insect bite | 0.33 | 33.33 | |
| 50.00 | |||
| Rheumatism | 0.29 | 42.86 | |
| 20.00 | |||
| 50.00 | |||
| 33.33 | |||
| 25.00 | |||
| 33.33 | |||
| 0.25 | 14.29 | ||
| 50.00 | |||
| 40.00 |
Statistical tests of significance
| Chi-square | Mean no spp Vs District | 286.401* | 27 | 0.0001 | |
| Spp abundance Vs Parts used | 232.134* | 76 | 0.0001 | ||
| Spp abundance Vs Condition used (Fresh/Dried) | 167.170* | 12 | 0.0001 | ||
| Spp abundance Vs Marketability | 167.538* | 8 | 0.0001 | ||
| Spp abundance Vs Added values | 17.343* | 4 | 0.0002 | ||
| Spearman Rank Correlation | Diversity of spp Vs Altitude | -0.290** | 0.0001 | ||
| Age of healers Vs No spp | 0.446** | 0.0001 | |||
| Educational level of healers Vs No spp | 0.055* | 0.483 |
* Significant at 0.05 level (two tailed); ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two tailed).
Medicinal plant families in the study area with the corresponding numbers of species
| Fabaceae | 10 | 14.93 |
| Euphorbiaceae | 6 | 8.96 |
| Asteraceae | 5 | 7.46 |
| Lamiaceae | 4 | 5.97 |
| Solanaceae | 3 | 4.48 |
| Rutaceae | 2 | 2.99 |
| Rubiaceae | 2 | 2.99 |
| Ranunculaceae | 2 | 2.99 |
| Myrsinaceae | 2 | 2.99 |
| Malvaceae | 2 | 2.99 |
| Loranthaceae | 2 | 2.99 |
| Cucurbitaceae | 2 | 2.99 |
| Asclepiadaceae | 2 | 2.99 |
| Acanthaceae | 2 | 2.99 |
| Vitaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Ulmaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Salicaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Podocarpaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Poaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Plumbaginaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Phytolaccaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Oxalidaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Oleaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Myricaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Moraceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Menispermaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Melianthaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Hypericaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Flacourtiaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Dioscoriaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Colchicaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Boraginaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Apocynaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Amaranthaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
| Verbenaceae | 1 | 1.49 |
Figure 2Medicinal plant habits and proportion of human ailments treated.
Figure 3Medicinal plant parts used to the treatment of human ailments.
Reported methods of preparation of traditional medicine
| Crushed | 60 | 35.09 |
| Squeezed | 46 | 26.90 |
| Powdered | 20 | 11.70 |
| Pounded | 13 | 7.60 |
| Concocted | 12 | 7.02 |
| Extracted with cold water | 11 | 6.43 |
| Decocted | 4 | 2.34 |
| Warmed | 2 | 1.17 |
| Smoked | 1 | 0.58 |
| Extracted by boiling stem | 1 | 0.58 |
| Enclosed in a piece of close | 1 | 0.58 |
Figure 4Administration routes of traditional medicine.
Figure 5Threats to medicinal plant species of human importance.
Figure 6Other uses of medicinal plant species.