| Literature DB >> 33954079 |
Aya Okuda1, Rintaro Inoue1, Ken Morishima1, Tomohide Saio2, Yasuhiro Yunoki3, Maho Yagi-Utsumi3,4,5, Hirokazu Yagi3, Masahiro Shimizu1, Nobuhiro Sato1, Reiko Urade1, Koichi Kato3,4,5, Masaaki Sugiyama1.
Abstract
The distinguished feature of neutron as a scattering probe is an isotope effect, especially the large difference in neutron scattering length between hydrogen and deuterium. The difference renders the different visibility between hydrogenated and deuterated proteins. Therefore, the combination of deuterated protein and neutron scattering enables the selective visualization of a target domain in the complex or a target protein in the multi-component system. Despite of this fascinating character, there exist several problems for the general use of this method: difficulty and high cost for protein deuteration, and control and determination of deuteration ratio of the sample. To resolve them, the protocol of protein deuteration techniques is presented in this report. It is strongly expected that this protocol will offer more opportunity for conducting the neutron scattering studies with deuterated proteins. 2021 THE BIOPHYSICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN.Entities:
Keywords: contrast matching method; neutron scattering; protein deuteration
Year: 2021 PMID: 33954079 PMCID: PMC8049778 DOI: 10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v18.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biophys Physicobiol ISSN: 2189-4779
Figure 1 Neutron scattering length densities (SLD) of lipid, hydrogenated protein (h-protein), nucleic acid, partially-deuterated protein (pd-protein) and 100% deuterated protein (100d-protein).
Figure 2 SLD of protein in 0% (red line) and 100% (blue line) D2O solvent as a function of the degree of deuteration.
Figure 3 (a) IR spectra from D2O/H2O ratio of 30.0% (v/v) (orange line), 40.0% (v/v) (lemon line), 50.0% (v/v) (light green line), 60.0% (v/v) (green line), 70.0% (v/v) (cyan line), 80.0% (v/v) (light blue line), 90.0% (v/v) (blue line) and 99.96% (v/v) (purple line), respectively. (b) Area ratio of Peak 2 to Peak 1 as a function of D2O/H2O ratio (circle) and solid line corresponds to fit with a polynomial equation.
Ingredients of 5× LB broth
| 5× LB broth | 1× concentration | |
|---|---|---|
| bacto-tryptone | 50.0 g | 10.0 g/L |
| bacto-yeast extract | 25.0 g | 5.0 g/L |
| NaCl | 50.0 g | 10.0 g/L |
| NaOH | adjust to pH 7.5 | |
| D. W | up to 1 L | |
| Total | 1 L | *autoclave |
Ingredients of 10× M9 medium
| 10× M9 medium | 1× concentration | |
|---|---|---|
| NH4Cl | 10.0 g | 18.7 mM |
| KH2PO4 | 20.0 g | 14.7 mM |
| Na2HPO4 | 63.4 g | 44.7 mM |
| NaCl | 5.0 g | 8.6 mM |
| H2O | up to 1 L | |
| Total | 1 L | *autoclave |
Ingredients of additive solution for 1 L M9 medium
| Additive solution for 1 L M9 medium | final concentration | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 M MgSO4 | 1.0 mL | 2.0 mM |
| 1 M CaCl2 | 100.0 μL | 100.0 μM |
| 0.1 M FeCl3 | 216.0 μL | 21.6 μM |
| 50 mg/mL Thiamin | 48.0 μL | 2.4 mg/L |
| 1 mg/mL Biotin | 1.2 mL | 1.2 mg/L |
| Total | 2.6 mL | *freeze-dry |
Figure 4 The schematic procedures for the cultivation of 100d-protein.
Ingredients of 30%, 60% and 80% D2O LB broth
| 30% D2O LB broth | |
|---|---|
| 5× LB broth | 1.0 mL |
| filter-sterilized D2O | 1.5 mL |
| sterile H2O | 2.5 mL |
| antibiotic (in H2O) | |
| Total | 5.0 mL |
| 60% D2O LB broth | |
| 5× LB broth | 1.0 mL |
| filter-sterilized D2O | 3.0 mL |
| sterile H2O | 1.0 mL |
| antibiotic (in H2O) | |
| Total | 5.0 mL |
| 80% D2O LB broth | |
| 5× LB broth | 1.0 mL |
| filter-sterilized D2O | 4.0 mL |
| antibiotic (in H2O) | |
| Total | 5.0 mL |
Ingredients of 100% D2O M9 medium
| Ingredient | weight/volume | final concentration |
|---|---|---|
| NH4Cl | 1.0 g | 18.7 mM |
| KH2PO4 | 2.0 g | 14.7 mM |
| Na2HPO4 | 6.34 g | 44.7 mM |
| NaCl | 0.5 g | 8.6 mM |
| deuterated D-glucose | 2.0 g | 2.0 mg/mL |
| D2O | 1 L | |
| freeze-dried antibiotic | appropriate weight | appropriate concentration |
| freeze-dried additive | Refer to | |
| Total | 1 L | *filter sterilize |
Figure 5 The schematic procedures for the cultivation of pd-protein.
Ingredients of 75% D2O M9 medium
| Ingredient | weight/volume | final concentration |
|---|---|---|
| 10× M9 medium | 100.0 mL | |
| deuterated D-glucose | 1.5 g | 1.5 mg/mL |
| hydrogenated D-glucose | 0.5 g | 0.5 mg/mL |
| D2O | 750.0 mL | |
| H2O | 150.0 mL | |
| freeze-dried antibiotic | appropriate weight | appropriate concentration |
| freeze-dried additive | Refer to | |
| Total | 1 L | *filter sterilize |
Figure 6 Mass spectra of hydrogenated (a) and deuterated (b) SyKaiA. Mass spectra of hydrogenated (c) and deuterated (d) αB-cry.
Numbers of non-exchangeable H atoms in h-protein, Δm/z values and the degrees of deuteration of SyKaiA and αB-cry
| number of non-exchangeable H | degree of deuteration (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| SyKaiA | 1747 | 1764.5±26.2 | 101.0±1.5 |
| αB-cry | 1093 | 773.2±13.0 | 70.4±1.2 |
Figure 7 (a) SANS intensity profiles as a function of Q of pd-αB-cry in 0% (blue circle), 40% (v/v) (red triangle) or 100% (green square) D2O solvent. (b) (I0/c)0.5 as a function of volume fraction of D2O. The solid line corresponds to the result of fit with a linear function.
Figure 8 The calculated I0 value as a function of the degree of deuteration level of αB-cry in 100% D2O. Inset indicates its magnified plot at around the exact degree of deuteration point (=73.2%), indicated by the solid arrow.
Figure 9 IR spectra of 90.0% (v/v) D2O (blue line), 99.96% (v/v) D2O (green line) and D2O buffer (red line).
Figure 10 (a) Viscous residual material left after evaporation. (b) Recycled D2O with activated charcoal in the medium bottle. (c) IR spectra of 99.96% (v/v) D2O (purple line) and recycled D2O (pink line) from 100% D2O M9 medium.